AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in early maturing cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] landraces in Ethiopia.

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2021-12-23 eCollection Date: 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1002/pei3.10068
Yirga Kindie, Bulti Tesso, Berhanu Amsalu
{"title":"AMMI and GGE biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in early maturing cowpea [<i>Vigna unguiculata</i> (L) Walp] landraces in Ethiopia.","authors":"Yirga Kindie, Bulti Tesso, Berhanu Amsalu","doi":"10.1002/pei3.10068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cowpea is one of the most important grain legumes for human consumption and animal feeding. Despite this importance, its production is hampered by biotic and abiotic constraints. Genotype by environment interaction study was performed to identify the most stable cowpea genotype(s) and the desirable environment(s) for cowpea research in Ethiopia. Twenty-four cowpea landraces and one standard check were evaluated for grain yield and yield-related traits at six locations (Sekota, Kobo, Sirinka, Melkassa, Mieso, and Babile) using 5 × 5 triple lattice during 2019. Combined analysis of variance showed that grain yield was significantly affected by environments, genotypes, and GE interactions. AMMI analysis revealed the contribution of environment, genotype, and GEI for 29.79%, 15.6%, and 42.06% of variation on grain yield. The first two principal components explained 57.97% of the total GEI variance. AMMI model selected G24 as 1st and 2nd best genotype at five environments. The polygon view of the GGE biplot identified three mega-environments (ME1, ME2, and ME3) with winning genotypes: G24, G3, and G16, respectively. The highest productive (2528.8 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) environment, miesso has been identified as the most; discriminating and representative testing environment whereas the lowest productive (1676.1 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) Sirinka was the least discriminating and representative. The highest yielder G24 (2632 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) was identified as the \"ideal\" and the most stable genotype followed by G16 (2290 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) while the least stable and low yielder was G11. Therefore, genotypes G24 and G16 were recommended for verification and commercial production in most cowpea growing areas of Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":74457,"journal":{"name":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cowpea is one of the most important grain legumes for human consumption and animal feeding. Despite this importance, its production is hampered by biotic and abiotic constraints. Genotype by environment interaction study was performed to identify the most stable cowpea genotype(s) and the desirable environment(s) for cowpea research in Ethiopia. Twenty-four cowpea landraces and one standard check were evaluated for grain yield and yield-related traits at six locations (Sekota, Kobo, Sirinka, Melkassa, Mieso, and Babile) using 5 × 5 triple lattice during 2019. Combined analysis of variance showed that grain yield was significantly affected by environments, genotypes, and GE interactions. AMMI analysis revealed the contribution of environment, genotype, and GEI for 29.79%, 15.6%, and 42.06% of variation on grain yield. The first two principal components explained 57.97% of the total GEI variance. AMMI model selected G24 as 1st and 2nd best genotype at five environments. The polygon view of the GGE biplot identified three mega-environments (ME1, ME2, and ME3) with winning genotypes: G24, G3, and G16, respectively. The highest productive (2528.8 kg ha-1) environment, miesso has been identified as the most; discriminating and representative testing environment whereas the lowest productive (1676.1 kg ha-1) Sirinka was the least discriminating and representative. The highest yielder G24 (2632 kg ha-1) was identified as the "ideal" and the most stable genotype followed by G16 (2290 kg ha-1) while the least stable and low yielder was G11. Therefore, genotypes G24 and G16 were recommended for verification and commercial production in most cowpea growing areas of Ethiopia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃塞俄比亚早熟豇豆 [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] 陆上品系基因型与环境交互作用及产量稳定性的 AMMI 和 GGE 双图分析。
豇豆是人类消费和动物饲养最重要的谷物豆类之一。尽管如此重要,其生产却受到生物和非生物因素的制约。为确定埃塞俄比亚豇豆研究中最稳定的豇豆基因型和最理想的环境,进行了基因型与环境交互作用研究。2019 年,研究人员在六个地点(Sekota、Kobo、Sirinka、Melkassa、Mieso 和 Babile)采用 5 × 5 三重网格法对 24 个豇豆地方品种和一个标准对照进行了谷物产量和产量相关性状的评估。综合方差分析显示,谷物产量受环境、基因型和 GE 交互作用的显著影响。AMMI 分析显示,环境、基因型和 GEI 对谷物产量变异的贡献率分别为 29.79%、15.6% 和 42.06%。前两个主成分解释了 57.97% 的 GEI 总变异。AMMI 模型选择 G24 为五种环境下的第一和第二最佳基因型。GGE 双图的多边形视图确定了三个特大环境(ME1、ME2 和 ME3),其优胜基因型分别为 G24、G3 和 G24:分别为 G24、G3 和 G16。产量最高(2528.8 千克/公顷-1)的环境 miesso 被确定为最具区分度和代表性的测试环境,而产量最低(1676.1 千克/公顷-1)的 Sirinka 则是区分度和代表性最低的环境。产量最高的 G24(2632 千克/公顷-1)被认定为 "理想 "和最稳定的基因型,其次是 G16(2290 千克/公顷-1),而最不稳定和低产的基因型是 G11。因此,建议在埃塞俄比亚大部分豇豆种植区对基因型 G24 和 G16 进行验证并进行商业化生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信