Fat in the Fossa and the Sphenoid Sinus: A Simple and Effective Solution to CSF Leaks in Transsphenoidal Surgery. Cohort Study and Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Asfand Baig Mirza, Timothy Boardman, Mohamed Okasha, Hazem Mohamed El-Hariri, Qusai Al Banna, Christoforos Syrris, Kaumal Baig Mirza, Amisha Vastani, Ravindran Visagan, Jonathan Shapey, Eleni Maratos, Sinan Barazi, Nick Thomas
{"title":"Fat in the Fossa and the Sphenoid Sinus: A Simple and Effective Solution to CSF Leaks in Transsphenoidal Surgery. Cohort Study and Systematic Review.","authors":"Asfand Baig Mirza,&nbsp;Timothy Boardman,&nbsp;Mohamed Okasha,&nbsp;Hazem Mohamed El-Hariri,&nbsp;Qusai Al Banna,&nbsp;Christoforos Syrris,&nbsp;Kaumal Baig Mirza,&nbsp;Amisha Vastani,&nbsp;Ravindran Visagan,&nbsp;Jonathan Shapey,&nbsp;Eleni Maratos,&nbsp;Sinan Barazi,&nbsp;Nick Thomas","doi":"10.1055/a-1757-3069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains a challenge and is associated with high morbidity. We perform a primary repair with f at in the pituitary f ossa and further fat in the s phenoid sinus (FFS). We compare the efficacy of this FFS technique with other repair methods and perform a systematic review. <b>Design, Patients, and Methods</b>  This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing standard TSS from 2009 to 2020, comparing the incidence of significant postoperative CSF rhinorrhea (requiring intervention) using the FFS technique compared with other intraoperative repair strategies. Systematic review of current repair methods described in the literature was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. <b>Results</b>  In all, there were 439 patients, with 276 patients undergoing multilayer repair, 68 patients FFS repair, and 95 patients no repair. No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics between the groups. Postoperative CSF leak requiring intervention was significantly lower in the FFS repair group (4.4%) compared with the multilayer (20.3%) and no repair groups (12.6%, <i>p</i>  < 0.01). This translated to fewer reoperations (2.9% FFS vs. 13.4% multilayer vs. 8.4% no repair, <i>p</i>  < 0.05), fewer lumbar drains (2.9% FFS vs. 15.6% multilayer vs. 5.3% no repair, <i>p</i>  < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median days: 4 [3-7] FFS vs. 6 (5-10) multilayer vs. 5 (3-7) no repair, <i>p</i>  < 0.01). Risk factors for postoperative leak included female gender, perioperative lumbar drain, and intraoperative leak. <b>Conclusion</b>  Autologous fat on fat graft for standard endoscopic transsphenoidal approach effectively reduces the risk of significant postoperative CSF leak with reduced reoperation and shorter hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":"84 2","pages":"143-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991530/pdf/10-1055-a-1757-3069.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1757-3069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives  Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) remains a challenge and is associated with high morbidity. We perform a primary repair with f at in the pituitary f ossa and further fat in the s phenoid sinus (FFS). We compare the efficacy of this FFS technique with other repair methods and perform a systematic review. Design, Patients, and Methods  This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing standard TSS from 2009 to 2020, comparing the incidence of significant postoperative CSF rhinorrhea (requiring intervention) using the FFS technique compared with other intraoperative repair strategies. Systematic review of current repair methods described in the literature was performed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results  In all, there were 439 patients, with 276 patients undergoing multilayer repair, 68 patients FFS repair, and 95 patients no repair. No significant differences were observed in baseline demographics between the groups. Postoperative CSF leak requiring intervention was significantly lower in the FFS repair group (4.4%) compared with the multilayer (20.3%) and no repair groups (12.6%, p  < 0.01). This translated to fewer reoperations (2.9% FFS vs. 13.4% multilayer vs. 8.4% no repair, p  < 0.05), fewer lumbar drains (2.9% FFS vs. 15.6% multilayer vs. 5.3% no repair, p  < 0.01), and shorter hospital stay (median days: 4 [3-7] FFS vs. 6 (5-10) multilayer vs. 5 (3-7) no repair, p  < 0.01). Risk factors for postoperative leak included female gender, perioperative lumbar drain, and intraoperative leak. Conclusion  Autologous fat on fat graft for standard endoscopic transsphenoidal approach effectively reduces the risk of significant postoperative CSF leak with reduced reoperation and shorter hospital stay.

颅窝及蝶窦脂肪:经蝶窦手术中脑脊液渗漏的简单有效方法。队列研究和系统评价。
目的内镜下经蝶窦手术(TSS)后脑脊液(CSF)泄漏仍然是一个挑战,并与高发病率相关。我们使用垂体窝内的脂肪和蝶窦内的脂肪进行初步修复。我们比较了这种FFS技术与其他修复方法的效果,并进行了系统的回顾。设计、患者和方法本研究回顾性分析了2009年至2020年接受标准TSS的患者,比较了使用FFS技术与其他术中修复策略相比术后显著脑脊液鼻漏(需要干预)的发生率。按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对文献中描述的当前修复方法进行系统评价。结果共439例患者,其中多层修复276例,FFS修复68例,未修复95例。两组之间的基线人口统计学没有观察到显著差异。与多层修复组(20.3%)和无修复组(12.6%)相比,FFS修复组(4.4%)术后需要干预的脑脊液漏发生率明显降低(pp pp)结论自体脂肪加脂肪移植用于标准内镜下经蝶窦入路可有效降低术后严重脑脊液漏的风险,减少再手术次数,缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
516
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies. JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信