Modelling CD4 reagent usage across a national hierarchal network of laboratories in South Africa.

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Naseem Cassim, Lindi-Marie Coetzee, Deborah K Glencross
{"title":"Modelling CD4 reagent usage across a national hierarchal network of laboratories in South Africa.","authors":"Naseem Cassim,&nbsp;Lindi-Marie Coetzee,&nbsp;Deborah K Glencross","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Laboratory Service is mandated to deliver cost-effective and efficient diagnostic services across South Africa. Their mandate is achieved by a network of laboratories ranging from centralised national laboratories to distant rural facilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a model of CD4 reagent utilisation as an independent measure of laboratory efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The efficiency percentage was defined as finished goods (number of reportable results) over raw materials (number of reagents supplied) for 47 laboratories in nine provinces (both anonymised) for 2019. The efficiency percentage at national and provincial levels was calculated and compared to the optimal efficiency percentage derived using pre-set assumptions. Comparative laboratory analysis was conducted for the provinces with the best and worst efficiency percentages. The possible linear relationship between the efficiency percentage and call-outs, days lost, referrals, and turn-around time was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data are reported for 2 806 799 CD4 tests, with an overall efficiency percentage of 84.5% (optimal of 84.98%). The efficiency percentage varied between 75.7% and 87.7% between provinces, while within the laboratory it ranged from 66.1% to 111.5%. Four laboratories reported an efficiency percentage ranging from 67.8% to 85.7%. No linear correlation was noted between the efficiency percentage, call-outs, days lost, and turn-around time performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reagent efficiency percentage distinguished laboratories into different utilisation levels irrespective of their CD4 service level. This parameter is an additional independent indicator of laboratory performance, with no relationship with any contributing factors tested, that can be implemented across pathology disciplines for monitoring reagent utilisation.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study provides an objective methodology to assess reagent utilisation as an independent measure of laboratory efficiency. This model could be applied to all routine pathology services.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Health Laboratory Service is mandated to deliver cost-effective and efficient diagnostic services across South Africa. Their mandate is achieved by a network of laboratories ranging from centralised national laboratories to distant rural facilities.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a model of CD4 reagent utilisation as an independent measure of laboratory efficiency.

Methods: The efficiency percentage was defined as finished goods (number of reportable results) over raw materials (number of reagents supplied) for 47 laboratories in nine provinces (both anonymised) for 2019. The efficiency percentage at national and provincial levels was calculated and compared to the optimal efficiency percentage derived using pre-set assumptions. Comparative laboratory analysis was conducted for the provinces with the best and worst efficiency percentages. The possible linear relationship between the efficiency percentage and call-outs, days lost, referrals, and turn-around time was assessed.

Results: Data are reported for 2 806 799 CD4 tests, with an overall efficiency percentage of 84.5% (optimal of 84.98%). The efficiency percentage varied between 75.7% and 87.7% between provinces, while within the laboratory it ranged from 66.1% to 111.5%. Four laboratories reported an efficiency percentage ranging from 67.8% to 85.7%. No linear correlation was noted between the efficiency percentage, call-outs, days lost, and turn-around time performance.

Conclusion: Reagent efficiency percentage distinguished laboratories into different utilisation levels irrespective of their CD4 service level. This parameter is an additional independent indicator of laboratory performance, with no relationship with any contributing factors tested, that can be implemented across pathology disciplines for monitoring reagent utilisation.

What this study adds: This study provides an objective methodology to assess reagent utilisation as an independent measure of laboratory efficiency. This model could be applied to all routine pathology services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

模拟CD4试剂在南非实验室的国家层次网络的使用。
背景:国家卫生实验室服务局的任务是在南非各地提供具有成本效益和效率的诊断服务。他们的任务是通过从中央国家实验室到偏远农村设施的实验室网络来完成的。目的:本研究旨在建立CD4试剂利用模型,作为实验室效率的独立衡量标准。方法:以2019年9个省(均为匿名)47个实验室的成品(报告结果数量)超过原材料(提供试剂数量)为效率百分比。计算了国家和省一级的效率百分比,并与使用预设假设得出的最佳效率百分比进行了比较。对效率最佳和最差的省份进行了实验室对比分析。评估了效率百分比与呼出、损失天数、转诊和周转时间之间可能存在的线性关系。结果:报告2 806 799例CD4检测数据,总有效率为84.5%(最优为84.98%)。各省之间的效率在75.7% ~ 87.7%之间,实验室内部的效率在66.1% ~ 111.5%之间。四个实验室报告的效率百分比从67.8%到85.7%不等。效率百分比、呼出量、损失天数和周转时间绩效之间没有线性相关性。结论:试剂效率百分比区分了不同CD4服务水平实验室的不同利用水平。该参数是实验室性能的额外独立指标,与测试的任何促成因素无关,可在病理学科中实施,用于监测试剂的使用情况。本研究补充的内容:本研究提供了一种客观的方法来评估试剂利用率,作为实验室效率的独立衡量标准。该模型可应用于所有常规病理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信