Clade-Specific Allometries in Avian Basal Metabolic Rate Demand a Broader Theory of Allometry.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Samantha M Giancarli, Arthur E Dunham, Michael P O'Connor
{"title":"Clade-Specific Allometries in Avian Basal Metabolic Rate Demand a Broader Theory of Allometry.","authors":"Samantha M Giancarli,&nbsp;Arthur E Dunham,&nbsp;Michael P O'Connor","doi":"10.1086/725207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractMany attempts at providing a single-scale exponent and mechanism to explain metabolic rate assert a monolithic selective mechanism for allometries, characterized by a universal allometric scale power (usually chosen to be 0.75). To test for the deviations from universal allometric scaling, we gathered data from previously published metabolic measurements on 903 bird species and performed regressions of log(basal metabolic rate) and log(body mass) for (1) all birds and (2) 20 monophyletic clades within birds. We constructed two Bayesian linear mixed models-one included ecological variables and the other included data for mammals from Sieg et al. (2009). Overall allometric patterns differed significantly among clades of birds, and some clades were not consistent with the 0.75 scale power. We were unable to find apparent physiological, morphological, phylogenetic, or ecological characteristics among clades, predicting a difference in allometry or consistency with any previously proposed universal allometry. The Bayesian analysis illuminated novel bivariate, clade-specific differences in scaling slope-intercept space, separating large groups of birds and mammals. While significantly related to basal metabolic rate, feeding guild and migratory tendency had small effects compared to clade and body mass. We propose that allometric hypotheses, in general, must extend beyond simple overarching mechanisms to allow for conflicting and interacting influences that produce allometric patterns at narrower taxonomic scales-perhaps including other processes whose optimization may interfere with that of the system proposed by the metabolic theory of ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

AbstractMany attempts at providing a single-scale exponent and mechanism to explain metabolic rate assert a monolithic selective mechanism for allometries, characterized by a universal allometric scale power (usually chosen to be 0.75). To test for the deviations from universal allometric scaling, we gathered data from previously published metabolic measurements on 903 bird species and performed regressions of log(basal metabolic rate) and log(body mass) for (1) all birds and (2) 20 monophyletic clades within birds. We constructed two Bayesian linear mixed models-one included ecological variables and the other included data for mammals from Sieg et al. (2009). Overall allometric patterns differed significantly among clades of birds, and some clades were not consistent with the 0.75 scale power. We were unable to find apparent physiological, morphological, phylogenetic, or ecological characteristics among clades, predicting a difference in allometry or consistency with any previously proposed universal allometry. The Bayesian analysis illuminated novel bivariate, clade-specific differences in scaling slope-intercept space, separating large groups of birds and mammals. While significantly related to basal metabolic rate, feeding guild and migratory tendency had small effects compared to clade and body mass. We propose that allometric hypotheses, in general, must extend beyond simple overarching mechanisms to allow for conflicting and interacting influences that produce allometric patterns at narrower taxonomic scales-perhaps including other processes whose optimization may interfere with that of the system proposed by the metabolic theory of ecology.

鸟类基础代谢率的进化支特异性异速反应需要更广泛的异速反应理论。
摘要许多提供单一尺度指数和机制来解释代谢率的尝试都主张异速反应的单一选择机制,其特征是通用的异速反应尺度功率(通常选择0.75)。为了检验普遍异速测量的偏差,我们收集了先前发表的903种鸟类的代谢测量数据,并对(1)所有鸟类和(2)鸟类内20个单系进化枝的log(基础代谢率)和log(体重)进行了回归。我们构建了两个贝叶斯线性混合模型——一个包含生态变量,另一个包含Sieg et al.(2009)的哺乳动物数据。整体异速生长模式在不同枝系间存在显著差异,部分枝系与0.75尺度功率不一致。我们无法在进化支中发现明显的生理、形态、系统发育或生态特征,无法预测异速生长的差异或与任何先前提出的普遍异速生长的一致性。贝叶斯分析揭示了新的双变量,进化枝特异性差异的尺度斜截空间,分离大群的鸟类和哺乳动物。摄食行当和迁徙倾向与基础代谢率有显著相关性,但与支系和体重相比影响较小。我们提出异速假说,一般来说,必须超越简单的总体机制,以允许在更窄的分类尺度上产生异速模式的冲突和相互作用的影响-可能包括其他过程,其优化可能会干扰生态学代谢理论提出的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信