Dual Versus Mono Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Mild-to-Moderate Stroke: A Multicentre Perspective Cohort Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s10557-023-07468-7
Kaili Zhang, Tingting Liu, Haimei Fan, Yongle Wang, Yanan Li, Juan Li, Yali Li, Yaqin Yu, Junhui Wang, Lixi Xue, Wenxian Du, Wenhua Niu, Yuping Yan, Xiaolei Gao, Gaimei Li, Qingping Liu, Yuting Liu, Yanhong Fan, Jing Ren, Xinyi Li, Xuemei Wu, Xiaoyuan Niu
{"title":"Dual Versus Mono Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Mild-to-Moderate Stroke: A Multicentre Perspective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kaili Zhang, Tingting Liu, Haimei Fan, Yongle Wang, Yanan Li, Juan Li, Yali Li, Yaqin Yu, Junhui Wang, Lixi Xue, Wenxian Du, Wenhua Niu, Yuping Yan, Xiaolei Gao, Gaimei Li, Qingping Liu, Yuting Liu, Yanhong Fan, Jing Ren, Xinyi Li, Xuemei Wu, Xiaoyuan Niu","doi":"10.1007/s10557-023-07468-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between different antiplatelet therapy regimens and the functional outcomes and bleeding complications among mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients based on real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the SEACOAST trial (Safety and efficacy of aspirin-clopidogrel in acute noncardiogenic minor ischaemic stroke) to analyse the data of patients with mild-to-moderate stroke within 72 h after onset who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin from September 2019 to November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between groups. We performed an analysis to evaluate the association of different antiplatelet regimens and 90-day disability, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≥2, as well as disability ascribed to index or recurrent stroke by the local investigator. In terms of safety, we then compared the bleeding events between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2822 mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients were treated with either clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1726, 61.2%) or aspirin/clopidogrel (n = 1096, 38.8%). Of 1726 patients in the dual antiplatelet group, 1350 (78.5%) received less than or equal to 30 days of combined therapy. At 90 days, 433 (15.3%) patients were disabled. Patients who received combined therapy had a lower overall disability rate (13.7% versus 17.9%; OR 0.78 (0.6-1.01); P = 0.064). However, investigators found that index stroke was the reason for significantly fewer patients in the dual antiplatelet group having disability (8.4% versus 12%; OR, 0.72 (0.52-0.98); P = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the dual and mono antiplatelet drug regimens (0.4% versus 0.2%; HR 1.5 (0.25, 8.98); P = 0.657).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aspirin plus clopidogrel was associated with a reduction in the incidence of disability attributed to index stroke. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the two antiplatelet drug regimens.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR1900025214.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1259-1270"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-023-07468-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between different antiplatelet therapy regimens and the functional outcomes and bleeding complications among mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients based on real-world data.

Methods: We used data from the SEACOAST trial (Safety and efficacy of aspirin-clopidogrel in acute noncardiogenic minor ischaemic stroke) to analyse the data of patients with mild-to-moderate stroke within 72 h after onset who were treated with aspirin or clopidogrel alone or a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin from September 2019 to November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the differences between groups. We performed an analysis to evaluate the association of different antiplatelet regimens and 90-day disability, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≥2, as well as disability ascribed to index or recurrent stroke by the local investigator. In terms of safety, we then compared the bleeding events between the two groups.

Results: A total of 2822 mild-to-moderate ischaemic stroke patients were treated with either clopidogrel plus aspirin (n = 1726, 61.2%) or aspirin/clopidogrel (n = 1096, 38.8%). Of 1726 patients in the dual antiplatelet group, 1350 (78.5%) received less than or equal to 30 days of combined therapy. At 90 days, 433 (15.3%) patients were disabled. Patients who received combined therapy had a lower overall disability rate (13.7% versus 17.9%; OR 0.78 (0.6-1.01); P = 0.064). However, investigators found that index stroke was the reason for significantly fewer patients in the dual antiplatelet group having disability (8.4% versus 12%; OR, 0.72 (0.52-0.98); P = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the dual and mono antiplatelet drug regimens (0.4% versus 0.2%; HR 1.5 (0.25, 8.98); P = 0.657).

Conclusion: Aspirin plus clopidogrel was associated with a reduction in the incidence of disability attributed to index stroke. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate to severe bleeding complications between the two antiplatelet drug regimens.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900025214.

Abstract Image

急性轻中度脑卒中患者的双重抗血小板治疗与单一抗血小板治疗:一项多中心视角队列研究
背景和目的:本研究的目的是基于真实世界数据,评估不同抗血小板治疗方案与轻中度缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局和出血并发症之间的关系。方法:我们使用SEACOAST试验(阿司匹林-氯吡格雷在急性非心源性轻微缺血性卒中中的安全性和有效性)的数据,分析2019年9月至2021年11月期间单独使用阿司匹林或氯吡格雷或氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合治疗的轻至中度卒中患者在发病后72 h内的数据。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于平衡组间差异。我们进行了一项分析,以评估不同抗血小板方案与90天残疾的关系,90天残疾的定义是修改的Rankin量表得分≥2,以及由当地研究者归因于指数或复发性卒中的残疾。在安全性方面,我们比较了两组之间的出血事件。结果:共有2822例轻中度缺血性脑卒中患者接受氯吡格雷加阿司匹林(n = 1726, 61.2%)或阿司匹林/氯吡格雷(n = 1096, 38.8%)治疗。在双重抗血小板组的1726例患者中,1350例(78.5%)接受少于或等于30天的联合治疗。90天时,433例(15.3%)患者残疾。接受联合治疗的患者总体致残率较低(13.7% vs 17.9%;或0.78 (0.6-1.01);P = 0.064)。然而,研究人员发现,指数性卒中是双重抗血小板组中发生残疾的患者显著减少的原因(8.4%比12%;Or为0.72 (0.52-0.98);P = 0.038)。双抗血小板药物方案和单抗血小板药物方案在中度至重度出血并发症发生率方面无统计学差异(0.4% vs 0.2%;Hr 1.5 (0.25, 8.98);P = 0.657)。结论:阿司匹林加氯吡格雷可降低指数脑卒中致残率。两种抗血小板药物方案在中重度出血并发症发生率上无统计学差异。试验注册号:ChiCTR1900025214。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信