Chamber-based system for measuring whole-plant transpiration dynamics.

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2022-11-02 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pei3.10094
Alejandro Pieters, Marcus Giese, Marc Schmierer, Kristian Johnson, Folkard Asch
{"title":"Chamber-based system for measuring whole-plant transpiration dynamics.","authors":"Alejandro Pieters, Marcus Giese, Marc Schmierer, Kristian Johnson, Folkard Asch","doi":"10.1002/pei3.10094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most of our insights on whole-plant transpiration <i>(E)</i> are based on leaf-chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and <i>E</i> can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for <i>E</i> but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber-based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of <i>E</i> to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5-3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species-specific responses of <i>E</i> to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric-chamber-based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on <i>E</i>, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74457,"journal":{"name":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"3 6","pages":"243-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most of our insights on whole-plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf-chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for E but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber-based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of E to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5-3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species-specific responses of E to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric-chamber-based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on E, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于测量整株植物蒸腾动态的箱式系统。
我们对整株植物蒸腾作用(E)的了解大多基于使用水蒸气孔隙仪、IRGA 或通量测量法进行的叶室测量。重力测量方法综合、准确,而且可以明确区分蒸发和蒸腾。水汽压差(VPD)是蒸发的驱动力,但由于其他气候驱动力的混杂影响,对其影响的评估一直难以进行。我们开发了一种基于室内重力测量的方法,可以在保持其他环境参数为预定值的情况下,评估整个植物对水汽压差的反应。在改变流量设置后 5 分钟内就能达到稳定的 VPD 值(0.5-3.7 千帕),并至少维持 45 分钟。使用的物种在生命形式和光合代谢方面各不相同。涵盖 VPD 范围的典型运行持续时间长达 4 小时,以防止出现适应反应或土壤缺水。可以确定 E 对 VPD 的物种特异性反应,以及叶片传导性的差异。所介绍的基于重力测定室的组合系统克服了以往重力测定装置在可复制性、时间和阐明特定环境驱动因素对 E 的影响方面的一些局限性,填补了方法学上的空白,并拓宽了我们的表型能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信