Preclinical evidence for anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Tom Bleeser MD, PhD , Arjen Brenders MD , Talia Rose Hubble MD , Marc Van de Velde MD, PhD, Professor , Jan Deprest MD, PhD, Professor , Steffen Rex MD, PhD, Professor , Sarah Devroe MD, PhD, Professor
{"title":"Preclinical evidence for anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity","authors":"Tom Bleeser MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Arjen Brenders MD ,&nbsp;Talia Rose Hubble MD ,&nbsp;Marc Van de Velde MD, PhD, Professor ,&nbsp;Jan Deprest MD, PhD, Professor ,&nbsp;Steffen Rex MD, PhD, Professor ,&nbsp;Sarah Devroe MD, PhD, Professor","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preclinical research concerning anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity<span> was initiated in 1999. A decade later, the earliest clinical observational data showed mixed results in neurodevelopmental outcomes following anaesthesia exposure at a young age. Hence to date, preclinical studies remain the cornerstone of research in this field, primarily because of the vulnerability of clinical observational studies to confounding bias. This review summarises current preclinical evidence. Most studies used rodent models, although non-human primates have also been employed. Across all gestational and postnatal ages, there is evidence that all commonly used general anaesthetics induce neuronal injury (e.g. apoptosis) and cause neurobehavioural impairment (e.g. learning and memory deficits). These deficits were more pronounced when animals were subjected to either repeated exposure, prolonged durations of exposure or higher doses of anaesthesia. To interpret these results in the clinical context, the strengths and limitations of each model and experiment should be carefully considered, as these preclinical studies were often biased by supraclinical durations and a lack of control with regard to physiological homeostasis.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 16-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152168962300006X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Preclinical research concerning anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity was initiated in 1999. A decade later, the earliest clinical observational data showed mixed results in neurodevelopmental outcomes following anaesthesia exposure at a young age. Hence to date, preclinical studies remain the cornerstone of research in this field, primarily because of the vulnerability of clinical observational studies to confounding bias. This review summarises current preclinical evidence. Most studies used rodent models, although non-human primates have also been employed. Across all gestational and postnatal ages, there is evidence that all commonly used general anaesthetics induce neuronal injury (e.g. apoptosis) and cause neurobehavioural impairment (e.g. learning and memory deficits). These deficits were more pronounced when animals were subjected to either repeated exposure, prolonged durations of exposure or higher doses of anaesthesia. To interpret these results in the clinical context, the strengths and limitations of each model and experiment should be carefully considered, as these preclinical studies were often biased by supraclinical durations and a lack of control with regard to physiological homeostasis.

麻醉引起的神经毒性的临床前证据
关于麻醉引起的神经毒性的临床前研究始于1999年。十年后,最早的临床观察数据显示,在年轻时暴露于麻醉后,神经发育结果喜忧参半。因此,到目前为止,临床前研究仍然是该领域研究的基石,主要是因为临床观察性研究容易受到混淆偏差的影响。这篇综述总结了当前的临床前证据。大多数研究使用啮齿动物模型,尽管也使用了非人类灵长类动物。在所有妊娠期和产后年龄段,有证据表明,所有常用的全身麻醉剂都会诱导神经元损伤(如细胞凋亡)并导致神经行为障碍(如学习和记忆缺陷)。当动物反复暴露、暴露时间延长或麻醉剂量增加时,这些缺陷更加明显。为了在临床背景下解释这些结果,应仔细考虑每个模型和实验的优势和局限性,因为这些临床前研究往往因临床前持续时间和缺乏对生理稳态的控制而存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信