CT Angiography Radiomics Combining Traditional Risk Factors to Predict Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture: a Machine Learning, Multicenter Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Translational Stroke Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s12975-023-01166-0
Shaosen Zhang, Junjie Wang, Shengjun Sun, Qian Zhang, Yuanren Zhai, Xiaochen Wang, Peicong Ge, Zhiyong Shi, Dong Zhang
{"title":"CT Angiography Radiomics Combining Traditional Risk Factors to Predict Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture: a Machine Learning, Multicenter Study.","authors":"Shaosen Zhang, Junjie Wang, Shengjun Sun, Qian Zhang, Yuanren Zhai, Xiaochen Wang, Peicong Ge, Zhiyong Shi, Dong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12975-023-01166-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for predicting brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) rupture using a combination of traditional risk factors and radiomics features. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 586 patients with unruptured bAVMs from 2010 to 2020. All patients were grouped into the hemorrhage (n = 368) and non-hemorrhage (n = 218) groups. The bAVM nidus were segmented on CT angiography images using Slicer software, and radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics. The dataset included a training set and an independent testing set. The machine learning model was developed on the training set and validated on the testing set by merging numerous base estimators and a final estimator based on the stacking method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision, and the f1 score were evaluated to determine the performance of the model. A total of 1790 radiomics features and 8 traditional risk factors were contained in the original dataset, and 241 features remained for model training after L1 regularization filtering. The base estimator of the ensemble model was Logistic Regression, whereas the final estimator was Random Forest. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.982 (0.967-0.996) and 0.893 (0.826-0.960) in the testing set. This study indicated that radiomics features are a valuable addition to traditional risk factors for predicting bAVM rupture. In the meantime, ensemble learning can effectively improve the performance of a prediction model.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":"784-794"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-023-01166-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for predicting brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) rupture using a combination of traditional risk factors and radiomics features. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 586 patients with unruptured bAVMs from 2010 to 2020. All patients were grouped into the hemorrhage (n = 368) and non-hemorrhage (n = 218) groups. The bAVM nidus were segmented on CT angiography images using Slicer software, and radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics. The dataset included a training set and an independent testing set. The machine learning model was developed on the training set and validated on the testing set by merging numerous base estimators and a final estimator based on the stacking method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, precision, and the f1 score were evaluated to determine the performance of the model. A total of 1790 radiomics features and 8 traditional risk factors were contained in the original dataset, and 241 features remained for model training after L1 regularization filtering. The base estimator of the ensemble model was Logistic Regression, whereas the final estimator was Random Forest. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.982 (0.967-0.996) and 0.893 (0.826-0.960) in the testing set. This study indicated that radiomics features are a valuable addition to traditional risk factors for predicting bAVM rupture. In the meantime, ensemble learning can effectively improve the performance of a prediction model.

Abstract Image

结合传统风险因素预测脑动静脉畸形破裂的 CT 血管造影放射组学:一项机器学习多中心研究。
本研究旨在结合传统风险因素和放射组学特征,开发一种预测脑动静脉畸形(bAVM)破裂的机器学习模型。这项多中心回顾性研究从2010年到2020年共纳入了586名未破裂的脑动静脉畸形患者。所有患者被分为出血组(368人)和非出血组(218人)。使用Slicer软件对CT血管造影图像上的bAVM瘤巢进行分割,并使用Pyradiomics提取放射学特征。数据集包括训练集和独立测试集。机器学习模型是在训练集上建立的,并通过合并多个基础估计器和基于堆叠法的最终估计器在测试集上进行了验证。通过评估接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积、精确度和 f1 分数来确定模型的性能。原始数据集中共包含 1790 个放射组学特征和 8 个传统风险因素,经过 L1 正则化过滤后,模型训练还剩下 241 个特征。集合模型的基础估计器是逻辑回归,而最终估计器是随机森林。在训练集中,模型的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.982(0.967-0.996),在测试集中为 0.893(0.826-0.960)。这项研究表明,放射组学特征是对传统风险因素的一种有价值的补充,可用于预测主动脉瘤破裂。同时,集合学习能有效提高预测模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信