Travel patterns of patients seeking cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Multi-centre cohort study in Osaka, Japan

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mari Kajiwara Saito, Toshitaka Morishima, Chaochen Ma, Shihoko Koyama, Isao Miyashiro
{"title":"Travel patterns of patients seeking cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Multi-centre cohort study in Osaka, Japan","authors":"Mari Kajiwara Saito,&nbsp;Toshitaka Morishima,&nbsp;Chaochen Ma,&nbsp;Shihoko Koyama,&nbsp;Isao Miyashiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Japan, provision of equal access to cancer care is intended to be achieved via secondary medical areas (SMAs). However, the percentage of patients receiving care within the residential area varies by SMA in Osaka Prefecture. We aimed to assess the effect size of factors associated with patient mobility, and whether patient mobility was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Records of patients diagnosed with stomach, colorectal, lung, breast, cervical, oesophageal, liver or pancreatic cancer during 2019–2020 were extracted from multi-centre hospital-based cancer registry data. Odds ratios of whether a patient received care within the SMA of residence were set as the outcome. A multivariable model was built using generalised estimating equations with multiple imputation for missing data. Change in patient mobility after the pandemic was examined by deriving age- and SMA-specific adjusted ORs (aORs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 78,839 records were included. Older age, more advanced stage and palliative care had up to 1.69 times higher aORs of receiving care within their own area. Patients with oesophageal, liver or pancreatic cancer tended to travel outside their area with aORs ranging from 0.71 to 0.90. Patients aged ≤ 79 and living in the East and South SMAs tended to remain in their area with aORs ranging from 1.05 to 1.11 after the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patient mobility decreased for higher age and stage. It also varied by SMA, cancer site and treatment type.</p></div><div><h3>Policy Summary</h3><p>Our results need to be linked with resource inputs to help policymakers decide whether to intervene to address current efficiency or equity issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Japan, provision of equal access to cancer care is intended to be achieved via secondary medical areas (SMAs). However, the percentage of patients receiving care within the residential area varies by SMA in Osaka Prefecture. We aimed to assess the effect size of factors associated with patient mobility, and whether patient mobility was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Records of patients diagnosed with stomach, colorectal, lung, breast, cervical, oesophageal, liver or pancreatic cancer during 2019–2020 were extracted from multi-centre hospital-based cancer registry data. Odds ratios of whether a patient received care within the SMA of residence were set as the outcome. A multivariable model was built using generalised estimating equations with multiple imputation for missing data. Change in patient mobility after the pandemic was examined by deriving age- and SMA-specific adjusted ORs (aORs).

Results

A total of 78,839 records were included. Older age, more advanced stage and palliative care had up to 1.69 times higher aORs of receiving care within their own area. Patients with oesophageal, liver or pancreatic cancer tended to travel outside their area with aORs ranging from 0.71 to 0.90. Patients aged ≤ 79 and living in the East and South SMAs tended to remain in their area with aORs ranging from 1.05 to 1.11 after the pandemic.

Conclusion

Patient mobility decreased for higher age and stage. It also varied by SMA, cancer site and treatment type.

Policy Summary

Our results need to be linked with resource inputs to help policymakers decide whether to intervene to address current efficiency or equity issues.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新冠肺炎大流行期间寻求癌症治疗的患者旅行模式:日本大阪多中心队列研究
背景在日本,旨在通过二级医疗区(SMA)实现平等获得癌症治疗。然而,在大阪府,居住区内接受护理的患者比例因SMA而异。我们旨在评估与患者流动性相关的因素的影响大小,以及患者流动性是否受到新冠肺炎大流行的影响。方法从基于多中心医院的癌症登记数据中提取2019-2020年期间诊断为胃癌、结直肠癌、肺癌、乳腺癌、宫颈癌、食道癌、肝癌或胰腺癌的癌症患者的记录。患者是否在SMA居住区内接受护理的比值比被设定为结果。使用广义估计方程建立多变量模型,并对缺失数据进行多重插补。通过推导年龄和SMA特异性调整ORs(aORs)来检查疫情后患者行动能力的变化。结果共纳入78839条记录。年龄较大、晚期和姑息治疗在其所在地区接受治疗的aOR高达1.69倍。患有食道癌、肝癌或胰腺癌的癌症患者往往在其区域外旅行,aOR范围在0.71至0.90之间。年龄≤79岁且居住在东部和南部SMA的患者在疫情后倾向于留在他们的地区,aOR在1.05至1.11之间。结论随着年龄和分期的增加,患者活动能力下降。它也因SMA、癌症部位和治疗类型而异。政策摘要我们的结果需要与资源投入联系起来,以帮助决策者决定是否进行干预,以解决当前的效率或公平问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信