Maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior Cesarean section in Baghdad

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shaymaa Kadhim Jasim, Hayder Al-Momen, Maisaa Anees Wahbi, Rand Almomen
{"title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior Cesarean section in Baghdad","authors":"Shaymaa Kadhim Jasim,&nbsp;Hayder Al-Momen,&nbsp;Maisaa Anees Wahbi,&nbsp;Rand Almomen","doi":"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Repeat adolescent pregnancy is a hot topic worldwide and imposes a challenge on the health system, especially when faced with limited resources. We aimed to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior cesarean section (CS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Singleton adolescent pregnant women with one prior CS scar were recruited and divided into two groups based on the obstetric decision for delivery and/or mother’s wish, either trial of labor (TL) or elective cesarean section (ECS). If TL failed, an emergency CS was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 109 involved women, TL and ECS groups included 78 (71.6%) and 31 (28.4%) women, respectively. Emergency CS was done for 57 (52.3%) women from the TL group, leaving only 21 (19.3%) women with successful TL who had statistically significant (non-recurrent) indications of the prior CS [12 (57.1%)]. Malpresentation (n=24; 77.4%) was the major indication in the ECS group, while fetal distress (n=29; 50.9%) was the main cause of failed TL. Total maternal morbidities in the TL group were significantly higher for adjusted [1.5 (1.1-4.2)] and non-adjusted odds ratios (OR) [2.4 (1.6-5.6)]. Neonatal complications, such as admission to neonatal intensive care unit, were higher in the TL group without reaching significance. However, the adjusted OR [1.9 (1.1-3.3)] for perinatal asphyxia was significantly increased in TL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maternal morbidities and perinatal asphyxia were significantly higher in the TL group of adolescent women compared with the ECS group in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/3b/JTGGA-24-86.PMC10258566.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Repeat adolescent pregnancy is a hot topic worldwide and imposes a challenge on the health system, especially when faced with limited resources. We aimed to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnant women with one prior cesarean section (CS).

Material and methods: Singleton adolescent pregnant women with one prior CS scar were recruited and divided into two groups based on the obstetric decision for delivery and/or mother’s wish, either trial of labor (TL) or elective cesarean section (ECS). If TL failed, an emergency CS was performed.

Results: Out of the total 109 involved women, TL and ECS groups included 78 (71.6%) and 31 (28.4%) women, respectively. Emergency CS was done for 57 (52.3%) women from the TL group, leaving only 21 (19.3%) women with successful TL who had statistically significant (non-recurrent) indications of the prior CS [12 (57.1%)]. Malpresentation (n=24; 77.4%) was the major indication in the ECS group, while fetal distress (n=29; 50.9%) was the main cause of failed TL. Total maternal morbidities in the TL group were significantly higher for adjusted [1.5 (1.1-4.2)] and non-adjusted odds ratios (OR) [2.4 (1.6-5.6)]. Neonatal complications, such as admission to neonatal intensive care unit, were higher in the TL group without reaching significance. However, the adjusted OR [1.9 (1.1-3.3)] for perinatal asphyxia was significantly increased in TL group.

Conclusion: Maternal morbidities and perinatal asphyxia were significantly higher in the TL group of adolescent women compared with the ECS group in this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴格达曾做过一次剖宫产的少女孕妇的产妇和新生儿结局
目的:青少年重复怀孕是一个世界性的热点问题,对卫生系统提出了挑战,特别是在资源有限的情况下。我们的目的是评估有一次剖宫产史(CS)的青春期孕妇的产妇和新生儿结局。材料和方法:招募既往有一个CS疤痕的单胎青少年孕妇,并根据分娩决定和/或母亲的意愿分为两组,试产(TL)或选择性剖宫产(ECS)。如果TL失败,则执行紧急CS。结果:109例患者中,TL组和ECS组分别有78例(71.6%)和31例(28.4%)。TL组的57名(52.3%)女性进行了紧急CS,仅剩下21名(19.3%)成功的TL患者有统计学意义(非复发)的既往CS指征[12名(57.1%)]。先露异常(n = 24;77.4%)是ECS组的主要指征,胎儿窘迫(n=29;(50.9%)是TL失败的主要原因。TL组的总产妇发病率在校正[1.5(1.1-4.2)]和未校正的比值比(OR)[2.4(1.6-5.6)]均显著高于TL组。新生儿并发症,如入院新生儿重症监护病房,在TL组较高,但没有达到显著性。而TL组围产期窒息的校正OR[1.9(1.1-3.3)]明显升高。结论:本研究中TL组青少年妇女的孕产妇发病率和围产期窒息明显高于ECS组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is the official, open access publication of the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation and Turkish-German Gynecological Association and is published quarterly on March, June, September and December. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English language. Manuscripts are reviewed in accordance with “double-blind peer review” process for both reviewers and authors. The target audience of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association includes gynecologists and primary care physicians interested in gynecology practice. It publishes original works on all aspects of obstertrics and gynecology. The aim of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is to publish high quality original research articles. In addition to research articles, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, diagnostic puzzle are also published. Suggestions for new books are also welcomed. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association does not charge any fee for article submission or processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信