Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis between Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin.

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Thuy Anh Vu Pham
{"title":"Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity against <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> between Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin.","authors":"Thuy Anh Vu Pham","doi":"10.1155/2023/9194868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) obtained via low-speed centrifugation has antimicrobial properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), obtained from patients with different periodontal states, against <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i>. A-PRF+ and I-PRF samples were obtained from venous blood of 60 subjects divided equally into three groups: periodontitis, gingivitis, and healthy gingiva groups. The antibacterial experiments evaluated biofilm inhibition, mature biofilm impact, and time-kill kinetics. The percent reduction in biofilm-growing and mature biofilm bacteria ranged from 39% to 49% and 3% to 7%, respectively. In the time-kill kinetics assay, PRF from the periodontitis group was more effective as an antimicrobial than that from the gingivitis and healthy gingiva group (<i>p</i> < 0.001); I-PRF was more effective than A-PRF+ (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and both of them showed peak antibacterial activity after 12 h of exposure. Both A-PRF+ and I-PRF exhibited antibacterial properties against <i>P. gingivalis</i>, but I-PRF appeared to be more effective. The PRF obtained from the different groups appeared to have different degrees of antimicrobial efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2023 ","pages":"9194868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9194868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) obtained via low-speed centrifugation has antimicrobial properties. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), obtained from patients with different periodontal states, against Porphyromonas gingivalis. A-PRF+ and I-PRF samples were obtained from venous blood of 60 subjects divided equally into three groups: periodontitis, gingivitis, and healthy gingiva groups. The antibacterial experiments evaluated biofilm inhibition, mature biofilm impact, and time-kill kinetics. The percent reduction in biofilm-growing and mature biofilm bacteria ranged from 39% to 49% and 3% to 7%, respectively. In the time-kill kinetics assay, PRF from the periodontitis group was more effective as an antimicrobial than that from the gingivitis and healthy gingiva group (p < 0.001); I-PRF was more effective than A-PRF+ (p < 0.05) and both of them showed peak antibacterial activity after 12 h of exposure. Both A-PRF+ and I-PRF exhibited antibacterial properties against P. gingivalis, but I-PRF appeared to be more effective. The PRF obtained from the different groups appeared to have different degrees of antimicrobial efficacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

晚期富血小板纤维蛋白与可注射富血小板纤维蛋白对牙龈卟啉单胞菌抗菌活性的比较。
通过低速离心获得的富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)具有抗菌特性。本研究旨在评估晚期富血小板纤维蛋白+ (A-PRF+)和可注射富血小板纤维蛋白(I-PRF)对不同牙周状态患者牙龈卟啉单胞菌的治疗效果。从60名受试者的静脉血中采集A-PRF+和I-PRF样本,将其平均分为牙周炎组、牙龈炎组和健康牙龈组。抗菌实验评估了生物膜的抑制作用、成熟生物膜的影响和时间杀伤动力学。生物膜生长细菌和成熟生物膜细菌减少的百分比分别为39% ~ 49%和3% ~ 7%。在时间杀伤动力学试验中,牙周炎组的PRF抗菌效果优于牙龈炎组和健康牙龈组(p < 0.001);I-PRF的抑菌活性高于A-PRF+ (p < 0.05),且均在12 h后达到抑菌活性峰值。A-PRF+和I-PRF均表现出对牙龈假单胞菌的抑菌作用,但I-PRF似乎更有效。从不同组获得的PRF具有不同程度的抗菌功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信