Comparison of two different delivery methods of home-based exercise on neck pain.

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Somatosensory and Motor Research Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1080/08990220.2023.2194389

Özden Yaşarer, Hürriyet Gürsel Yilmaz, Halis Doğan

{"title":"Comparison of two different delivery methods of home-based exercise on neck pain.","authors":"Özden Yaşarer, Hürriyet Gürsel Yilmaz, Halis Doğan","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2023.2194389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of two different home-based exercise delivery methods on compliance, pain, and disability in participants with non-specific neck pain.Materials & methods: The study, which was carried out at Istanbul Arel University between February and May 2018, was carried out with 60 participants from university staff, aged 25-60, suffering from non-specific neck pain. The cases were randomly assigned to two groups. A home exercise method with printed material exercise was given to the patients in Group 1, and a video phone reminder exercise was given to Group 2 for six weeks in both groups. Pain severity and neck disability were evaluated before and after the exercise with the 'Visual Analogue Scale' and the 'Neck Pain and Disability Score.'Results: Descriptive statistics showed that the video phone reminder exercise group had greater compliance. Neck pain and neck disability assessments improved before and after the exercise in both groups (p < .001). Statistical analysis revealed that video phone reminder exercise scores were significantly higher than those of the control group. Effect sizes were evaluated between the two groups, and the difference between them were found to be clinically significant (d > 0.8).Conclusions: The home exercise method with video and telephone reminders, which can be applied instead of the traditional method provided with printed materials, is more effective for compliance, pain severity, and neck disability. Trial registration: NCT04135144. Registered on 21 September 2019. Retrospectively.","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2023.2194389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to compare the effects of two different home-based exercise delivery methods on compliance, pain, and disability in participants with non-specific neck pain.

Materials & methods: The study, which was carried out at Istanbul Arel University between February and May 2018, was carried out with 60 participants from university staff, aged 25-60, suffering from non-specific neck pain. The cases were randomly assigned to two groups. A home exercise method with printed material exercise was given to the patients in Group 1, and a video phone reminder exercise was given to Group 2 for six weeks in both groups. Pain severity and neck disability were evaluated before and after the exercise with the 'Visual Analogue Scale' and the 'Neck Pain and Disability Score.'

Results: Descriptive statistics showed that the video phone reminder exercise group had greater compliance. Neck pain and neck disability assessments improved before and after the exercise in both groups (p < .001). Statistical analysis revealed that video phone reminder exercise scores were significantly higher than those of the control group. Effect sizes were evaluated between the two groups, and the difference between them were found to be clinically significant (d > 0.8).

Conclusions: The home exercise method with video and telephone reminders, which can be applied instead of the traditional method provided with printed materials, is more effective for compliance, pain severity, and neck disability. Trial registration: NCT04135144. Registered on 21 September 2019. Retrospectively.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两种不同居家运动方式治疗颈部疼痛的比较。

目的:本研究旨在比较两种不同的家庭运动方式对非特异性颈部疼痛参与者的依从性、疼痛和残疾的影响。材料与方法:该研究于2018年2月至5月在伊斯坦布尔阿雷尔大学进行，60名参与者来自大学工作人员，年龄在25-60岁之间，患有非特异性颈部疼痛。这些病例被随机分为两组。第一组采用打印材料运动的家庭运动方法，第二组采用视频电话提醒运动，两组均进行6周。用“视觉模拟量表”和“颈部疼痛和残疾评分”对运动前后的疼痛严重程度和颈部残疾进行评估。结果:描述性统计显示，视频电话提醒锻炼组的依从性更高。两组患者运动前后颈部疼痛和颈部残疾评分均有改善(p < 0.001)。统计分析显示，视频电话提醒组的运动得分明显高于对照组。评估两组间的效应量，发现两组间的差异具有临床意义(d > 0.8)。结论:视频和电话提醒的家庭运动方法在依从性、疼痛程度和颈部残疾方面比传统的提供打印材料的方法更有效。试验注册:NCT04135144。2019年9月21日注册回顾。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Somatosensory and Motor Research 医学-神经科学

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.