Machine-learning based prediction models for assessing skin irritation and corrosion potential of liquid chemicals using physicochemical properties by XGBoost.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicological Research Pub Date : 2023-01-23 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8
Yeonsoo Kang, Myeong Gyu Kim, Kyung-Min Lim
{"title":"Machine-learning based prediction models for assessing skin irritation and corrosion potential of liquid chemicals using physicochemical properties by XGBoost.","authors":"Yeonsoo Kang, Myeong Gyu Kim, Kyung-Min Lim","doi":"10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin irritation test is an essential part of the safety assessment of chemicals. Recently, computational models to predict the skin irritation draw attention as alternatives to animal testing. We developed prediction models on skin irritation/corrosion of liquid chemicals using machine learning algorithms, with 34 physicochemical descriptors calculated from the structure. The training and test dataset of 545 liquid chemicals with reliable in vivo skin hazard classifications based on UN Globally Harmonized System [category 1 (corrosive, Cat 1), 2 (irritant, Cat 2), 3 (mild irritant, Cat 3), and no category (nonirritant, NC)] were collected from public databases. After the curation of input data through removal and correlation analysis, every model was constructed to predict skin hazard classification for liquid chemicals with 22 physicochemical descriptors. Seven machine learning algorithms [Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, Support vector machine, Random Forest, Extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and Neural net] were applied to ternary and binary classification of skin hazard. XGB model demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.73-0.81), sensitivity (0.71-0.92), and positive predictive value (0.65-0.81). The contribution of physicochemical descriptors to the classification was analyzed using Shapley Additive exPlanations plot to provide an insight into the skin irritation of chemicals.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10050629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin irritation test is an essential part of the safety assessment of chemicals. Recently, computational models to predict the skin irritation draw attention as alternatives to animal testing. We developed prediction models on skin irritation/corrosion of liquid chemicals using machine learning algorithms, with 34 physicochemical descriptors calculated from the structure. The training and test dataset of 545 liquid chemicals with reliable in vivo skin hazard classifications based on UN Globally Harmonized System [category 1 (corrosive, Cat 1), 2 (irritant, Cat 2), 3 (mild irritant, Cat 3), and no category (nonirritant, NC)] were collected from public databases. After the curation of input data through removal and correlation analysis, every model was constructed to predict skin hazard classification for liquid chemicals with 22 physicochemical descriptors. Seven machine learning algorithms [Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, Support vector machine, Random Forest, Extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and Neural net] were applied to ternary and binary classification of skin hazard. XGB model demonstrated the highest accuracy (0.73-0.81), sensitivity (0.71-0.92), and positive predictive value (0.65-0.81). The contribution of physicochemical descriptors to the classification was analyzed using Shapley Additive exPlanations plot to provide an insight into the skin irritation of chemicals.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8.

基于机器学习的预测模型,利用 XGBoost 的物理化学特性评估液体化学品的皮肤刺激性和腐蚀潜力。
皮肤刺激测试是化学品安全评估的重要组成部分。最近,预测皮肤刺激性的计算模型作为动物试验的替代方法引起了人们的关注。我们利用机器学习算法开发了液态化学品皮肤刺激性/腐蚀性预测模型,并从结构中计算出 34 个理化描述因子。我们从公共数据库中收集了 545 种液体化学品的训练和测试数据集,这些数据集具有基于联合国全球统一制度的可靠的体内皮肤危害分类[类别 1(腐蚀性,Cat 1)、2(刺激性,Cat 2)、3(轻度刺激性,Cat 3)和无类别(无刺激性,NC)]。通过删除和相关性分析对输入数据进行整理后,构建了每个模型来预测含有 22 个理化描述符的液体化学品的皮肤危害分类。七种机器学习算法(逻辑回归、奈夫贝叶斯、k-近邻、支持向量机、随机森林、极端梯度提升(XGB)和神经网络)被应用于皮肤危害的三元和二元分类。XGB 模型的准确度(0.73-0.81)、灵敏度(0.71-0.92)和阳性预测值(0.65-0.81)最高。利用 Shapley Additive exPlanations plot 分析了理化描述因子对分类的贡献,从而深入了解化学品对皮肤的刺激性:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s43188-022-00168-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信