Changes in stiffness at active myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius after dry needling in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Juan Antonio Valera-Calero, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, Umut Varol, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Javier Álvarez-González
{"title":"Changes in stiffness at active myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius after dry needling in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Juan Antonio Valera-Calero,&nbsp;Sandra Sánchez-Jorge,&nbsp;Jorge Buffet-García,&nbsp;Umut Varol,&nbsp;César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas,&nbsp;Javier Álvarez-González","doi":"10.1177/09645284221104831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Since, to our knowledge, the effects of dry needling (DN) on active myofascial trigger point (MTrP) stiffness have not been analyzed previously with shear wave elastography (SWE), our aim was to compare the effects of a single session of DN and sham DN applied to the most active MTrP located in the upper trapezius muscle on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled trial was conducted; 60 patients were randomized into an experimental (DN) or sham (sham DN) group. Baseline data including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. SWE and pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) at the MTrP and a control point located 3 cm laterally were the main outcomes assessed before and 10 min after the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving DN interventions experienced greater increases in the control point PPTs immediately after receiving the intervention compared with sham DN (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but no differences were found for the MTrP (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Post-intervention PPT improvements were found at both locations for both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01). No significant changes for either MTrP or control locations were found for SWE outcomes in either group (all <i>p</i>s > 0.05). No significant within-group SWE differences were found in the DN or sham DN groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A single session of DN or sham DN applied to active MTrPs located in the upper trapezius muscle produced no detectable changes in stiffness at the MTrP or control locations. Real DN induced an immediate analgesic response at both MTrP and control locations, while sham DN induced an immediate MTrP response.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04832074 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":7257,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09645284221104831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background/objective: Since, to our knowledge, the effects of dry needling (DN) on active myofascial trigger point (MTrP) stiffness have not been analyzed previously with shear wave elastography (SWE), our aim was to compare the effects of a single session of DN and sham DN applied to the most active MTrP located in the upper trapezius muscle on clinical outcomes.

Methods: A randomized, double-blinded sham-controlled trial was conducted; 60 patients were randomized into an experimental (DN) or sham (sham DN) group. Baseline data including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. SWE and pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) at the MTrP and a control point located 3 cm laterally were the main outcomes assessed before and 10 min after the interventions.

Results: Patients receiving DN interventions experienced greater increases in the control point PPTs immediately after receiving the intervention compared with sham DN (p < 0.05), but no differences were found for the MTrP (p > 0.05). Post-intervention PPT improvements were found at both locations for both groups (p < 0.01). No significant changes for either MTrP or control locations were found for SWE outcomes in either group (all ps > 0.05). No significant within-group SWE differences were found in the DN or sham DN groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: A single session of DN or sham DN applied to active MTrPs located in the upper trapezius muscle produced no detectable changes in stiffness at the MTrP or control locations. Real DN induced an immediate analgesic response at both MTrP and control locations, while sham DN induced an immediate MTrP response.

Trial registration number: NCT04832074 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

慢性颈部疼痛患者干针刺后斜方肌上部肌筋膜触发点僵硬度的变化:一项随机对照试验。
背景/目的:据我们所知,干针(DN)对活跃肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)刚度的影响尚未被剪切波弹性成像(SWE)分析过,我们的目的是比较单次干针(DN)和假干针(DN)对位于斜方肌上部最活跃的MTrP的临床结果的影响。方法:采用随机、双盲、假对照试验;60例患者随机分为实验组(DN)和假手术组(sham DN)。收集基线数据,包括社会人口学和临床特征。在干预前和干预后10分钟评估MTrP和位于3cm外侧的控制点的SWE和痛压阈值(PPTs)。结果:与假性DN相比,接受DN干预的患者在接受干预后立即出现更大的控制点PPTs升高(p < 0.05),但MTrP无差异(p > 0.05)。干预后两组两部位PPT均有改善(p < 0.01)。两组的MTrP或对照位置对SWE结果均无显著变化(均p > 0.05)。DN组和假性DN组SWE组内差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:将单次DN或假DN应用于位于上斜方肌的活性MTrP,在MTrP或对照位置的僵硬度没有可检测到的变化。真DN在MTrP和对照部位均引起立即的镇痛反应,而假DN则引起立即的MTrP反应。试验注册号:NCT04832074 (ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acupuncture in Medicine
Acupuncture in Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acupuncture in Medicine aims to promote the scientific understanding of acupuncture and related treatments by publishing scientific investigations of their effectiveness and modes of action as well as articles on their use in health services and clinical practice. Acupuncture in Medicine uses the Western understanding of neurophysiology and anatomy to interpret the effects of acupuncture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信