Defect in Automated Antigen Excess Detection Discovered after Reviewing Serum Free Light Chain Results in Context with Clinical Findings.

Kriselle Maris Lao, Ashbita Pokharel, Mai Mohamed Mohamed Ibrahim Elzieny, Elizabeth Sykes, Steven M Truscott
{"title":"Defect in Automated Antigen Excess Detection Discovered after Reviewing Serum Free Light Chain Results in Context with Clinical Findings.","authors":"Kriselle Maris Lao, Ashbita Pokharel, Mai Mohamed Mohamed Ibrahim Elzieny, Elizabeth Sykes, Steven M Truscott","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serum κ and λ free light chains can be markedly elevated in monoclonal gammopathies; consequently, serum free light chain (sFLC) immunoassays are susceptible to inaccuracies caused by antigen excess. As a result, diagnostics manufacturers have attempted to automate antigen excess detection. A 75-year-old African-American woman had laboratory findings consistent with severe anemia, acute kidney injury, and moderate hypercalcemia. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and sFLC testing were ordered. The sFLC results initially showed mildly elevated free λ light chains and normal free κ. The pathologist noted that sFLC results were discrepant with the bone marrow biopsy, electrophoresis, and immunofixation results. After manual dilution of the serum, repeat sFLC testing revealed significantly higher λ sFLC results. Antigen excess causing falsely low sFLC quantitation may not be detected by immunoassay instruments as intended. Correlation with clinical history, serum and urine protein electrophoresis results, and other laboratory findings is essential when interpreting sFLC results.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"106-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serum κ and λ free light chains can be markedly elevated in monoclonal gammopathies; consequently, serum free light chain (sFLC) immunoassays are susceptible to inaccuracies caused by antigen excess. As a result, diagnostics manufacturers have attempted to automate antigen excess detection. A 75-year-old African-American woman had laboratory findings consistent with severe anemia, acute kidney injury, and moderate hypercalcemia. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and sFLC testing were ordered. The sFLC results initially showed mildly elevated free λ light chains and normal free κ. The pathologist noted that sFLC results were discrepant with the bone marrow biopsy, electrophoresis, and immunofixation results. After manual dilution of the serum, repeat sFLC testing revealed significantly higher λ sFLC results. Antigen excess causing falsely low sFLC quantitation may not be detected by immunoassay instruments as intended. Correlation with clinical history, serum and urine protein electrophoresis results, and other laboratory findings is essential when interpreting sFLC results.

结合临床结果审查血清游离轻链结果后发现抗原过量自动检测缺陷
在单克隆丙种球蛋白病中,血清κ和λ游离轻链会明显升高;因此,血清游离轻链(sFLC)免疫测定很容易因抗原过量而出现误差。因此,诊断产品制造商已尝试自动检测抗原过量。一名 75 岁的非裔美国妇女的实验室检查结果与严重贫血、急性肾损伤和中度高钙血症一致。她被要求进行血清和尿蛋白电泳以及 sFLC 检测。sFLC 结果初步显示游离λ轻链轻度升高,游离κ正常。病理学家注意到,sFLC结果与骨髓活检、电泳和免疫固定结果不符。人工稀释血清后,重复sFLC检测发现λ sFLC结果明显升高。免疫测定仪器可能无法检测到抗原过量导致的 sFLC 定量错误偏低。在解释 sFLC 结果时,必须与临床病史、血清和尿蛋白电泳结果以及其他实验室结果相互关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信