Corrigendum to "Detecting Prejudice From Egalitarianism: Why Black Americans Don't Trust White Egalitarians' Claims".

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"Detecting Prejudice From Egalitarianism: Why Black Americans Don't Trust White Egalitarians' Claims\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/09567976231160773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has been revised and republished due to substantial changes to the text of the original article, as published Online First on April 28, 2022. The article was revised after authors, Michael Rosenblum, Drew Jacoby-Senghor, and Derek Brown, contacted the journal on October 28, 2022 to express concerns about data inaccuracies in Experiments 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 referenced in the original Online First article. The authors first found that an incorrect variable was used in the analyses for Table 1 and then subsequently conducted a full audit of all studies in the paper. All errors discovered through this process were under the sole purview of Rosenblum’s contributions to the paper. After reviewing the results of the audited studies, authors Rosenblum, Jacoby-Senghor, and Brown, submitted revisions, as well as all data, to Psychologi cal Science’s Editor-in-Chief. The paper was then reviewed by them as well as a Senior and an Associate editor. The revisions in the republished article are intended to clearly update the results of the studies. Tables 1, 3 and 4, and Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6 have been updated with the results of the audited studies, as have the relevant references to these analyses in the text. Figure 2 has also been removed as it was found to be extraneous as it depicts non-significant results. The number of stimuli used in Experiment 1b has been corrected. Additionally, a new paragraph in the general discussion has been added to discuss newly apparent limitations of the paper. Due to the substantial number of edits necessary to address the above revisions, the journal determined republication of the article would allow readers to follow the article more effectively than a separate notice of the changes. Appended to the end of this republication notice is a watermarked version of the Online First article as published on April 28, 2022, so that interested readers may reference the original version of the article and note changes. 1160773 PSSXXX10.1177/09567976231160773 correction2023","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"736"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231160773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article has been revised and republished due to substantial changes to the text of the original article, as published Online First on April 28, 2022. The article was revised after authors, Michael Rosenblum, Drew Jacoby-Senghor, and Derek Brown, contacted the journal on October 28, 2022 to express concerns about data inaccuracies in Experiments 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 referenced in the original Online First article. The authors first found that an incorrect variable was used in the analyses for Table 1 and then subsequently conducted a full audit of all studies in the paper. All errors discovered through this process were under the sole purview of Rosenblum’s contributions to the paper. After reviewing the results of the audited studies, authors Rosenblum, Jacoby-Senghor, and Brown, submitted revisions, as well as all data, to Psychologi cal Science’s Editor-in-Chief. The paper was then reviewed by them as well as a Senior and an Associate editor. The revisions in the republished article are intended to clearly update the results of the studies. Tables 1, 3 and 4, and Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6 have been updated with the results of the audited studies, as have the relevant references to these analyses in the text. Figure 2 has also been removed as it was found to be extraneous as it depicts non-significant results. The number of stimuli used in Experiment 1b has been corrected. Additionally, a new paragraph in the general discussion has been added to discuss newly apparent limitations of the paper. Due to the substantial number of edits necessary to address the above revisions, the journal determined republication of the article would allow readers to follow the article more effectively than a separate notice of the changes. Appended to the end of this republication notice is a watermarked version of the Online First article as published on April 28, 2022, so that interested readers may reference the original version of the article and note changes. 1160773 PSSXXX10.1177/09567976231160773 correction2023
《从平等主义中发现偏见:为什么美国黑人不相信白人平等主义者的主张》的更正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信