Perceptions of preparedness, timing of cancer diagnosis, and objective emergency preparedness among gynecological cancer patients in Puerto Rico before and after Hurricane Maria

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Meghan Johnson , Humberto Parada Jr , Karen Ferran , Ramona Perez , William Calo , Istoni da Luz Sant'Ana , Liz Martínez Ocasio , Pablo A. Mendez-Lazaro , Sandra I. Garcia , Guillermo Tortolero-Luna , Sharee A. Umpierre , Ana Patricia Ortiz
{"title":"Perceptions of preparedness, timing of cancer diagnosis, and objective emergency preparedness among gynecological cancer patients in Puerto Rico before and after Hurricane Maria","authors":"Meghan Johnson ,&nbsp;Humberto Parada Jr ,&nbsp;Karen Ferran ,&nbsp;Ramona Perez ,&nbsp;William Calo ,&nbsp;Istoni da Luz Sant'Ana ,&nbsp;Liz Martínez Ocasio ,&nbsp;Pablo A. Mendez-Lazaro ,&nbsp;Sandra I. Garcia ,&nbsp;Guillermo Tortolero-Luna ,&nbsp;Sharee A. Umpierre ,&nbsp;Ana Patricia Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study investigated the impact of cancer diagnosis status, individual feelings of preparedness, and other covariates on objective emergency preparedness among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers before or after the 2017 Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included 240 women who were interviewed by telephone from 9/2019–11/2020. Objective emergency preparedness was assessed using a list of six items. Subjective emergency preparedness was assessed by asking the women how prepared they felt (well, somewhat, or not at all) to face an emergency. Crude and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between variables of interest and objective preparedness.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Before and after the hurricanes, 60% and 66% of women, respectively, were objectively prepared. Before the hurricanes, women reporting feeling well-prepared (vs. not prepared) (OR=9.31, 95%CI:3.96–21.91) and those who were diagnosed before (vs. after) the hurricanes (OR=1.71, 95%CI:0.95–3.09) were more likely to be objectively prepared. After the hurricanes, self-perceived well-preparedness (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 1.10–5.51) was positively associated with emergency preparedness when compared to feeling unprepared.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Perceptions of emergency preparedness and having a cancer diagnosis increased the likelihood of being objectively prepared for an emergency.</p></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><p>This study demonstrates the need for state, territorial, and federal governments to include emergency preparedness plans for cancer patients in the Comprehensive Cancer Control plans. The study also indicates a need for cancer specific emergency preparedness information to be readily available for patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigated the impact of cancer diagnosis status, individual feelings of preparedness, and other covariates on objective emergency preparedness among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers before or after the 2017 Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico.

Methods

This study included 240 women who were interviewed by telephone from 9/2019–11/2020. Objective emergency preparedness was assessed using a list of six items. Subjective emergency preparedness was assessed by asking the women how prepared they felt (well, somewhat, or not at all) to face an emergency. Crude and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between variables of interest and objective preparedness.

Results

Before and after the hurricanes, 60% and 66% of women, respectively, were objectively prepared. Before the hurricanes, women reporting feeling well-prepared (vs. not prepared) (OR=9.31, 95%CI:3.96–21.91) and those who were diagnosed before (vs. after) the hurricanes (OR=1.71, 95%CI:0.95–3.09) were more likely to be objectively prepared. After the hurricanes, self-perceived well-preparedness (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 1.10–5.51) was positively associated with emergency preparedness when compared to feeling unprepared.

Conclusions

Perceptions of emergency preparedness and having a cancer diagnosis increased the likelihood of being objectively prepared for an emergency.

Policy summary

This study demonstrates the need for state, territorial, and federal governments to include emergency preparedness plans for cancer patients in the Comprehensive Cancer Control plans. The study also indicates a need for cancer specific emergency preparedness information to be readily available for patients.

飓风玛丽亚前后波多黎各癌症妇科患者对癌症诊断的准备、时间和客观应急准备的认识
目的本研究调查了2017年波多黎各伊尔玛和玛丽亚飓风前后癌症诊断状况、个人准备感和其他协变量对诊断为妇科癌症的女性客观应急准备的影响。使用六项清单评估了目标应急准备情况。主观应急准备是通过询问女性面对紧急情况的准备程度(好的、有点或根本没有)来评估的。进行粗略和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估感兴趣的变量与客观准备之间的相关性(比值比[OR]和95%置信区间[CI])。结果在飓风前后,分别有60%和66%的女性有客观的心理准备。在飓风之前,报告感觉准备充分(与没有准备相比)的女性(OR=9.31,95%CI:3.96-21.91)和在飓风之前(与飓风之后)确诊的女性(OR=1.71,95%CI:0.95-3.09)更有可能客观地做好准备。飓风过后,与感觉没有准备相比,自我感知的良好准备(OR=2.46,95%CI:1.10-5.51)与应急准备呈正相关。结论急救意识和癌症诊断增加了客观准备急救的可能性。政策摘要本研究表明,州、地区和联邦政府需要将癌症患者的应急准备计划纳入癌症综合控制计划。该研究还表明,需要为患者提供癌症特定的应急准备信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信