Chapitre 7. Les enjeux de l’aide médicale à mourir en contexte de sclérose latérale amyotrophique : une revue de la littérature.

Caroline Favron-Godbout, Eric Racine
{"title":"Chapitre 7. Les enjeux de l’aide médicale à mourir en contexte de sclérose latérale amyotrophique : une revue de la littérature.","authors":"Caroline Favron-Godbout,&nbsp;Eric Racine","doi":"10.3917/jibes.333.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that leads some people with the disease to consider medical assistance in dying (MAiD). In this article, we describe how a variety of moral problems can emerge from this particular context and affect the well-being of people with ALS, their loved ones, and their caregivers. As MAiD is framed by specific eligibility criteria, broadening its eligibility is often proposed to address these issues. This critical review of the literature aims to identify moral issues relating to ALS that may persist or arise in the event of such widening. The MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched using 4 search combinations to capture insights from existing literature on ethics, MAiD and ALS (N=41). A thematic content analysis highlighted 3 contextual categories where moral issues emerge (the experience of the disease, the choice of how to die, and the implementation of MAiD). Two important observations are discussed: 1) there are differences in perspective between stakeholders, which can lead to disagreement, but some similarities of perspective also exist; 2) the widening of MAiD eligibility mainly concerns moral issues related to the choice of how to die, and thus constitutes a partial solution to the problems identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.333.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that leads some people with the disease to consider medical assistance in dying (MAiD). In this article, we describe how a variety of moral problems can emerge from this particular context and affect the well-being of people with ALS, their loved ones, and their caregivers. As MAiD is framed by specific eligibility criteria, broadening its eligibility is often proposed to address these issues. This critical review of the literature aims to identify moral issues relating to ALS that may persist or arise in the event of such widening. The MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched using 4 search combinations to capture insights from existing literature on ethics, MAiD and ALS (N=41). A thematic content analysis highlighted 3 contextual categories where moral issues emerge (the experience of the disease, the choice of how to die, and the implementation of MAiD). Two important observations are discussed: 1) there are differences in perspective between stakeholders, which can lead to disagreement, but some similarities of perspective also exist; 2) the widening of MAiD eligibility mainly concerns moral issues related to the choice of how to die, and thus constitutes a partial solution to the problems identified.

第7章)。肌萎缩性侧索硬化症背景下死亡的医疗援助问题:文献综述。
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种无法治愈的神经退行性疾病,导致一些患者在死亡时考虑医疗援助(MAiD)。在这篇文章中,我们描述了各种各样的道德问题是如何在这种特殊的背景下出现的,并影响到ALS患者、他们的亲人和他们的照顾者的福祉。由于MAiD有具体的资格标准,因此经常建议扩大其资格以解决这些问题。这篇对文献的批判性回顾旨在确定与ALS相关的道德问题,这些问题可能在这种扩大的情况下持续存在或出现。使用4种检索组合对MEDLINE、EMBASE CINAHL和Web of Science数据库进行检索,以获取有关伦理学、MAiD和ALS的现有文献的见解(N=41)。专题内容分析突出了出现道德问题的3个背景类别(疾病经历、死亡方式的选择和MAiD的实施)。讨论了两个重要的观察结果:1)利益相关者之间的观点存在差异,这可能导致分歧,但也存在一些观点的相似性;2) MAiD资格的扩大主要涉及与死亡方式选择相关的道德问题,因此构成了对所确定问题的部分解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信