The impact of dementia on rehabilitation outcomes following hip fracture

IF 2.2 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Aging Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.1002/agm2.12251
Yee Leng Loh, John Wicks, Tara Alexander
{"title":"The impact of dementia on rehabilitation outcomes following hip fracture","authors":"Yee Leng Loh,&nbsp;John Wicks,&nbsp;Tara Alexander","doi":"10.1002/agm2.12251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare clinical outcomes between patients for whom their participation in inpatient rehabilitation was and was not impacted by dementia through matching patients reporting dementia (dementia group) with those not reporting dementia (non-dementia group).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospectively collected data held by the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcome Centre (AROC) were analyzed for patients aged 65 years or older receiving inpatient rehabilitation in public hospitals in Australia following a hip fracture and discharged between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2019. Patients reported as having dementia impacting their rehabilitation program were matched to patients not reporting dementia based on age, admission motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, and accommodation prior to rehabilitation. The matched cohorts were compared in relation to clinical outcomes (motor and cognitive FIM improvement, FIM efficiency, length of stay, and discharge destination) following participation in hospital-based rehabilitation using univariate analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with dementia had significantly lower cognitive FIM scores on commencing rehabilitation (17.6 and 26.9, respectively, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and their median length of stay was 2 days shorter than those without dementia (21 and 23 days, respectively, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Relative change in FIM score and FIM efficiency (per week) were lower in the dementia group [relative FIM score change of dementia vs non-dementia, respectively, 26.2% <i>vs</i>. 44.0% (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and FIM efficiency, 6.5 <i>vs</i>. 8.9 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001)]. Discharge destination between the two groups was statistically different, with 35.7% of patients with dementia being discharged to residential aged care facilities (RACFs) compared to 21.7% of those without dementia (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). More patients with dementia had carers in their private residence in the post-rehabilitation phase, 82.2% <i>vs</i>. 57.6% (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with dementia who sustain a fractured hip benefit from inpatient rehabilitation, although their clinical outcomes are not as good as those without dementia. FIM change and FIM efficiency were lower in the dementia group. Length of stay in the hospital for patients with dementia was shorter due to earlier recognition for the need for placement in either an RACF or at home with carer support. The need for placement in an RACF or carer support in a private residence was significantly greater in the dementia group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":32862,"journal":{"name":"Aging Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agm2.12251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agm2.12251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes between patients for whom their participation in inpatient rehabilitation was and was not impacted by dementia through matching patients reporting dementia (dementia group) with those not reporting dementia (non-dementia group).

Methods

Prospectively collected data held by the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcome Centre (AROC) were analyzed for patients aged 65 years or older receiving inpatient rehabilitation in public hospitals in Australia following a hip fracture and discharged between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2019. Patients reported as having dementia impacting their rehabilitation program were matched to patients not reporting dementia based on age, admission motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, and accommodation prior to rehabilitation. The matched cohorts were compared in relation to clinical outcomes (motor and cognitive FIM improvement, FIM efficiency, length of stay, and discharge destination) following participation in hospital-based rehabilitation using univariate analysis.

Results

Patients with dementia had significantly lower cognitive FIM scores on commencing rehabilitation (17.6 and 26.9, respectively, P < 0.001) and their median length of stay was 2 days shorter than those without dementia (21 and 23 days, respectively, P < 0.001). Relative change in FIM score and FIM efficiency (per week) were lower in the dementia group [relative FIM score change of dementia vs non-dementia, respectively, 26.2% vs. 44.0% (P < 0.001) and FIM efficiency, 6.5 vs. 8.9 (P < 0.001)]. Discharge destination between the two groups was statistically different, with 35.7% of patients with dementia being discharged to residential aged care facilities (RACFs) compared to 21.7% of those without dementia (P < 0.001). More patients with dementia had carers in their private residence in the post-rehabilitation phase, 82.2% vs. 57.6% (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with dementia who sustain a fractured hip benefit from inpatient rehabilitation, although their clinical outcomes are not as good as those without dementia. FIM change and FIM efficiency were lower in the dementia group. Length of stay in the hospital for patients with dementia was shorter due to earlier recognition for the need for placement in either an RACF or at home with carer support. The need for placement in an RACF or carer support in a private residence was significantly greater in the dementia group.

Abstract Image

痴呆对髋部骨折后康复结果的影响
目的通过将报告痴呆的患者(痴呆组)与未报告痴呆的患者(非痴呆组)进行匹配,比较住院康复受痴呆影响和不受痴呆影响的患者的临床结果。方法前瞻性收集澳大利亚康复结果中心(AROC)持有的数据,分析2014年7月1日至2019年6月30日期间在澳大利亚公立医院接受髋部骨折住院康复并出院的65岁及以上患者。根据年龄、入院运动功能独立测量(FIM)评分和康复前的住宿情况,将报告患有痴呆症的患者与未报告患有痴呆症的患者进行匹配。采用单变量分析比较匹配队列参与医院康复后的临床结果(运动和认知FIM改善、FIM效率、住院时间和出院目的地)。结果痴呆患者在康复开始时的认知FIM评分显著低于无痴呆患者(分别为17.6和26.9,P < 0.001),其中位住院时间比无痴呆患者短2天(分别为21和23天,P < 0.001)。痴呆组FIM评分和FIM效率(每周)的相对变化较低[痴呆组与非痴呆组FIM评分的相对变化分别为26.2%对44.0% (P < 0.001)和6.5对8.9 (P < 0.001)]。两组患者的出院目的地有统计学差异,有35.7%的痴呆患者出院到住宅老年护理机构(RACFs),而无痴呆患者出院到住宅老年护理机构的比例为21.7% (P < 0.001)。在康复后阶段,更多的痴呆患者在其私人住宅中有照顾者,82.2%比57.6% (P < 0.001)。结论失智性髋部骨折患者的住院康复效果优于非失智性髋部骨折患者。痴呆组的FIM变化和FIM效率较低。痴呆症患者住院时间较短,因为他们较早认识到需要安置在儿童福利院或有护理人员支持的家中。在痴呆症组中,需要安置在RACF或私人住宅的护理人员支持的需求显着增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging Medicine
Aging Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信