Commercially manufactured spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Max Jaenisch, Soufian Ben Amar, Mari Babasiz, Charlotte Rommelspacher, Matthias Dominik Wimmer, Dieter Christian Wirtz, Thomas Martin Randau
{"title":"Commercially manufactured spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip.","authors":"Max Jaenisch,&nbsp;Soufian Ben Amar,&nbsp;Mari Babasiz,&nbsp;Charlotte Rommelspacher,&nbsp;Matthias Dominik Wimmer,&nbsp;Dieter Christian Wirtz,&nbsp;Thomas Martin Randau","doi":"10.1007/s00064-023-00802-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection remains a common and serious complication after hip arthroplasty. To improve function and patient comfort after joint removal in two-stage revision, commercially manufactured spacers for the hip joint allow retention of the anatomical joint geometry thereby limiting soft tissue contraction and allow mobilization.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip, septic arthritis with severe destruction of the hip cartilage and/or bone requiring arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Allergies to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotics, severe hip dysplasia with insufficient cranial support, incompliant patient, large osseous defect of the acetabulum, insufficient metaphyseal/diaphyseal support of the femoral bone, resistance of the microbiological pathogen to spacer-inert antibiotic medication, inability to perform primary wound closure requiring temporary open-wound therapy.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Preoperative templating on radiograph; removal of joint prosthesis and thorough debridement with removal of all foreign material; trial spacer selection and insertion and trial reduction of the joint, fixing the spacer with PMMA to the proximal femur, final reduction, radiograph and stability test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analyzed from patients treated between 2016 and 2021. In all, 20 patients were treated with preformed spacers and 16 with custom-made spacers. Pathogens were detected in 23 of the 36 cases (64%). Polymicrobial infections were present in 8 of 36 cases (22%). In patients who received preformed spacers, there were 6 cases of spacer-related complications (30%). Of the 36 patients (83%), 30 were reimplanted with a new implant; 3 patients died due to septic or other complications before reimplantation (8%). Average follow-up was 20.2 months after reimplantation. There were no major differences between the two groups of spacers. Patient comfort was not measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":54677,"journal":{"name":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","volume":"35 3-4","pages":"179-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-023-00802-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection remains a common and serious complication after hip arthroplasty. To improve function and patient comfort after joint removal in two-stage revision, commercially manufactured spacers for the hip joint allow retention of the anatomical joint geometry thereby limiting soft tissue contraction and allow mobilization.

Indications: Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip, septic arthritis with severe destruction of the hip cartilage and/or bone requiring arthroplasty.

Contraindications: Allergies to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or antibiotics, severe hip dysplasia with insufficient cranial support, incompliant patient, large osseous defect of the acetabulum, insufficient metaphyseal/diaphyseal support of the femoral bone, resistance of the microbiological pathogen to spacer-inert antibiotic medication, inability to perform primary wound closure requiring temporary open-wound therapy.

Surgical technique: Preoperative templating on radiograph; removal of joint prosthesis and thorough debridement with removal of all foreign material; trial spacer selection and insertion and trial reduction of the joint, fixing the spacer with PMMA to the proximal femur, final reduction, radiograph and stability test.

Results: Data were analyzed from patients treated between 2016 and 2021. In all, 20 patients were treated with preformed spacers and 16 with custom-made spacers. Pathogens were detected in 23 of the 36 cases (64%). Polymicrobial infections were present in 8 of 36 cases (22%). In patients who received preformed spacers, there were 6 cases of spacer-related complications (30%). Of the 36 patients (83%), 30 were reimplanted with a new implant; 3 patients died due to septic or other complications before reimplantation (8%). Average follow-up was 20.2 months after reimplantation. There were no major differences between the two groups of spacers. Patient comfort was not measured.

商业生产的用于治疗髋关节假体周围关节感染的垫片。
背景:人工关节周围感染仍然是髋关节置换术后常见且严重的并发症。为了改善两阶段翻修中关节移除后的功能和患者舒适度,商业制造的髋关节垫片可以保留关节解剖几何形状,从而限制软组织收缩并允许活动。适应症:髋关节假体周围感染,脓毒性关节炎,严重破坏髋关节软骨和/或骨,需要关节置换。禁忌症:对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)或抗生素过敏,严重髋关节发育不良伴颅骨支撑不足,患者不适应,髋臼骨缺损大,股骨干骺端/干骺端支撑不足,微生物病原体对间隔惰性抗生素药物耐药,无法进行初级伤口闭合需要临时开放伤口治疗。手术技术:术前x线片模板;取出关节假体,彻底清创,清除所有异物;试验垫片的选择和插入,试验关节复位,用PMMA将垫片固定在股骨近端,最终复位,x线片和稳定性测试。结果:数据分析来自2016年至2021年期间接受治疗的患者。总共有20名患者使用预成型的垫片,16名患者使用定制的垫片。36例中检出病原菌23例(64%)。36例中有8例(22%)存在多微生物感染。在接受预成型垫片的患者中,有6例垫片相关并发症(30%)。在36例患者(83%)中,30例重新植入了新的种植体;3例患者在再植前因脓毒症或其他并发症死亡(8%)。再植后平均随访20.2个月。两组间隔剂之间没有显著差异。没有测量患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedics and Traumatology is directed toward all orthopedic surgeons, trauma-tologists, hand surgeons, specialists in sports injuries, orthopedics and rheumatology as well as gene-al surgeons who require access to reliable information on current operative methods to ensure the quality of patient advice, preoperative planning, and postoperative care. The journal presents established and new operative procedures in uniformly structured and extensively illustrated contributions. All aspects are presented step-by-step from indications, contraindications, patient education, and preparation of the operation right through to postoperative care. The advantages and disadvantages, possible complications, deficiencies and risks of the methods as well as significant results with their evaluation criteria are discussed. To allow the reader to assess the outcome, results are detailed and based on internationally recognized scoring systems. Orthopedics and Traumatology facilitates effective advancement and further education for all those active in both special and conservative fields of orthopedics, traumatology, and general surgery, offers sup-port for therapeutic decision-making, and provides – more than 30 years after its first publication – constantly expanding and up-to-date teaching on operative techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信