{"title":"Chapitre 7. Les enjeux de l’aide médicale à mourir en contexte de sclérose latérale amyotrophique : une revue de la littérature.","authors":"Caroline Favron-Godbout, Eric Racine","doi":"10.3917/jibes.333.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that leads some people with the disease to consider medical assistance in dying (MAiD). In this article, we describe how a variety of moral problems can emerge from this particular context and affect the well-being of people with ALS, their loved ones, and their caregivers. As MAiD is framed by specific eligibility criteria, broadening its eligibility is often proposed to address these issues. This critical review of the literature aims to identify moral issues relating to ALS that may persist or arise in the event of such widening. The MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched using 4 search combinations to capture insights from existing literature on ethics, MAiD and ALS (N=41). A thematic content analysis highlighted 3 contextual categories where moral issues emerge (the experience of the disease, the choice of how to die, and the implementation of MAiD). Two important observations are discussed: 1) there are differences in perspective between stakeholders, which can lead to disagreement, but some similarities of perspective also exist; 2) the widening of MAiD eligibility mainly concerns moral issues related to the choice of how to die, and thus constitutes a partial solution to the problems identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":73577,"journal":{"name":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","volume":"33 3","pages":"95-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.333.0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an incurable neurodegenerative disease that leads some people with the disease to consider medical assistance in dying (MAiD). In this article, we describe how a variety of moral problems can emerge from this particular context and affect the well-being of people with ALS, their loved ones, and their caregivers. As MAiD is framed by specific eligibility criteria, broadening its eligibility is often proposed to address these issues. This critical review of the literature aims to identify moral issues relating to ALS that may persist or arise in the event of such widening. The MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched using 4 search combinations to capture insights from existing literature on ethics, MAiD and ALS (N=41). A thematic content analysis highlighted 3 contextual categories where moral issues emerge (the experience of the disease, the choice of how to die, and the implementation of MAiD). Two important observations are discussed: 1) there are differences in perspective between stakeholders, which can lead to disagreement, but some similarities of perspective also exist; 2) the widening of MAiD eligibility mainly concerns moral issues related to the choice of how to die, and thus constitutes a partial solution to the problems identified.
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种无法治愈的神经退行性疾病,导致一些患者在死亡时考虑医疗援助(MAiD)。在这篇文章中,我们描述了各种各样的道德问题是如何在这种特殊的背景下出现的,并影响到ALS患者、他们的亲人和他们的照顾者的福祉。由于MAiD有具体的资格标准,因此经常建议扩大其资格以解决这些问题。这篇对文献的批判性回顾旨在确定与ALS相关的道德问题,这些问题可能在这种扩大的情况下持续存在或出现。使用4种检索组合对MEDLINE、EMBASE CINAHL和Web of Science数据库进行检索,以获取有关伦理学、MAiD和ALS的现有文献的见解(N=41)。专题内容分析突出了出现道德问题的3个背景类别(疾病经历、死亡方式的选择和MAiD的实施)。讨论了两个重要的观察结果:1)利益相关者之间的观点存在差异,这可能导致分歧,但也存在一些观点的相似性;2) MAiD资格的扩大主要涉及与死亡方式选择相关的道德问题,因此构成了对所确定问题的部分解决方案。