Association between baseline dissociation levels and stress-induced state dissociation in patients with posttraumatic-stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and major depressive disorder.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Livia Graumann, Johannes Bodo Heekerens, Moritz Duesenberg, Sophie Metz, Carsten Spitzer, Christian Otte, Stefan Roepke, Katja Wingenfeld
{"title":"Association between baseline dissociation levels and stress-induced state dissociation in patients with posttraumatic-stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, and major depressive disorder.","authors":"Livia Graumann, Johannes Bodo Heekerens, Moritz Duesenberg, Sophie Metz, Carsten Spitzer, Christian Otte, Stefan Roepke, Katja Wingenfeld","doi":"10.1186/s40479-023-00215-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dissociative symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with trauma-related disorders such as borderline personality disorder (BPD) and posttraumatic-stress disorder (PTSD), and also occur in patients with depressive disorders. Acute dissociative states are theorized to be stress-related, and some individuals experience recurring patterns of dissociation. The relationship between the intensity of dissociative episodes (trait-like dissociation) and acute dissociative states, however, is incompletely understood. In the present study, we investigated how levels of baseline (trait-like) dissociation relate to changes in dissociative states during a laboratory stress induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our female sample comprised 65 patients with BPD and/or PTSD, 84 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 44 non-clinical controls (NCC). Baseline dissociation was assessed at the start of the study using the Dissociation Tension Scale past week version (DSS-7). All participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and a placebo version (P-TSST). Before and after the TSST or P-TSST, state dissociation was assessed using the Dissociation Tension Scale acute (DSS-4). We used structural equation models to estimate changes in state dissociation items (somatoform dissociation, derealization, depersonalization, analgesia), and to test whether these changes relate to levels of baseline dissociation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significant increases in all state dissociation items in response to the TSST in patients with BPD and/or PTSD and patients with MDD, but not in NCCs. Increases in somatoform dissociation and derealization during the TSST were significantly related to higher levels of baseline dissociation in patients with BPD and/or PTSD, but not in patients with MDD or NCCs. Results indicate no significant changes in state dissociation during the P-TSST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results replicate earlier findings that patients with BPD and/or PTSD report higher levels of stress-related state dissociation than NCC and extend them to patients with MDD. In addition, our findings indicate that baseline levels of dissociation relate to stress-induced changes in state dissociation among patients with BPD and PTSD, but not patients with MDD. In clinical applications, measures of baseline dissociation could be used to facilitate the prediction and treatment of stress-related dissociative states in patients with BPD and/or PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48586,"journal":{"name":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-023-00215-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dissociative symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with trauma-related disorders such as borderline personality disorder (BPD) and posttraumatic-stress disorder (PTSD), and also occur in patients with depressive disorders. Acute dissociative states are theorized to be stress-related, and some individuals experience recurring patterns of dissociation. The relationship between the intensity of dissociative episodes (trait-like dissociation) and acute dissociative states, however, is incompletely understood. In the present study, we investigated how levels of baseline (trait-like) dissociation relate to changes in dissociative states during a laboratory stress induction.

Methods: Our female sample comprised 65 patients with BPD and/or PTSD, 84 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 44 non-clinical controls (NCC). Baseline dissociation was assessed at the start of the study using the Dissociation Tension Scale past week version (DSS-7). All participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and a placebo version (P-TSST). Before and after the TSST or P-TSST, state dissociation was assessed using the Dissociation Tension Scale acute (DSS-4). We used structural equation models to estimate changes in state dissociation items (somatoform dissociation, derealization, depersonalization, analgesia), and to test whether these changes relate to levels of baseline dissociation.

Results: We found significant increases in all state dissociation items in response to the TSST in patients with BPD and/or PTSD and patients with MDD, but not in NCCs. Increases in somatoform dissociation and derealization during the TSST were significantly related to higher levels of baseline dissociation in patients with BPD and/or PTSD, but not in patients with MDD or NCCs. Results indicate no significant changes in state dissociation during the P-TSST.

Conclusion: Our results replicate earlier findings that patients with BPD and/or PTSD report higher levels of stress-related state dissociation than NCC and extend them to patients with MDD. In addition, our findings indicate that baseline levels of dissociation relate to stress-induced changes in state dissociation among patients with BPD and PTSD, but not patients with MDD. In clinical applications, measures of baseline dissociation could be used to facilitate the prediction and treatment of stress-related dissociative states in patients with BPD and/or PTSD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

创伤后应激障碍、边缘型人格障碍和重度抑郁障碍患者的基线解离水平与应激诱发状态解离之间的关系。
导言:解离症状在边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等创伤相关障碍患者中非常普遍,在抑郁症患者中也会出现。急性解离状态被认为与压力有关,有些人会反复出现解离模式。然而,解离发作的强度(特质样解离)与急性解离状态之间的关系尚不完全清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了基线(特质样)解离水平与实验室应激诱导过程中解离状态变化之间的关系:我们的女性样本包括 65 名 BPD 和/或创伤后应激障碍患者、84 名重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者和 44 名非临床对照组(NCC)。在研究开始时,使用解离紧张度量表过去一周版(DSS-7)对基线解离进行评估。所有参与者都接受了特里尔社交压力测试(TSST)和安慰剂测试(P-TSST)。在进行特里尔社交压力测试或 P-TSST 之前和之后,我们使用急性解离紧张度量表(DSS-4)对解离状态进行了评估。我们使用结构方程模型来估算状态解离项目(躯体形式解离、去个性化、去人格化、镇痛)的变化,并检验这些变化是否与基线解离水平有关:我们发现,BPD 和/或创伤后应激障碍患者以及 MDD 患者对 TSST 的反应中,所有状态解离项目都有明显增加,而 NCCs 患者则没有。在 TSST 中,躯体形式解离和去理想化的增加与 BPD 和/或创伤后应激障碍患者较高的基线解离水平有显著关系,但与 MDD 或 NCC 患者无关。结果表明,P-TSST期间的状态解离没有明显变化:我们的研究结果重复了之前的研究结果,即 BPD 和/或创伤后应激障碍患者报告的应激相关状态解离水平高于 NCC 患者,并扩展到 MDD 患者。此外,我们的研究结果表明,在 BPD 和创伤后应激障碍患者中,解离的基线水平与应激引起的状态解离变化有关,但与 MDD 患者无关。在临床应用中,基线解离度的测量可用于促进对BPD和/或创伤后应激障碍患者与应激相关的解离状态的预测和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation provides a platform for researchers and clinicians interested in borderline personality disorder (BPD) as a currently highly challenging psychiatric disorder. Emotion dysregulation is at the core of BPD but also stands on its own as a major pathological component of the underlying neurobiology of various other psychiatric disorders. The journal focuses on the psychological, social and neurobiological aspects of emotion dysregulation as well as epidemiology, phenomenology, pathophysiology, treatment, neurobiology, genetics, and animal models of BPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信