Biological control of foodborne pathogens by lactic acid bacteria: A focus on juice processing industries

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
María Clara Tarifa , María del Rosario Agustín , Lorena Inés Brugnoni
{"title":"Biological control of foodborne pathogens by lactic acid bacteria: A focus on juice processing industries","authors":"María Clara Tarifa ,&nbsp;María del Rosario Agustín ,&nbsp;Lorena Inés Brugnoni","doi":"10.1016/j.ram.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in foods as biocontrol agents against foodborne pathogens has become increasingly known. Under the premise that controlling the adhesion of microorganisms to food contact surfaces is an essential step for meeting the goals of food processing, the aim of this work was to investigate the inhibitory and anti-biofilm effectiveness of <em>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</em> GG (ATCC 53103) and <em>Lactobacillus casei</em> (ATCC 393) against <em>Escherichia coli</em> O157:H7, <em>Salmonella enterica</em> and <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em>. <em>Lactobacillus</em> strains (10<sup>8</sup> <!-->CFU/ml) and pathogens (10<sup>4</sup> <!-->CFU/ml) were evaluated to monitor LAB anti-adhesive and antibiofilm effect, in two main scenarios: (i) co-adhesion and (ii) pathogen incorporation to stainless steel surfaces with a protective biofilm of <em>Lactobacillus</em> cells. In (i) the predominant effect was observed in <em>L. rhamnosus</em> against <em>S. enterica</em> and <em>L. monocytogenes,</em> whereas in (ii) both LAB significantly reduced the number of pathogenic adherent cells. The effect of pre-established LAB biofilms was more successful in displacing the three pathogens than when they were evaluated under co-adhesion. These findings show that both LAB can be considered good candidates to prevent or inhibit the adhesion and colonization of <em>L. monocytogenes</em>, <em>S. enterica</em> and <em>E. coli</em> O157:H7 on surfaces and conditions of relevance for juice processing industries, offering alternatives for improving the safety and quality of fruit-based products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000299/pdfft?md5=e02e9cc50d806ba75cb0e2ae728abcbc&pid=1-s2.0-S0325754123000299-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0325754123000299","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in foods as biocontrol agents against foodborne pathogens has become increasingly known. Under the premise that controlling the adhesion of microorganisms to food contact surfaces is an essential step for meeting the goals of food processing, the aim of this work was to investigate the inhibitory and anti-biofilm effectiveness of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) and Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 393) against Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes. Lactobacillus strains (108 CFU/ml) and pathogens (104 CFU/ml) were evaluated to monitor LAB anti-adhesive and antibiofilm effect, in two main scenarios: (i) co-adhesion and (ii) pathogen incorporation to stainless steel surfaces with a protective biofilm of Lactobacillus cells. In (i) the predominant effect was observed in L. rhamnosus against S. enterica and L. monocytogenes, whereas in (ii) both LAB significantly reduced the number of pathogenic adherent cells. The effect of pre-established LAB biofilms was more successful in displacing the three pathogens than when they were evaluated under co-adhesion. These findings show that both LAB can be considered good candidates to prevent or inhibit the adhesion and colonization of L. monocytogenes, S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7 on surfaces and conditions of relevance for juice processing industries, offering alternatives for improving the safety and quality of fruit-based products.

乳酸菌对食源性病原体的生物防治:聚焦果汁加工业
在食品中使用乳酸菌(LAB)作为生物控制剂来对抗食源性致病菌已越来越为人所知。控制微生物在食品接触表面的附着是实现食品加工目标的必要步骤,在此前提下,这项工作旨在研究鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(ATCC 53103)和干酪乳杆菌(ATCC 393)对大肠杆菌 O157:H7、肠炎沙门氏菌和单核细胞增生李斯特菌的抑制和抗生物膜效果。对乳酸杆菌菌株(108 CFU/ml)和病原体(104 CFU/ml)进行了评估,以监测 LAB 在两种主要情况下的抗粘附和抗生物膜效果:(i) 共同粘附;(ii) 病原体与带有乳酸杆菌细胞生物膜保护层的不锈钢表面结合。在(i)中,鼠李糖乳杆菌对肠炎双球菌和单核细胞增多性乳酸杆菌的作用占主导地位,而在(ii)中,两种 LAB 都能显著减少病原体附着细胞的数量。与在共同粘附情况下进行的评估相比,预先建立的 LAB 生物膜在驱除三种病原体方面的效果更为成功。这些研究结果表明,这两种 LAB 都可以被认为是防止或抑制单核细胞增多性乳酸杆菌、肠杆菌和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 在果汁加工业相关表面和条件上粘附和定殖的良好候选物,为提高水果类产品的安全和质量提供了替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信