Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen, Gianluca Plotino, Ehab El-Sayed Hassanien, Mohammed Turky
{"title":"Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.","authors":"Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen, Gianluca Plotino, Ehab El-Sayed Hassanien, Mohammed Turky","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.37929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ec/EEJ-8-225.PMC10244914.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.37929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the success rate of retrieving separated instrument, the root canal volume changes using cone-beam computed tomography and the retrieval time using Ruddle's technique, Terauchi file retrieval kit (TFRK) and Endo Rescue kit.
Methods: Sixty human mandibular first molars were selected, and a 4-mm portion of #25/.04 rotary files were separated in the middle third of moderately curved mesio-buccal canals. Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): R group, in which separated files were retrieved according to Ruddle's technique; T group, in which separated files were retrieved using TFRK and E group, in which separated files were retrieved using Endo Rescue kit. Values were analyzed using IBM SPSS. Results presented as mean+-standard deviation and 95% confidence interval for the root canal volume and time and frequency (%) for success rate. Comparisons of differences in time, canal volume and success rate between groups were assessed.
Results: Retrieval was successful in R and T groups (70% and 80% respectively) without any significant difference between them (p=0.715), while E group hadn't any successful samples (0.0%) with significant difference compared to R and T groups (p<0.001, p<0.001). E group showed the highest increase in canal volume followed by R group, while T group exhibited the lowest increase in canal volume. There was no significant difference in the mean retrieval time between R and T groups (p=0.815).
Conclusion: TFRK provides a more conservative way for retrieval of separated instrument from the middle third of moderately curved canals. (EEJ-2023-01-01).