Neonatologists' Perspectives on Exploring Parental Spirituality in Prenatal Consultations.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dana L Peralta, Dominic Moore, Ryann Bierer
{"title":"Neonatologists' Perspectives on Exploring Parental Spirituality in Prenatal Consultations.","authors":"Dana L Peralta,&nbsp;Dominic Moore,&nbsp;Ryann Bierer","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2022.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Values of religion, spirituality, and faith (RSF) are central to decision making for many parents facing extremely preterm labor or prenatal diagnoses of potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies. Neonatologists' opinions and comfort with discussing parental RSF are not well known. We sought to understand neonatologists' current practices and perceptions of exploring parental RSF in prenatal consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed at a single U.S. academic institution to evaluate the inclusion of spiritual terminology in documentation. All mothers who were admitted with anticipated extremely preterm delivery as well as those with prenatal diagnoses of potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies were included in analysis. After chart review, an anonymous survey was distributed to neonatology attendings and fellows to examine perspectives on exploring parental RSF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The chart review indicated that RSF terminology was absent from the documentation of all prenatal consultations performed by neonatology. Sixty-five percent of survey respondents considered RSF important in their personal lives and 47% considered RSF important in clinical practice. The three most significant barriers to exploring RSF were lack of training or education in spiritual care, differences between physicians' and patients' personal beliefs, and insufficient time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights a gap between the goal for prenatal counseling in cases of extreme prematurity and potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies and current practices that frequently exclude the values most important to many parents. Lack of training in spiritual care is a significant barrier to neonatologists exploring parental RSF.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Values of religion, spirituality, and faith (RSF) are central to decision making for many parents facing extremely preterm labor or prenatal diagnoses of potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies. Neonatologists' opinions and comfort with discussing parental RSF are not well known. We sought to understand neonatologists' current practices and perceptions of exploring parental RSF in prenatal consultations.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a single U.S. academic institution to evaluate the inclusion of spiritual terminology in documentation. All mothers who were admitted with anticipated extremely preterm delivery as well as those with prenatal diagnoses of potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies were included in analysis. After chart review, an anonymous survey was distributed to neonatology attendings and fellows to examine perspectives on exploring parental RSF.

Results: The chart review indicated that RSF terminology was absent from the documentation of all prenatal consultations performed by neonatology. Sixty-five percent of survey respondents considered RSF important in their personal lives and 47% considered RSF important in clinical practice. The three most significant barriers to exploring RSF were lack of training or education in spiritual care, differences between physicians' and patients' personal beliefs, and insufficient time.

Conclusions: Our study highlights a gap between the goal for prenatal counseling in cases of extreme prematurity and potentially life-limiting congenital anomalies and current practices that frequently exclude the values most important to many parents. Lack of training in spiritual care is a significant barrier to neonatologists exploring parental RSF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新生儿学家在产前咨询中探索父母灵性的观点。
背景和目的:对于许多面临极度早产或产前诊断可能限制生命的先天性异常的父母来说,宗教、精神和信仰的价值观(RSF)是决策的核心。新生儿学家的意见和对讨论父母的无国界医生的安慰并不为人所知。我们试图了解新生儿学家在产前咨询中探索父母RSF的当前做法和看法。方法:在一个美国学术机构进行回顾性图表回顾,以评估文献中包含的精神术语。所有因预期极度早产入院的母亲,以及产前诊断为可能限制生命的先天性异常的母亲都被纳入分析。在图表审查后,一份匿名调查被分发给新生儿主治医师和研究员,以研究探索父母RSF的观点。结果:图表回顾表明,RSF术语在所有新生儿产前咨询的文件中缺失。65%的受访者认为RSF在他们的个人生活中很重要,47%的受访者认为RSF在临床实践中很重要。探索RSF的三个最重要的障碍是缺乏精神护理方面的培训或教育,医生和患者个人信仰的差异,以及时间不足。结论:我们的研究突出了在极端早产和可能限制生命的先天性异常的情况下,产前咨询的目标与目前的做法之间的差距,这些做法经常排除了对许多父母最重要的价值。缺乏精神护理方面的培训是新生儿医生探索父母RSF的一个重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信