The Outcome of Prescribing Antibiotics for the Management of Patients with Endodontic Infections.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Masoud Parirokh, Anahita Saffarzadeh, Nouzar Nakhaei, Paul Abbott
{"title":"The Outcome of Prescribing Antibiotics for the Management of Patients with Endodontic Infections.","authors":"Masoud Parirokh,&nbsp;Anahita Saffarzadeh,&nbsp;Nouzar Nakhaei,&nbsp;Paul Abbott","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.39306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and duration of antibiotic therapy with different regi- mens of antibiotics for patients presenting with primary and secondary endodontic infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a case series outcome study, all patients needing antibiotics due to endodontic infection were included. In patients with no history of hypersensitivity to penicillin, amoxicillin was used as the first-line antibiotic, followed by adding metronidazole if the symptoms did not show signs of recovery during the first 24 hours after prescribing the medication. If a patient did not respond to the combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole, amoxicillin was substituted with a parental penicillin G procaine. Patients who had sensitivity to penicillin received clindamycin. In cases where drainage was possible, the effect of the procedure on the success rate of antibiotic therapy was evaluated. All patients were asked to continue taking the antibiotic for up to two days following the relief of symptoms. Data were analysed by Chi-square, Fisher exact test, Indepen- dent t-test, and One-way ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a period of 6 years, 97 patients were eligible to be included in this study. In patients with no history of sensitivity to penicillin (95.9% of the patients), 52.7% of patients on amoxicillin and 43% of patients on amoxicillin plus metronidazole overcame the endodontic infections. In addition, drainage significantly increased the success rate of antibiotic therapy when amoxicillin was prescribed (p=0.046). There were no significant differences between the gender, age, type of tooth, need for primary or secondary endodontic treatment, previous history of infection, need for drainage or duration of antibiotic consumption (p>0.05), and the success of antibiotic prescription. However, patients who received a single antibiotic (either amoxi- cillin or clindamycin) had significantly shorter average times for the recovery of symptoms (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amoxicillin helped patients recover from endodontic infection symptoms in more than half of the cases. However, it is necessary to monitor the patients to understand if they should be needed further treatment, such as another antibiotic or drainage. (EEJ-2022-11-138).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/61/6d/EEJ-8-194.PMC10244919.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.39306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and duration of antibiotic therapy with different regi- mens of antibiotics for patients presenting with primary and secondary endodontic infections.

Methods: In a case series outcome study, all patients needing antibiotics due to endodontic infection were included. In patients with no history of hypersensitivity to penicillin, amoxicillin was used as the first-line antibiotic, followed by adding metronidazole if the symptoms did not show signs of recovery during the first 24 hours after prescribing the medication. If a patient did not respond to the combination of amoxicillin and metronidazole, amoxicillin was substituted with a parental penicillin G procaine. Patients who had sensitivity to penicillin received clindamycin. In cases where drainage was possible, the effect of the procedure on the success rate of antibiotic therapy was evaluated. All patients were asked to continue taking the antibiotic for up to two days following the relief of symptoms. Data were analysed by Chi-square, Fisher exact test, Indepen- dent t-test, and One-way ANOVA.

Results: Over a period of 6 years, 97 patients were eligible to be included in this study. In patients with no history of sensitivity to penicillin (95.9% of the patients), 52.7% of patients on amoxicillin and 43% of patients on amoxicillin plus metronidazole overcame the endodontic infections. In addition, drainage significantly increased the success rate of antibiotic therapy when amoxicillin was prescribed (p=0.046). There were no significant differences between the gender, age, type of tooth, need for primary or secondary endodontic treatment, previous history of infection, need for drainage or duration of antibiotic consumption (p>0.05), and the success of antibiotic prescription. However, patients who received a single antibiotic (either amoxi- cillin or clindamycin) had significantly shorter average times for the recovery of symptoms (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Amoxicillin helped patients recover from endodontic infection symptoms in more than half of the cases. However, it is necessary to monitor the patients to understand if they should be needed further treatment, such as another antibiotic or drainage. (EEJ-2022-11-138).

牙髓感染患者的抗生素治疗效果。
目的:本研究旨在评价不同抗生素治疗方案对原发性和继发性牙髓感染患者的疗效和持续时间。方法:在一个病例系列结果研究中,所有因根管感染而需要抗生素治疗的患者都被纳入研究对象。对于无青霉素超敏史的患者,使用阿莫西林作为一线抗生素,如果在用药后24小时内症状未显示恢复迹象,则添加甲硝唑。如果患者对阿莫西林和甲硝唑联合用药无反应,则用母体青霉素G普鲁卡因代替阿莫西林。对青霉素敏感的患者接受克林霉素治疗。在可能引流的情况下,评估手术对抗生素治疗成功率的影响。所有患者都被要求在症状缓解后继续服用抗生素长达两天。数据分析采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、独立t检验和单因素方差分析。结果:在6年的时间里,97例患者符合纳入本研究的条件。在无青霉素敏感史的患者中(95.9%),52.7%的阿莫西林患者和43%的阿莫西林加甲硝唑患者克服了牙髓感染。此外,在使用阿莫西林时,引流显著提高了抗生素治疗的成功率(p=0.046)。性别、年龄、牙型、一次或二次根管治疗需求、感染史、引流需求、抗生素使用时间、抗生素处方成功率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,接受单一抗生素(阿莫西林或克林霉素)的患者症状恢复的平均时间明显缩短(结论:阿莫西林帮助超过一半的患者从牙髓感染症状中恢复。然而,有必要对患者进行监测,以了解他们是否需要进一步治疗,如另一种抗生素或引流。(eej - 2022 - 11 - 138)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信