Dental radiology reporting status and recording frequency of reporting items in Korea.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jinwoo Choi
{"title":"Dental radiology reporting status and recording frequency of reporting items in Korea.","authors":"Jinwoo Choi","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the current dental radiology reporting methods and the recording rate of 10 mandatory reporting items in Korea.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An original online survey created using Google Forms was distributed to dental practitioners. The survey asked about the participants' age, experience, workplace, use of radiologic equipment, radiology reporting methods, and recording reporting items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 354 responses were analyzed. Radiologic reporting in dental charts was the most commonly used method for each modality. Four out of 10 mandatory items were recorded at a high rate, but the remaining 6 items had substantially lower recording rates, often below 50%. The participants who reported radiographic findings through other separate methods had higher item scores than those who wrote findings in dental charts (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiologic societies and dental associations should encourage the use of separate reports for radiographic examinations. Education regarding radiology reports and the justification for reporting items should be reinforced in dental schools, training courses on radiology, and the continuing education curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/b4/isd-53-35.PMC10060759.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the current dental radiology reporting methods and the recording rate of 10 mandatory reporting items in Korea.

Materials and methods: An original online survey created using Google Forms was distributed to dental practitioners. The survey asked about the participants' age, experience, workplace, use of radiologic equipment, radiology reporting methods, and recording reporting items.

Results: In total, 354 responses were analyzed. Radiologic reporting in dental charts was the most commonly used method for each modality. Four out of 10 mandatory items were recorded at a high rate, but the remaining 6 items had substantially lower recording rates, often below 50%. The participants who reported radiographic findings through other separate methods had higher item scores than those who wrote findings in dental charts (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Radiologic societies and dental associations should encourage the use of separate reports for radiographic examinations. Education regarding radiology reports and the justification for reporting items should be reinforced in dental schools, training courses on radiology, and the continuing education curriculum.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

韩国口腔放射学报告情况及报告项目记录频率。
目的:本研究调查了韩国现行的牙科放射学报告方法和10项强制性报告项目的记录率。材料和方法:使用谷歌表格创建的原始在线调查分发给牙科医生。调查询问了参与者的年龄、经验、工作场所、放射设备的使用、放射报告方法和记录报告项目。结果:共分析354份回复。在牙科图表中报告放射学是每种模式中最常用的方法。10个强制性项目中有4个项目的记录率很高,但其余6个项目的记录率明显较低,通常低于50%。通过其他单独方法报告放射检查结果的参与者比在牙科图表中记录结果的参与者的项目得分更高(结论:放射学会和牙科协会应鼓励使用单独的放射检查报告。应在牙科学校、放射学培训课程和继续教育课程中加强有关放射学报告的教育和报告项目的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信