Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Teeth with Root Resorption: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ashwini Manish Dadpe, Dipali Yogesh Shah, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Nivedhitha Malli Sureshbabu, Ajit Narayan Hindlekar, Kajal Modi
{"title":"Regenerative Endodontic Procedures in Teeth with Root Resorption: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ashwini Manish Dadpe, Dipali Yogesh Shah, Velmurugan Natanasabapathy, Nivedhitha Malli Sureshbabu, Ajit Narayan Hindlekar, Kajal Modi","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.77486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the available clinical literature on the use of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) for the treatment of root resorption. All case reports, case series and clinical studies documenting the management of root resorption in mature or immature permanent teeth using RET were included. Review articles, animal studies, and RET in teeth showing developmental anomalies were excluded. A literature search was conducted in electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from 2001 to January 2022. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist Quality was used to appraise the included case reports and case series. The Methodological item for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool was used to appraise the clinical study critically. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search resulted in 14 studies (12 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 clinical study) accounting for root resorption in 34 teeth from 29 patients treated with RET. Despite the wide variation in RET protocols, the arrest of root resorption and resolution of symptoms was seen in all teeth except one (failure after 27 months). The clinical study's cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging evalu- ation documented a significant volumetric decrease in resorptive and periapical lesions after RET. The clinical study was deemed as good quality using the MINORS scale. The JBI critical appraisal tool showed that the case series was of poor quality; 11 of the case reports were of good quality, while 1 case report was of fair quality. This systematic review revealed a low-to-moderate level of evidence for the use of RET in resorption cases. However, further well-designed, long-term clinical studies are required to recommend it as an alternative treatment option for root resorption management. Funding: None. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021274569). (EEJ-2022-11-136).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"170-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/1b/EEJ-8-170.PMC10244915.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.77486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the available clinical literature on the use of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) for the treatment of root resorption. All case reports, case series and clinical studies documenting the management of root resorption in mature or immature permanent teeth using RET were included. Review articles, animal studies, and RET in teeth showing developmental anomalies were excluded. A literature search was conducted in electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from 2001 to January 2022. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist Quality was used to appraise the included case reports and case series. The Methodological item for non-randomised studies (MINORS) tool was used to appraise the clinical study critically. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search resulted in 14 studies (12 case reports, 1 case series, and 1 clinical study) accounting for root resorption in 34 teeth from 29 patients treated with RET. Despite the wide variation in RET protocols, the arrest of root resorption and resolution of symptoms was seen in all teeth except one (failure after 27 months). The clinical study's cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging evalu- ation documented a significant volumetric decrease in resorptive and periapical lesions after RET. The clinical study was deemed as good quality using the MINORS scale. The JBI critical appraisal tool showed that the case series was of poor quality; 11 of the case reports were of good quality, while 1 case report was of fair quality. This systematic review revealed a low-to-moderate level of evidence for the use of RET in resorption cases. However, further well-designed, long-term clinical studies are required to recommend it as an alternative treatment option for root resorption management. Funding: None. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021274569). (EEJ-2022-11-136).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

根吸收牙的再生牙髓治疗程序:系统性综述。
本系统性综述的目的是批判性地评估关于使用再生牙髓疗法(RET)治疗牙根吸收的现有临床文献。所有记录了使用 RET 治疗成熟或不成熟恒牙牙根吸收的病例报告、系列病例和临床研究均被纳入其中。综述性文章、动物研究以及对发育异常的牙齿进行 RET 治疗的文章不包括在内。从 2001 年到 2022 年 1 月,我们在 MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane 和 Google Scholar 等电子数据库中进行了文献检索。对纳入的病例报告和系列病例采用 JBI 质量批判性评估核对表进行评估。非随机研究方法项目(MINORS)工具用于对临床研究进行批判性评估。在应用了纳入和排除标准后,共搜索到 14 项研究(12 项病例报告、1 项病例系列和 1 项临床研究),涉及 29 名接受 RET 治疗的患者的 34 颗牙齿的牙根吸收情况。尽管 RET 治疗方案差异很大,但除一颗牙齿(27 个月后失败)外,其他牙齿的牙根吸收都得到了抑制,症状也得到了缓解。临床研究的锥形束计算机断层扫描 (CBCT) 成像评估显示,RET 治疗后牙根吸收和根尖周病变的体积明显缩小。根据 MINORS 评分标准,该临床研究被认为质量良好。JBI批判性评价工具显示,病例系列研究质量较差;11份病例报告质量较好,1份病例报告质量一般。该系统综述显示,在吸收病例中使用 RET 的证据为中低水平。然而,要推荐它作为牙根吸收治疗的替代疗法,还需要进一步设计良好的长期临床研究。资金来源:无。该系统综述已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42021274569)。(EEJ-2022-11-136)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信