Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam: Method validation using high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector technique and usefulness in patient care setting.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
R P Munshi, J V Vishwakarma, N R Gawde
{"title":"Therapeutic drug monitoring of levetiracetam: Method validation using high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector technique and usefulness in patient care setting.","authors":"R P Munshi,&nbsp;J V Vishwakarma,&nbsp;N R Gawde","doi":"10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_467_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a modified HPLC-UV method for the estimation of serum levetiracetam levels and to assess the usefulness of serum levetiracetam estimation in epileptic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Modification of a previously existing HPLC-UV method was performed using liquid- liquid phase extraction and processing using reverse phase analytic HPLC-UV detector technique followed by method validation. Serum samples of patients attending our hospital's Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Outpatient Department services were analyzed for levetiracetam levels using the study method. Data of the past 6 years (2015-2020) were descriptively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified HPLC-UV method was validated as per ICH Q2 (R1) 2005 guidelines. Usefulness of levetiracetam estimation was assessed in 1383 patients (635 children, 683 adults, 40 elderly, and 25 pregnant women). Levetiracetam levels were within the therapeutic range (TR) in 520 children, 543 young adults, 35 elderly patients, and nine pregnant women. In 112 of 232 patients with low levetiracetam levels, poor compliance was elicited. Of 641 patients on polytherapy, 446 patients had levetiracetam values within TR, whereas 29 had values above and 166 patients had values less than TR. Sodium valproate, phenytoin sodium, and carbamazepine affected levetiracetam levels when given concomitantly. Levetiracetam dose was adjusted in 61 patients with abnormal levels for better clinical response. Good seizure control was noted in 913 (82.47%) patients whose levels were within TR, whereas 136 (58.62%) patients with low levels reported an increase in seizure frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified HPLC-UV method is simple, rapid, efficient, and reliable for assaying serum levetiracetam.</p>","PeriodicalId":16860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Postgraduate Medicine","volume":"69 2","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Postgraduate Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_467_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a modified HPLC-UV method for the estimation of serum levetiracetam levels and to assess the usefulness of serum levetiracetam estimation in epileptic patients.

Materials and methods: Modification of a previously existing HPLC-UV method was performed using liquid- liquid phase extraction and processing using reverse phase analytic HPLC-UV detector technique followed by method validation. Serum samples of patients attending our hospital's Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Outpatient Department services were analyzed for levetiracetam levels using the study method. Data of the past 6 years (2015-2020) were descriptively analyzed.

Results: The modified HPLC-UV method was validated as per ICH Q2 (R1) 2005 guidelines. Usefulness of levetiracetam estimation was assessed in 1383 patients (635 children, 683 adults, 40 elderly, and 25 pregnant women). Levetiracetam levels were within the therapeutic range (TR) in 520 children, 543 young adults, 35 elderly patients, and nine pregnant women. In 112 of 232 patients with low levetiracetam levels, poor compliance was elicited. Of 641 patients on polytherapy, 446 patients had levetiracetam values within TR, whereas 29 had values above and 166 patients had values less than TR. Sodium valproate, phenytoin sodium, and carbamazepine affected levetiracetam levels when given concomitantly. Levetiracetam dose was adjusted in 61 patients with abnormal levels for better clinical response. Good seizure control was noted in 913 (82.47%) patients whose levels were within TR, whereas 136 (58.62%) patients with low levels reported an increase in seizure frequency.

Conclusions: The modified HPLC-UV method is simple, rapid, efficient, and reliable for assaying serum levetiracetam.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

左乙拉西坦的治疗药物监测:高效液相色谱-紫外检测器技术的方法验证及其在患者护理环境中的实用性。
目的:建立并验证一种改进的高效液相色谱-紫外分光光度法(HPLC-UV)测定癫痫患者血清左乙拉西坦浓度的方法,并评价该方法在癫痫患者血清中左乙拉西坦浓度测定中的实用性。材料和方法:采用液相-液相萃取法对已有的HPLC-UV方法进行改进,采用反相分析HPLC-UV检测器技术进行处理,并对方法进行验证。采用本研究方法对我院治疗药物监测门诊患者血清样本进行左乙拉西坦水平分析。对近6年(2015-2020)的数据进行描述性分析。结果:改进的HPLC-UV方法符合ICH Q2 (R1) 2005的要求。在1383例患者(635例儿童、683例成人、40例老年人和25例孕妇)中评估左乙拉西坦评估的有效性。520名儿童、543名年轻人、35名老年患者和9名孕妇的左乙拉西坦水平均在治疗范围(TR)内。在232例低水平左乙拉西坦患者中,112例患者的依从性较差。在641名接受综合治疗的患者中,446名患者的左乙拉西坦值在TR范围内,29名患者的值高于TR, 166名患者的值低于TR。丙戊酸钠、苯妥英钠和卡马西平同时给予时影响左乙拉西坦水平。为获得更好的临床疗效,对61例水平异常患者调整左乙拉西坦剂量。913例(82.47%)TR水平在范围内的患者癫痫发作控制良好,而136例(58.62%)低水平患者癫痫发作频率增加。结论:改进的高效液相色谱-紫外分光光度法测定血清左乙拉西坦简便、快速、高效、可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to human well being including ethical and social issues. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信