Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yuk Yee Chong, Ping Keung Chan, Vincent Wai Kwan Chan, Amy Cheung, Michelle Hilda Luk, Man Hong Cheung, Henry Fu, Kwong Yuen Chiu
{"title":"Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.","authors":"Yuk Yee Chong, Ping Keung Chan, Vincent Wai Kwan Chan, Amy Cheung, Michelle Hilda Luk, Man Hong Cheung, Henry Fu, Kwong Yuen Chiu","doi":"10.1186/s42836-023-00195-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine learning is a promising and powerful technology with increasing use in orthopedics. Periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty results in increased morbidity and mortality. This systematic review investigated the use of machine learning in preventing periprosthetic joint infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed was searched in November 2022. All studies that investigated the clinical applications of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty were included. Non-English studies, studies with no full text available, studies focusing on non-clinical applications of machine learning, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. For each included study, its characteristics, machine learning applications, algorithms, statistical performances, strengths and limitations were summarized. Limitations of the current machine learning applications and the studies, including their 'black box' nature, overfitting, the requirement of a large dataset, the lack of external validation, and their retrospective nature were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies were included in the final analysis. Machine learning applications in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection were divided into four categories: prediction, diagnosis, antibiotic application and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning may be a favorable alternative to manual methods in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty. It aids in preoperative health optimization, preoperative surgical planning, the early diagnosis of infection, the early application of suitable antibiotics, and the prediction of clinical outcomes. Future research is warranted to resolve the current limitations and bring machine learning into clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10265805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00195-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Machine learning is a promising and powerful technology with increasing use in orthopedics. Periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty results in increased morbidity and mortality. This systematic review investigated the use of machine learning in preventing periprosthetic joint infection.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed was searched in November 2022. All studies that investigated the clinical applications of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty were included. Non-English studies, studies with no full text available, studies focusing on non-clinical applications of machine learning, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. For each included study, its characteristics, machine learning applications, algorithms, statistical performances, strengths and limitations were summarized. Limitations of the current machine learning applications and the studies, including their 'black box' nature, overfitting, the requirement of a large dataset, the lack of external validation, and their retrospective nature were identified.

Results: Eleven studies were included in the final analysis. Machine learning applications in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection were divided into four categories: prediction, diagnosis, antibiotic application and prognosis.

Conclusion: Machine learning may be a favorable alternative to manual methods in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty. It aids in preoperative health optimization, preoperative surgical planning, the early diagnosis of infection, the early application of suitable antibiotics, and the prediction of clinical outcomes. Future research is warranted to resolve the current limitations and bring machine learning into clinical settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习在预防全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染中的应用:系统综述。
背景:机器学习是一项前景广阔且功能强大的技术,在骨科领域的应用日益广泛。全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染会增加发病率和死亡率。本系统综述调查了机器学习在预防假体周围关节感染中的应用:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行了系统综述。在 2022 年 11 月对 PubMed 进行了检索。纳入了所有调查机器学习在预防全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染中的临床应用的研究。非英语研究、无全文的研究、关注机器学习非临床应用的研究、综述和荟萃分析均被排除在外。对于每项纳入的研究,都对其特点、机器学习应用、算法、统计性能、优势和局限性进行了总结。此外,还找出了当前机器学习应用和研究的局限性,包括其 "黑箱 "性质、过度拟合、对大型数据集的要求、缺乏外部验证以及其回顾性等:结果:11 项研究被纳入最终分析。机器学习在预防假体周围关节感染中的应用分为四类:预测、诊断、抗生素应用和预后:结论:在预防全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染方面,机器学习可能是人工方法的有利替代品。它有助于术前健康优化、术前手术规划、感染的早期诊断、合适抗生素的早期应用以及临床结果的预测。要解决目前的局限性并将机器学习应用到临床中,未来的研究还很有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信