Safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRS): Experience of one hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020

Sergio I Prada , Álvaro Vivas , Maria Paula Garcia-Garcia , Erik Rosero , Marly Orrego , Juan Sebastián Candelo , John España , Germán Soto , Diego Martínez , Leonardo García
{"title":"Safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRS): Experience of one hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020","authors":"Sergio I Prada ,&nbsp;Álvaro Vivas ,&nbsp;Maria Paula Garcia-Garcia ,&nbsp;Erik Rosero ,&nbsp;Marly Orrego ,&nbsp;Juan Sebastián Candelo ,&nbsp;John España ,&nbsp;Germán Soto ,&nbsp;Diego Martínez ,&nbsp;Leonardo García","doi":"10.1016/j.ipemt.2022.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The high transmissibility rate of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 facilitated an exponential growth in the number of infections, posing a tremendous threat to healthcare systems across the world. The use of Non-oil 95% efficiency (N95) respirators demonstrated to reduce the risk of virus transmission. The escalated demand in N95 respirators during 2020 generated a massive shortage worldwide which resulted in serious implications, one being an increase in healthcare providers’ costs. In response, various optimization strategies were implemented. This study aimed to assess the implementation of a safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) in a high-complexity university hospital in 2020. Associated costs were estimated through a descriptive accounting analysis of resources saved. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility rates were 80.5%, 78.8%, and 83.6%, respectively. With an implementation cost of approximately 10,000 USD, there was a 56.1% reduction in FFRs consumption, compared with a non-policy scenario, with savings exceeding 500,000 USD in 2020. In a pandemic scenario where it is vital to spare resources, a FFRs rational use policy demonstrated to be a highly cost-efficient alternative in order to save resources without increasing contagion risk among healthcare workers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73507,"journal":{"name":"IPEM-translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769100/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPEM-translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667258822000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The high transmissibility rate of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 facilitated an exponential growth in the number of infections, posing a tremendous threat to healthcare systems across the world. The use of Non-oil 95% efficiency (N95) respirators demonstrated to reduce the risk of virus transmission. The escalated demand in N95 respirators during 2020 generated a massive shortage worldwide which resulted in serious implications, one being an increase in healthcare providers’ costs. In response, various optimization strategies were implemented. This study aimed to assess the implementation of a safe and effective re-use policy for high-efficiency filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) in a high-complexity university hospital in 2020. Associated costs were estimated through a descriptive accounting analysis of resources saved. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility rates were 80.5%, 78.8%, and 83.6%, respectively. With an implementation cost of approximately 10,000 USD, there was a 56.1% reduction in FFRs consumption, compared with a non-policy scenario, with savings exceeding 500,000 USD in 2020. In a pandemic scenario where it is vital to spare resources, a FFRs rational use policy demonstrated to be a highly cost-efficient alternative in order to save resources without increasing contagion risk among healthcare workers.

Abstract Image

高效过滤式呼吸器安全有效的重复使用政策:一家医院在2020年Covid-19大流行期间的经验
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型的高传播率促使感染人数呈指数级增长,对世界各地的卫生保健系统构成巨大威胁。使用无油95%效率(N95)口罩可降低病毒传播风险。2020年对N95口罩的需求不断升级,在全球范围内造成了严重的短缺,造成了严重的影响,其中之一是医疗保健提供者的成本增加。为此,实施了多种优化策略。本研究旨在评估2020年高效过滤式口罩在某高复杂性大学医院安全有效的重复使用政策的实施情况。通过对节省的资源进行描述性会计分析来估计相关费用。可接受性、适宜性和可行性分别为80.5%、78.8%和83.6%。实施成本约为1万美元,与非政策情景相比,ffr消耗减少了56.1%,到2020年将节省超过50万美元。在大流行的情况下,节省资源是至关重要的,在不增加卫生保健工作者传染风险的情况下,ffr的合理使用政策被证明是一种极具成本效益的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IPEM-translation
IPEM-translation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
63 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信