Usefulness of a 4-Grade Novel Mouthpiece Device for Increased Mouth Pressure Reproducing Artificial Difficulty in Breathing.

Q4 Medicine
Kurume Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-25 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008
Akiko Yorita, Yoshihisa Tokunaga, Takashi Kinoshita, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Hanako Oda, Haruki Imaoka, Kazuko Matsunaga, Tatsuyuki Kakuma, Tomoaki Hoshino, Tomotaka Kawayama
{"title":"Usefulness of a 4-Grade Novel Mouthpiece Device for Increased Mouth Pressure Reproducing Artificial Difficulty in Breathing.","authors":"Akiko Yorita,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Tokunaga,&nbsp;Takashi Kinoshita,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Nakakura,&nbsp;Hanako Oda,&nbsp;Haruki Imaoka,&nbsp;Kazuko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Tatsuyuki Kakuma,&nbsp;Tomoaki Hoshino,&nbsp;Tomotaka Kawayama","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of a novel 4-grade mouthpiece device to reproduce difficulty in breathing was assessed in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomized, crossover-controlled trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the device with increasing mouth pressure. The modified Borg (mBorg) scale values, respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) were assessed while using the device.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>The four grades of breathing difficulty device were tested in 32 healthy participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-grade device linearly worsened the mBorg scale with increasing mouth pressure. The mean R5 (± standard deviation [SD]) with grade I, II, III, and IV devices were 5.6 ± 0.1, 10.3 ± 0.3, 21.5 ± 0.7, and 54.8 ± 2.0 kPa/L/s, respectively. The mean %FEV<sub>1</sub> predicted (± SD) were 83.6 ± 15.9% with grade I, 55.3 ± 11.8% with grade II, 32.0 ± 6.1% with grade III, and 15.3 ± 3.2% with the grade IV device. The mBorg scale was positively correlated with R5 (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) and negatively with %FEV<sub>1</sub> predicted (r = -0.81, p < 0.0001). No severe adverse events were reported during the trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that the novel device could effectively reproduce the semi-quantitative artificial difficulty in breathing safely and easily in healthy individuals. These devices could be helpful to understand the mechanisms of difficulty in breathing.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6834008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of a novel 4-grade mouthpiece device to reproduce difficulty in breathing was assessed in healthy individuals.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, crossover-controlled trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of the device with increasing mouth pressure. The modified Borg (mBorg) scale values, respiratory system resistance at 5 Hz (R5), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed while using the device.

Materials: The four grades of breathing difficulty device were tested in 32 healthy participants.

Results: The 4-grade device linearly worsened the mBorg scale with increasing mouth pressure. The mean R5 (± standard deviation [SD]) with grade I, II, III, and IV devices were 5.6 ± 0.1, 10.3 ± 0.3, 21.5 ± 0.7, and 54.8 ± 2.0 kPa/L/s, respectively. The mean %FEV1 predicted (± SD) were 83.6 ± 15.9% with grade I, 55.3 ± 11.8% with grade II, 32.0 ± 6.1% with grade III, and 15.3 ± 3.2% with the grade IV device. The mBorg scale was positively correlated with R5 (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) and negatively with %FEV1 predicted (r = -0.81, p < 0.0001). No severe adverse events were reported during the trial.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that the novel device could effectively reproduce the semi-quantitative artificial difficulty in breathing safely and easily in healthy individuals. These devices could be helpful to understand the mechanisms of difficulty in breathing.

一种4级新型口腔装置的实用性,用于增加口腔压力,再现人工呼吸困难。
目的:评估一种新型4级牙套装置在健康个体中再现呼吸困难的情况。方法:采用双盲、随机、交叉对照试验,研究该装置对口腔压力升高的疗效和安全性。在使用该装置时,评估改良Borg(mBorg)量表值、5 Hz时的呼吸系统阻力(R5)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)。材料:在32名健康参与者中测试了四个级别的呼吸困难装置。结果:4级装置随着口腔压力的增加,mBorg量表线性恶化。I、II、III和IV级装置的平均R5(±标准差[SD])分别为5.6±0.1、10.3±0.3、21.5±0.7和54.8±2.0 kPa/L/s。预测的平均FEV1%(±SD)在I级为83.6±15.9%,在II级为55.3±11.8%,在III级为32.0±6.1%,在IV级为15.3±3.2%。mBorg量表与R5呈正相关(r=0.79,p<0.0001),与预测的%FEV1呈负相关(r=-0.81,p<0.001)。试验期间未报告严重不良事件。结论:我们证明了这种新型装置可以有效地再现健康人安全、轻松的半定量人工呼吸困难。这些设备可能有助于理解呼吸困难的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信