Pilot Study of the Effects of Paced Breathing on Measures of Convergent and Divergent Thinking.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
McKenzie B Wallace, Amy N Costa, Bradley J Ferguson, Megan A Carey, Chloe Rzeppa, Briana M Kille, David R Drysdale, Briann E Sutton, Brianne H Shuler, Ryan P Johnson, Elizabeth P Kwenda, Jamie Hadley, Whitney Snyders, David Q Beversdorf
{"title":"Pilot Study of the Effects of Paced Breathing on Measures of Convergent and Divergent Thinking.","authors":"McKenzie B Wallace,&nbsp;Amy N Costa,&nbsp;Bradley J Ferguson,&nbsp;Megan A Carey,&nbsp;Chloe Rzeppa,&nbsp;Briana M Kille,&nbsp;David R Drysdale,&nbsp;Briann E Sutton,&nbsp;Brianne H Shuler,&nbsp;Ryan P Johnson,&nbsp;Elizabeth P Kwenda,&nbsp;Jamie Hadley,&nbsp;Whitney Snyders,&nbsp;David Q Beversdorf","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ability of the autonomic nervous system's stress response to impair aspects of cognitive flexibility is known. However, the ability to modulate the sympathetic response and improve these cognitive impairments via nonpharmacological intervention, such as paced breathing (PB), requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better elucidate the effects of PB on cognition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We employed a PB protocol in a total of 52 healthy men and women and measured performance on convergent and divergent cognitive tasks, perceived stress, and physiological measures (eg, blood pressure, heart rate). Participants attended two experimental sessions consisting of either PB or normal breathing followed by cognitive assessments including convergent (compound remote associate, anagram) and divergent (alternate use, fluency) tasks. Experiment 2 consisted of more difficult versions of cognitive tasks compared with Experiment 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Experiment 1, PB significantly reduced the female participants' systolic and diastolic blood pressure immediately after the breathing protocol without affecting their cognition. In Experiment 2, PB significantly reduced perceived stress immediately after the breathing protocol, regardless of sex. There was no effect on cognition in Experiment 2, but a correlation was observed between perceived stress change and anagram number solved change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While PB modulates sympathetic activity in females, there was a lack of improvement in cognitive flexibility performance. At least for a single trial of PB, cognitive flexibility did not improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":"36 1","pages":"28-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ability of the autonomic nervous system's stress response to impair aspects of cognitive flexibility is known. However, the ability to modulate the sympathetic response and improve these cognitive impairments via nonpharmacological intervention, such as paced breathing (PB), requires further investigation.

Objective: To better elucidate the effects of PB on cognition.

Method: We employed a PB protocol in a total of 52 healthy men and women and measured performance on convergent and divergent cognitive tasks, perceived stress, and physiological measures (eg, blood pressure, heart rate). Participants attended two experimental sessions consisting of either PB or normal breathing followed by cognitive assessments including convergent (compound remote associate, anagram) and divergent (alternate use, fluency) tasks. Experiment 2 consisted of more difficult versions of cognitive tasks compared with Experiment 1.

Results: In Experiment 1, PB significantly reduced the female participants' systolic and diastolic blood pressure immediately after the breathing protocol without affecting their cognition. In Experiment 2, PB significantly reduced perceived stress immediately after the breathing protocol, regardless of sex. There was no effect on cognition in Experiment 2, but a correlation was observed between perceived stress change and anagram number solved change.

Conclusion: While PB modulates sympathetic activity in females, there was a lack of improvement in cognitive flexibility performance. At least for a single trial of PB, cognitive flexibility did not improve.

有节奏的呼吸对聚合和发散思维的影响的初步研究。
背景:自主神经系统的应激反应损害认知灵活性的能力是已知的。然而,通过非药物干预(如起搏呼吸(PB))调节交感神经反应和改善这些认知障碍的能力需要进一步研究。目的:更好地阐明PB对认知功能的影响。方法:我们对52名健康男性和女性采用了PB方案,并测量了他们在趋同和发散认知任务、感知压力和生理指标(如血压、心率)方面的表现。参与者参加了两次实验,包括PB或正常呼吸,然后进行认知评估,包括收敛(复合远程联想、变位词)和发散(交替使用、流利性)任务。与实验1相比,实验2由更难的认知任务组成。结果:在实验1中,PB在不影响女性认知的情况下,显著降低了女性参与者在呼吸方案后的收缩压和舒张压。在实验2中,PB显著降低了呼吸方案后立即感知到的压力,无论性别如何。实验2对认知没有影响,但观察到感知压力变化和变位数字解决变化之间存在相关性。结论:虽然PB调节女性的交感神经活动,但认知灵活性表现缺乏改善。至少在PB的单一试验中,认知灵活性没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement. The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信