Should Animal Welfare be Included in Educational Programs? Attitudes of Secondary and University Students from Eight EU Countries.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Niloofar Pejman, Zein Kallas, Lourdes Reig, Antonio Velarde, María Moreno, Diego Magnani, Vicky Protopapadaki, Vytautas Ribikauskas, Daiva Ribikauskienė, Antoni Dalmau
{"title":"Should Animal Welfare be Included in Educational Programs? Attitudes of Secondary and University Students from Eight EU Countries.","authors":"Niloofar Pejman,&nbsp;Zein Kallas,&nbsp;Lourdes Reig,&nbsp;Antonio Velarde,&nbsp;María Moreno,&nbsp;Diego Magnani,&nbsp;Vicky Protopapadaki,&nbsp;Vytautas Ribikauskas,&nbsp;Daiva Ribikauskienė,&nbsp;Antoni Dalmau","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2021.1969931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal Welfare (AW) educational programs aim to promote positive attitudes of future generations toward animal production systems. This study investigated whether secondary and university students in the majors that are not related to AW teaching believe that this concept should be included also in their educational programs. The determinant factors affecting students' attitudes toward such a decision were analyzed. This research has focused on eight European countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) targeting 3,881 respondents composed of 1,952 secondary and 1,929 university students. The results showed that female university students with a high level of subjective and objective knowledge on AW and who required more restrictive AW regulations, gave support to include the concept in their educational programs. However, Students who support medical experiments that use animals to improve human health were less likely to accept AW education. Furthermore, students in Italy compared to those in Sweden were prone to support AW educational programs. Results highlight the importance of teaching the AW concept as a comprehensive teaching tool at universities and schools' programs as it may constitute a starting point for a more sustainable society toward improving animal living conditions, mainly in the Mediterranean countries in secondary schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.1969931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Animal Welfare (AW) educational programs aim to promote positive attitudes of future generations toward animal production systems. This study investigated whether secondary and university students in the majors that are not related to AW teaching believe that this concept should be included also in their educational programs. The determinant factors affecting students' attitudes toward such a decision were analyzed. This research has focused on eight European countries (Spain, the United Kingdom, Poland, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Italy, and Sweden) targeting 3,881 respondents composed of 1,952 secondary and 1,929 university students. The results showed that female university students with a high level of subjective and objective knowledge on AW and who required more restrictive AW regulations, gave support to include the concept in their educational programs. However, Students who support medical experiments that use animals to improve human health were less likely to accept AW education. Furthermore, students in Italy compared to those in Sweden were prone to support AW educational programs. Results highlight the importance of teaching the AW concept as a comprehensive teaching tool at universities and schools' programs as it may constitute a starting point for a more sustainable society toward improving animal living conditions, mainly in the Mediterranean countries in secondary schools.

动物福利应该包括在教育项目中吗?来自八个欧盟国家的中学生和大学生的态度。
动物福利(AW)教育计划旨在促进后代对动物生产系统的积极态度。本研究调查了与AW教学无关的专业的中学生和大学生是否认为这一概念也应该纳入他们的教育计划。分析了影响学生对这一决定态度的决定因素。这项研究的重点是八个欧洲国家(西班牙、英国、波兰、希腊、立陶宛、罗马尼亚、意大利和瑞典),共有3881名受访者,其中包括1952名中学生和1929名大学生。研究结果表明,主客观知识水平较高的女大学生,对法律法规要求较高的女大学生,支持将法律概念纳入其教育计划。然而,支持利用动物进行医学实验以改善人类健康的学生接受动物科学教育的可能性较小。此外,与瑞典学生相比,意大利学生更倾向于支持AW教育项目。研究结果强调了在大学和学校课程中教授动物保护概念作为综合教学工具的重要性,因为它可能构成一个更可持续的社会,以改善动物生活条件的起点,主要是在地中海国家的中学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信