Usability of a digital health platform to support home hospitalization in heart failure patients: a multicentre feasibility study among healthcare professionals.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jobbe P L Leenen, Martijn Scherrenberg, Wendy Bruins, Josiane Boyne, Julie Vranken, Hans-Peter Brunner la Rocca, Paul Dendale, Astrid E van der Velde
{"title":"Usability of a digital health platform to support home hospitalization in heart failure patients: a multicentre feasibility study among healthcare professionals.","authors":"Jobbe P L Leenen, Martijn Scherrenberg, Wendy Bruins, Josiane Boyne, Julie Vranken, Hans-Peter Brunner la Rocca, Paul Dendale, Astrid E van der Velde","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvad059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of mortality and (re)hospitalizations. The NWE-Chance project explored the feasibility of providing hospitalizations at home (HH) supported by a newly developed digital health platform. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived usability by healthcare professionals (HCPs) of a digital platform in addition to HH for HF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm interventional study was conducted. Sixty-three patients and 22 HCPs participated. The HH consisted of daily home visits by the nurse and use of the platform, consisting of a portable blood pressure device, weight scale, pulse oximeter, a wearable chest patch to measure vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, activity level, and posture), and an eCoach for the patient. Primary outcome was usability of the platform measured by the System Usability Scale halfway and at the end of the study. Overall usability was rated as sufficient (mean score 72.1 ± 8.9) and did not differ between the measurements moments (P = 0.690). The HCPs reported positive experiences (n = 7), negative experiences (n = 13), and recommendations (n = 6) for the future. Actual use of the platform was 79% of the HH days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A digital health platform to support HH was considered usable by HCPs, although actual use of the platform was limited. Therefore, several improvements in the integration of the digital platform into clinical workflows and in defining the precise role of the digital platform and its use are needed to add value before full implementation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov NCT04084964.</p>","PeriodicalId":50493,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of mortality and (re)hospitalizations. The NWE-Chance project explored the feasibility of providing hospitalizations at home (HH) supported by a newly developed digital health platform. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived usability by healthcare professionals (HCPs) of a digital platform in addition to HH for HF patients.

Methods and results: A prospective, international, multicentre, single-arm interventional study was conducted. Sixty-three patients and 22 HCPs participated. The HH consisted of daily home visits by the nurse and use of the platform, consisting of a portable blood pressure device, weight scale, pulse oximeter, a wearable chest patch to measure vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, activity level, and posture), and an eCoach for the patient. Primary outcome was usability of the platform measured by the System Usability Scale halfway and at the end of the study. Overall usability was rated as sufficient (mean score 72.1 ± 8.9) and did not differ between the measurements moments (P = 0.690). The HCPs reported positive experiences (n = 7), negative experiences (n = 13), and recommendations (n = 6) for the future. Actual use of the platform was 79% of the HH days.

Conclusion: A digital health platform to support HH was considered usable by HCPs, although actual use of the platform was limited. Therefore, several improvements in the integration of the digital platform into clinical workflows and in defining the precise role of the digital platform and its use are needed to add value before full implementation.

Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04084964.

支持心力衰竭患者居家住院的数字医疗平台的可用性:一项针对医护人员的多中心可行性研究。
目的:心力衰竭(HF)是导致死亡和(再次)住院的常见原因。NWE-Chance 项目探讨了在新开发的数字健康平台支持下提供在家住院治疗(HH)的可行性。本研究旨在探讨医护专业人员(HCPs)对高血压患者在家住院以外的数字平台的可用性感知:进行了一项前瞻性、国际性、多中心、单臂干预研究。63名患者和22名医护人员参与了研究。HH 包括护士的每日家访和平台的使用,平台由便携式血压仪、体重秤、脉搏血氧仪、测量生命体征(心率、呼吸频率、活动水平和姿势)的可穿戴胸贴和患者电子教练组成。主要结果是研究中途和结束时通过系统可用性量表测量平台的可用性。总体可用性被评为足够(平均分 72.1 ± 8.9),不同测量时间之间没有差异(P = 0.690)。高级保健人员报告了正面体验(7 人)、负面体验(13 人)和对未来的建议(6 人)。该平台的实际使用率占保健日的 79%:结论:尽管实际使用率有限,但保健医生认为支持保健的数字保健平台是可用的。因此,在将数字平台整合到临床工作流程中以及确定数字平台的确切作用及其使用方面需要进行一些改进,以便在全面实施之前增加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-NURSING
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed journal of the European Society of Cardiology’s Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP) covering the broad field of cardiovascular nursing including chronic and acute care, cardiac rehabilitation, primary and secondary prevention, heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, interventional cardiology, cardiac care, and vascular nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信