Households' vulnerability assessment: empirical evidence from cyclone-prone area of Bangladesh.

IF 4 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geoscience Letters Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1186/s40562-023-00280-z
Md Mostafizur Rahman, Md Saidul Islam Arif, Md Tanvir Hossain, Hussein Almohamad, Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi, Motrih Al-Mutiry, Hazem Ghassan Abdo
{"title":"Households' vulnerability assessment: empirical evidence from cyclone-prone area of Bangladesh.","authors":"Md Mostafizur Rahman,&nbsp;Md Saidul Islam Arif,&nbsp;Md Tanvir Hossain,&nbsp;Hussein Almohamad,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdullah Al Dughairi,&nbsp;Motrih Al-Mutiry,&nbsp;Hazem Ghassan Abdo","doi":"10.1186/s40562-023-00280-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite Bangladesh being vulnerable to cyclones, there is a dearth of research on cyclone vulnerability assessment. Assessing a household's vulnerability is considered a crucial step in avoiding the adverse effects of catastrophe risks. This research was conducted in the cyclone-prone district of Barguna, Bangladesh. This study's purpose is to evaluate this region's vulnerability. A questionnaire survey was conducted using a convenience sample technique. A door-to-door survey of 388 households in two Unions of Patharghata Upazila, Barguna district, was conducted. Forty-three indicators were selected to assess cyclone vulnerability. The results were quantified using an index-based methodology with a standardized scoring method. Where applicable, descriptive statistics have been obtained. In terms of vulnerability indicators, we also utilized the chi-square test to compare Kalmegha and Patharghata Union. When appropriate, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was employed to evaluate the relationship between the Vulnerability Index Score (VIS) and the union. According to the results, the environmental vulnerability (0.53 ± 0.17) and the composite vulnerability index (0.50 ± 0.08) were significantly greater in Kalmegha Union than in Patharghata Union. They faced inequity in government assistance (71%) and humanitarian aid (45%) from national and international organizations. However, 83% of them underwent evacuation practices. 39% were satisfied with the WASH conditions at the cyclone shelter, whereas around half were dissatisfied with the status of the medical facilities. Most of them (96%) rely only on surface water for drinking. National and international organizations should have a comprehensive plan for disaster risk reduction that encompasses all individuals, regardless of race, geography, or ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48596,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243237/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-023-00280-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite Bangladesh being vulnerable to cyclones, there is a dearth of research on cyclone vulnerability assessment. Assessing a household's vulnerability is considered a crucial step in avoiding the adverse effects of catastrophe risks. This research was conducted in the cyclone-prone district of Barguna, Bangladesh. This study's purpose is to evaluate this region's vulnerability. A questionnaire survey was conducted using a convenience sample technique. A door-to-door survey of 388 households in two Unions of Patharghata Upazila, Barguna district, was conducted. Forty-three indicators were selected to assess cyclone vulnerability. The results were quantified using an index-based methodology with a standardized scoring method. Where applicable, descriptive statistics have been obtained. In terms of vulnerability indicators, we also utilized the chi-square test to compare Kalmegha and Patharghata Union. When appropriate, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was employed to evaluate the relationship between the Vulnerability Index Score (VIS) and the union. According to the results, the environmental vulnerability (0.53 ± 0.17) and the composite vulnerability index (0.50 ± 0.08) were significantly greater in Kalmegha Union than in Patharghata Union. They faced inequity in government assistance (71%) and humanitarian aid (45%) from national and international organizations. However, 83% of them underwent evacuation practices. 39% were satisfied with the WASH conditions at the cyclone shelter, whereas around half were dissatisfied with the status of the medical facilities. Most of them (96%) rely only on surface water for drinking. National and international organizations should have a comprehensive plan for disaster risk reduction that encompasses all individuals, regardless of race, geography, or ethnicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

家庭脆弱性评估:来自孟加拉国气旋易发地区的经验证据。
尽管孟加拉国易受气旋影响,但对气旋脆弱性评估的研究却很少。评估家庭的脆弱性被认为是避免灾难风险不利影响的关键一步。这项研究是在孟加拉国巴尔古纳易受气旋影响的地区进行的。本研究的目的是评估该地区的脆弱性。采用方便抽样技术进行了问卷调查。对Barguna区Patharghata-Upazila两个工会的388户家庭进行了挨家挨户的调查。选择了43个指标来评估气旋的脆弱性。使用基于指数的方法和标准化评分方法对结果进行量化。在适用的情况下,已获得描述性统计数据。在脆弱性指标方面,我们还利用卡方检验对Kalmegha和Patharghata联盟进行了比较。在适当的情况下,采用非参数Mann-Whitney U检验来评估脆弱性指数得分(VIS)与工会之间的关系。根据结果,环境脆弱性(0.53 ± 0.17)和综合脆弱性指数(0.50 ± 0.08)在Kalmegha联盟显著大于在Patharghata联盟。他们在政府援助(71%)和来自国家和国际组织的人道主义援助(45%)方面面临不公平。然而,其中83%的人进行了疏散。39%的人对飓风避难所的讲卫生条件感到满意,而大约一半的人对医疗设施的状况感到不满。他们中的大多数人(96%)只依靠地表水饮用。国家和国际组织应制定一项全面的减少灾害风险计划,包括所有个人,不分种族、地理或民族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience Letters
Geoscience Letters Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
42
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geoscience Letters is the official journal of the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society, and a fully open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal publishes original, innovative and timely research letter articles and concise reviews on studies of the Earth and its environment, the planetary and space sciences. Contributions reflect the eight scientific sections of the AOGS: Atmospheric Sciences, Biogeosciences, Hydrological Sciences, Interdisciplinary Geosciences, Ocean Sciences, Planetary Sciences, Solar and Terrestrial Sciences, and Solid Earth Sciences. Geoscience Letters focuses on cutting-edge fundamental and applied research in the broad field of the geosciences, including the applications of geoscience research to societal problems. This journal is Open Access, providing rapid electronic publication of high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信