Membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange: Proposed techniques for preventing filter failure

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Ibrahim Elali MD, Deep Phachu MD, Nick Coombs MD, Mamta Shah MD, Jordan Dean, Lalarukh Haider MD, Yanlin Wang MD, Andre A Kaplan MD
{"title":"Membrane-based therapeutic plasma exchange: Proposed techniques for preventing filter failure","authors":"Ibrahim Elali MD,&nbsp;Deep Phachu MD,&nbsp;Nick Coombs MD,&nbsp;Mamta Shah MD,&nbsp;Jordan Dean,&nbsp;Lalarukh Haider MD,&nbsp;Yanlin Wang MD,&nbsp;Andre A Kaplan MD","doi":"10.1002/jca.22065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is commonly performed using membrane-based TPE (mTPE) and is prone to filter failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Setting, Participants, &amp; Measurements</h3>\n \n <p>We report on 46 patients, with a total of 321 mTPE treatments using the NxStage machine. This was a retrospective study with an aim to evaluate the effect of heparin, pre-filter saline dilution and the impact of total plasma volume exchanged (&lt; 3 L vs. ≥3 L) on the rate of filter failure. Primary outcome was the overall rate of filter failure. Secondary outcomes included factors that may have indirectly influenced the rate of filter failure, including hematocrit, platelet count, replacement fluid (Fresh Frozen Plasma vs. albumin), and access type.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline had a statistically significant decrease in filter failure rate as compared to those that received neither (28.6% vs. 5.3%, <i>P</i> = .001), and compared to the treatments that received pre-filter heparin alone (14.2% vs. 5.3%, <i>P</i> = .015). In treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline predilution, we noted a significantly higher filter failure rate when the plasma volume exchanged was ≥3 L as compared to those that had &lt;3 L exchanged (12.2% vs. 0.9%, <i>P</i> = .001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Rate of filter failure in mTPE can be reduced by implementing several therapeutic interventions including pre-filter heparin and pre-filter saline solution. These interventions were not associated with any clinically significant adverse events. Despite the above-mentioned interventions, large plasma volume exchanges of ≥3 L can negatively impact filter life.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"38 5","pages":"555-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.22065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is commonly performed using membrane-based TPE (mTPE) and is prone to filter failure.

Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements

We report on 46 patients, with a total of 321 mTPE treatments using the NxStage machine. This was a retrospective study with an aim to evaluate the effect of heparin, pre-filter saline dilution and the impact of total plasma volume exchanged (< 3 L vs. ≥3 L) on the rate of filter failure. Primary outcome was the overall rate of filter failure. Secondary outcomes included factors that may have indirectly influenced the rate of filter failure, including hematocrit, platelet count, replacement fluid (Fresh Frozen Plasma vs. albumin), and access type.

Results

We found that treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline had a statistically significant decrease in filter failure rate as compared to those that received neither (28.6% vs. 5.3%, P = .001), and compared to the treatments that received pre-filter heparin alone (14.2% vs. 5.3%, P = .015). In treatments that received both pre-filter heparin and saline predilution, we noted a significantly higher filter failure rate when the plasma volume exchanged was ≥3 L as compared to those that had <3 L exchanged (12.2% vs. 0.9%, P = .001).

Conclusions

Rate of filter failure in mTPE can be reduced by implementing several therapeutic interventions including pre-filter heparin and pre-filter saline solution. These interventions were not associated with any clinically significant adverse events. Despite the above-mentioned interventions, large plasma volume exchanges of ≥3 L can negatively impact filter life.

基于膜的治疗性血浆交换:预防过滤器故障的拟议技术。
背景和目的:治疗性血浆置换(TPE)通常使用基于膜的TPE(mTPE)进行,并且容易发生过滤器故障。设计、设置、参与者和测量:我们报告了46名患者,共使用NxStage机器进行了321次mTPE治疗。这是一项回顾性研究,目的是评估肝素、预滤盐水稀释的效果和总血浆容量交换的影响(结果:我们发现,与未接受预滤肝素和盐水的治疗相比,同时接受预滤盐水和盐水的处理的滤器失败率在统计学上显著降低(28.6%对5.3%,P = .001),并且与单独接受预滤肝素的治疗相比(14.2%vs.5.3%,P = .015)。在同时接受预滤肝素和生理盐水预稀释的治疗中,我们注意到当血浆交换量≥3时,过滤器失效率明显更高 L。结论:通过实施包括预滤肝素和预滤盐水溶液在内的多种治疗干预措施,可以降低mTPE的过滤失败率。这些干预措施与任何具有临床意义的不良事件无关。尽管采取了上述干预措施,但大的血浆体积交换≥3 L会对过滤器寿命产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信