Reliability and Validity of the Embouchure Dystonia Severity Rating Scale.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tobias Mantel, André Lee, Shinichi Furuya, Masanori Morise, Eckart Altenmüller, Bernhard Haslinger
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Embouchure Dystonia Severity Rating Scale.","authors":"Tobias Mantel,&nbsp;André Lee,&nbsp;Shinichi Furuya,&nbsp;Masanori Morise,&nbsp;Eckart Altenmüller,&nbsp;Bernhard Haslinger","doi":"10.14802/jmd.22213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Embouchure dystonia (ED) is a task-specific movement disorder that leads to loss of fine motor control of the embouchure and tongue muscles in wind musicians. In contrast to musicians' hand dystonia, no validated severity rating for ED exists, posing a major obstacle for structured assessment in scientific and clinical settings. The aim of this study is to validate an ED severity rating scale (EDSRS) allowing for a standardized estimation of symptom severity in ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EDSRS was set up as a composite score of six items evaluating audio-visual disease symptoms during the performance of three standardized musical tasks (sustained notes, scales, and fourths) separately for each body side. For validation, 17 musicians with ED underwent standardized audiovisual recordings during performance. Anonymized and randomized recordings were assessed by two experts in ED (raters). Statistical analysis included metrics of consistency, reliability, and construct validity with the fluctuation of the fundamental frequency of the acoustic signal (F0) (extracted in an audio analysis of the sustained notes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EDSRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.975-0.983, corrected item-total correlations r = 0.90-0.96), interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] for agreement/consistency = 0.94/0.96), intrarater reliability over time (ICC per rater = 0.93/0.87) and good precision (standard error of measurement = 2.19/2.65), and correlated significantly with F0 variability (r = 0.55-0.60, p = 0.011-0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed EDSRS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of ED severity in the hands of trained expert raters. Its easy applicability makes it suitable not only for routine clinical practice but also for scientific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Movement Disorders","volume":"16 2","pages":"191-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/28/jmd-22213.PMC10236025.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.22213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Embouchure dystonia (ED) is a task-specific movement disorder that leads to loss of fine motor control of the embouchure and tongue muscles in wind musicians. In contrast to musicians' hand dystonia, no validated severity rating for ED exists, posing a major obstacle for structured assessment in scientific and clinical settings. The aim of this study is to validate an ED severity rating scale (EDSRS) allowing for a standardized estimation of symptom severity in ED.

Methods: The EDSRS was set up as a composite score of six items evaluating audio-visual disease symptoms during the performance of three standardized musical tasks (sustained notes, scales, and fourths) separately for each body side. For validation, 17 musicians with ED underwent standardized audiovisual recordings during performance. Anonymized and randomized recordings were assessed by two experts in ED (raters). Statistical analysis included metrics of consistency, reliability, and construct validity with the fluctuation of the fundamental frequency of the acoustic signal (F0) (extracted in an audio analysis of the sustained notes).

Results: The EDSRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.975-0.983, corrected item-total correlations r = 0.90-0.96), interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] for agreement/consistency = 0.94/0.96), intrarater reliability over time (ICC per rater = 0.93/0.87) and good precision (standard error of measurement = 2.19/2.65), and correlated significantly with F0 variability (r = 0.55-0.60, p = 0.011-0.023).

Conclusion: The developed EDSRS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of ED severity in the hands of trained expert raters. Its easy applicability makes it suitable not only for routine clinical practice but also for scientific studies.

Abstract Image

口部肌张力障碍严重程度评定量表的信度和效度。
目的:口部肌张力障碍(ED)是一种任务特异性运动障碍,导致管乐手的口部和舌部肌肉失去精细运动控制。与音乐家的手肌张力障碍相比,ED没有有效的严重程度评级,这对科学和临床环境中的结构化评估构成了主要障碍。本研究的目的是验证ED严重程度评定量表(EDSRS),该量表允许对ED症状严重程度进行标准化估计。方法:EDSRS设置为六个项目的综合评分,分别评估每个身体一侧在三个标准化音乐任务(持续音符,音阶和四度音)中的视听疾病症状。为了验证,17名ED音乐家在表演期间进行了标准化的视听记录。两位ED(评分者)专家对匿名和随机记录进行评估。统计分析包括声学信号(F0)基频波动的一致性、可靠性和结构效度指标(从持续音符的音频分析中提取)。结果:EDSRS具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.975 ~ 0.983,校正后的项目-总相关r = 0.90 ~ 0.96)、组间信度(一致性/一致性的类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.94/0.96)、组内随时间信度(每组间相关系数[ICC] = 0.93/0.87)、精密度(测量标准误差= 2.19/2.65),且与F0变异显著相关(r = 0.55 ~ 0.60, p = 0.011 ~ 0.023)。结论:在训练有素的评分专家手中,所开发的EDSRS是一种有效可靠的ED严重程度评估工具。它的简单适用性使其不仅适用于常规临床实践,也适用于科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Movement Disorders
Journal of Movement Disorders CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信