Recreational use of oral erectile dysfunction medications among male physicians - A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_33_22
Raed Almannie, Meshari A Alzahrani, Mana Almuhaideb, Ibrahim Abunohaiah, Mohamad Habous, Saleh Binsaleh
{"title":"Recreational use of oral erectile dysfunction medications among male physicians - A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Raed Almannie,&nbsp;Meshari A Alzahrani,&nbsp;Mana Almuhaideb,&nbsp;Ibrahim Abunohaiah,&nbsp;Mohamad Habous,&nbsp;Saleh Binsaleh","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_33_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance. Bypassing health-care providers and obtaining ED medications (EDM) without a prescription are an issue that is faced globally.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We attempt to assess erectile function (EF) among a local sample of physicians, the psychological effects of recreational EDM use, and compare EF among different user groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study done solely on physicians in Saudi Arabia. A self-designed questionnaire including demographics, sexual characteristics, use of ED medication, sexual satisfaction, and the validated international index of EF (IIEF).</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Physicians misused EDM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 503 physicians completed the questionnaire. Among participants reporting sexual problems, only 23% received counseling and 3.4% were professionally diagnosed with ED. Among users, 71.2% were using EDM recreationally, 14.4% prophylactically, and 14.4% were prescribed. Participants aged 20-29 IIEF-5 score was significantly lower than participants aged 30-39 years. Prescribed users had a lower IIEF-5 score compared to both recreational users and nonusers.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Many healthy sexually active men use EDMs recreationally to increase sexual performance.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>One of the limitations of our study is that we did not use standardized tools to determine the diagnosis of some important disorders like premature ejaculation. Our study strengths include the very high response rate, with our results truly showing a nationwide self-assessment of sexual dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recreational use of oral EDMs may adversely impact the psychological aspects of sexual function. In our study, physicians misused EDM. We recommend labeling EDMs as restricted medication that requires a prescription to use by a licensed physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"15 2","pages":"148-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/2b/UA-15-148.PMC10252768.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_33_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the persistent inability to attain and maintain an erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance. Bypassing health-care providers and obtaining ED medications (EDM) without a prescription are an issue that is faced globally.

Aim: We attempt to assess erectile function (EF) among a local sample of physicians, the psychological effects of recreational EDM use, and compare EF among different user groups.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study done solely on physicians in Saudi Arabia. A self-designed questionnaire including demographics, sexual characteristics, use of ED medication, sexual satisfaction, and the validated international index of EF (IIEF).

Outcome: Physicians misused EDM.

Results: A total of 503 physicians completed the questionnaire. Among participants reporting sexual problems, only 23% received counseling and 3.4% were professionally diagnosed with ED. Among users, 71.2% were using EDM recreationally, 14.4% prophylactically, and 14.4% were prescribed. Participants aged 20-29 IIEF-5 score was significantly lower than participants aged 30-39 years. Prescribed users had a lower IIEF-5 score compared to both recreational users and nonusers.

Clinical implications: Many healthy sexually active men use EDMs recreationally to increase sexual performance.

Strengths and limitations: One of the limitations of our study is that we did not use standardized tools to determine the diagnosis of some important disorders like premature ejaculation. Our study strengths include the very high response rate, with our results truly showing a nationwide self-assessment of sexual dysfunction.

Conclusion: Recreational use of oral EDMs may adversely impact the psychological aspects of sexual function. In our study, physicians misused EDM. We recommend labeling EDMs as restricted medication that requires a prescription to use by a licensed physician.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

男性医生娱乐性使用口服勃起功能障碍药物——一项横断面研究。
引言:勃起功能障碍(ED)是指持续无法达到和维持足以让人满意的性行为的勃起。绕过医疗保健提供者和在没有处方的情况下获得ED药物是全球面临的一个问题。目的:我们试图在当地医生样本中评估勃起功能(EF),娱乐性EDM使用的心理影响,并比较不同用户群体的EF。方法:这是一项仅针对沙特阿拉伯医生的横断面研究。一份自行设计的问卷,包括人口统计学、性特征、ED药物的使用、性满意度和经验证的国际EF指数。结果:医生滥用EDM。结果:共有503名医生完成了问卷。在报告性问题的参与者中,只有23%的人接受了咨询,3.4%的人被专业诊断为ED。在使用者中,71.2%的人娱乐性地使用EDM,14.4%的人预防性地使用,14.4%是处方药。20-29岁的参与者IIEF-5得分显著低于30-39岁的参与者。与娱乐性使用者和非使用者相比,处方使用者的IIEF-5得分较低。临床意义:许多性活跃的健康男性娱乐性地使用EDM来提高性表现。优势和局限性:我们研究的局限性之一是,我们没有使用标准化的工具来确定一些重要疾病的诊断,如早泄。我们的研究优势包括非常高的反应率,我们的结果真正显示了全国性的性功能障碍自我评估。结论:娱乐性使用口服EDM可能会对性功能的心理方面产生不利影响。在我们的研究中,医生滥用EDM。我们建议将EDM标记为限制性药物,需要由持照医生开具处方才能使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信