Error profiles of facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
International psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1017/S1041610223000297
Kimberly Gressie, Fiona Kumfor, Her Teng, David Foxe, Emma Devenney, Rebekah M Ahmed, Olivier Piguet
{"title":"Error profiles of facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Kimberly Gressie, Fiona Kumfor, Her Teng, David Foxe, Emma Devenney, Rebekah M Ahmed, Olivier Piguet","doi":"10.1017/S1041610223000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the patterns of errors in facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes compared with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants were recruited from FRONTIER, the frontotemporal dementia research group at the University of Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 356 participants (behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD): 62, semantic dementia (SD)-left: 29, SD-right: 14, progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA): 21, AD: 76, controls: 90) were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Facial emotion recognition was assessed using the Facial Affect Selection Task, a word-face matching task measuring recognition of the six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise), as well as neutral emotion, portrayed by black and white faces.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, all clinical groups performed significantly worse than controls with the exception of the PNFA subgroup (<i>p</i> = .051). The SD-right group scored worse than all other clinical groups (all <i>p</i> values < .027) and the bvFTD subgroup performed worse than the PNFA group (<i>p</i> < .001). The most frequent errors were in response to the facial emotions <i>disgust</i> (26.1%) and <i>fear</i> (22.9%). The primary error response to each target emotion was identified; patterns of errors were similar across all clinical groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facial emotion recognition is impaired in FTD and AD compared to healthy controls. Within FTD, bvFTD and SD-right are particularly impaired. Dementia groups cannot be distinguished based on error responses alone. Implications for future clinical diagnosis and research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"455-464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610223000297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the patterns of errors in facial emotion recognition in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes compared with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy controls.

Design: Retrospective analysis.

Setting: Participants were recruited from FRONTIER, the frontotemporal dementia research group at the University of Sydney, Australia.

Participants: A total of 356 participants (behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD): 62, semantic dementia (SD)-left: 29, SD-right: 14, progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA): 21, AD: 76, controls: 90) were included.

Measurements: Facial emotion recognition was assessed using the Facial Affect Selection Task, a word-face matching task measuring recognition of the six basic emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise), as well as neutral emotion, portrayed by black and white faces.

Results: Overall, all clinical groups performed significantly worse than controls with the exception of the PNFA subgroup (p = .051). The SD-right group scored worse than all other clinical groups (all p values < .027) and the bvFTD subgroup performed worse than the PNFA group (p < .001). The most frequent errors were in response to the facial emotions disgust (26.1%) and fear (22.9%). The primary error response to each target emotion was identified; patterns of errors were similar across all clinical groups.

Conclusions: Facial emotion recognition is impaired in FTD and AD compared to healthy controls. Within FTD, bvFTD and SD-right are particularly impaired. Dementia groups cannot be distinguished based on error responses alone. Implications for future clinical diagnosis and research are discussed.

额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病中面部情绪识别的错误谱。
目的:探讨额颞叶痴呆(FTD)亚型与阿尔茨海默病(AD)和健康对照者面部情绪识别错误的模式。设计:回顾性分析。背景:参与者来自澳大利亚悉尼大学额颞叶痴呆研究小组FRONTIER。参与者:共356名参与者(行为变异性FTD (bvFTD): 62名,语义性痴呆(SD)-左:29名,SD-右:14名,进行性非流利性失语(PNFA): 21名,AD: 76名,对照组:90名)。测量方法:使用面部情绪选择任务来评估面部情绪识别,这是一个词-脸匹配任务,测量对六种基本情绪(愤怒、厌恶、恐惧、快乐、悲伤和惊讶)以及由黑人和白人面孔描绘的中性情绪的识别。结果:总体而言,除PNFA亚组外,所有临床组的表现均明显差于对照组(p = 0.051)。SD-right组评分低于其他临床组(p值均< 0.027),bvFTD组评分低于PNFA组(p < 0.001)。最常见的错误是对面部情绪的反应,厌恶(26.1%)和恐惧(22.9%)。对每个目标情绪的主要错误反应进行了识别;所有临床组的错误模式相似。结论:与健康对照组相比,FTD和AD患者的面部情绪识别功能受损。在FTD中,bvFTD和SD-right受损尤为严重。不能仅根据错误反应来区分痴呆组。对未来临床诊断和研究的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信