The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: a comparison study between EOS and MRI in the paediatric population.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s00256-023-04385-6
Geoffrey T Murphy, Ravi Rudraraju, Timothy Mathews, Verinder Sidhu, Alyssa Miller, Kylie Brown, Alex Nicholls
{"title":"The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance: a comparison study between EOS and MRI in the paediatric population.","authors":"Geoffrey T Murphy, Ravi Rudraraju, Timothy Mathews, Verinder Sidhu, Alyssa Miller, Kylie Brown, Alex Nicholls","doi":"10.1007/s00256-023-04385-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the relative reliability and accuracy of TT-TG measurements in EOS with that of MRI in a paediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were included if they underwent both an MRI and EOS scans and were under the age of 16. Two authors recorded the TT-TG distances on each modality at two separate time points. In the EOS images, the distance between the two points was measured in the horizontal 2D plane. In the MRI images, it was done in the plane referenced by posterior femoral condylar axis. The intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed in each modality and between modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients (30 knees), 14 males, and 13 females with an average age of 13 years (range: 7-16 years) were included in the study. The mean TT-TG distance on EOS scan and MRI scan was 14 mm. On inter- and intra-observer analysis, both imaging modalities had excellent reliability (0.97 ICC for EOS and 0.98 ICC for MRI inter-observer) and repeatability (0.98-0.99 ICC for EOS and 0.99 ICC for MRI for intra-observer). However, on comparing the two imaging modalities (EOS vs MRI), the ICC was fair (0.56 ICC for rater 1 and 0.65 ICC for rater 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the EOS TT-TG measurements were precise and reproducible, they were only moderately comparable to MRI TT-TG measurements. Consequently, EOS TT-TG measurements should not be used for decision-making without the development of EOS-specific TT-TG values that indicate the need for distal realignment surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04385-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the relative reliability and accuracy of TT-TG measurements in EOS with that of MRI in a paediatric population.

Methods: Patients were included if they underwent both an MRI and EOS scans and were under the age of 16. Two authors recorded the TT-TG distances on each modality at two separate time points. In the EOS images, the distance between the two points was measured in the horizontal 2D plane. In the MRI images, it was done in the plane referenced by posterior femoral condylar axis. The intra- and inter-rater reliability was assessed in each modality and between modalities.

Results: Twenty-seven patients (30 knees), 14 males, and 13 females with an average age of 13 years (range: 7-16 years) were included in the study. The mean TT-TG distance on EOS scan and MRI scan was 14 mm. On inter- and intra-observer analysis, both imaging modalities had excellent reliability (0.97 ICC for EOS and 0.98 ICC for MRI inter-observer) and repeatability (0.98-0.99 ICC for EOS and 0.99 ICC for MRI for intra-observer). However, on comparing the two imaging modalities (EOS vs MRI), the ICC was fair (0.56 ICC for rater 1 and 0.65 ICC for rater 2).

Conclusion: While the EOS TT-TG measurements were precise and reproducible, they were only moderately comparable to MRI TT-TG measurements. Consequently, EOS TT-TG measurements should not be used for decision-making without the development of EOS-specific TT-TG values that indicate the need for distal realignment surgery.

Level of evidence: Level II.

胫骨结节-滑车沟距离:EOS和MRI在儿科人群中的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较EOS中TT-TG测量与MRI在儿科人群中的相对可靠性和准确性。方法:年龄在16岁以下的患者均接受了MRI和EOS扫描。两位作者在两个不同的时间点记录了每个模态的TT-TG距离。在EOS图像中,在水平二维平面上测量两点之间的距离。在MRI图像中,以股骨后髁轴为参考平面进行。评估了每个模式和模式之间的内部和内部可靠性。结果:纳入患者27例(30膝),男性14例,女性13例,平均年龄13岁(范围7-16岁)。EOS扫描和MRI扫描的TT-TG平均距离为14 mm。在观察者之间和观察者内部分析中,两种成像方式都具有出色的可靠性(EOS为0.97 ICC, MRI为0.98 ICC)和可重复性(EOS为0.98-0.99 ICC, MRI为0.99 ICC)。然而,在比较两种成像方式(EOS与MRI)时,ICC是公平的(等级1为0.56 ICC,等级2为0.65 ICC)。结论:虽然EOS TT-TG测量是精确的和可重复的,但它们与MRI TT-TG测量只有适度的可比性。因此,在没有确定EOS特异性TT-TG值(表明需要进行远端复位手术)的情况下,EOS TT-TG测量不应用于决策。证据等级:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信