The "when" matters: Evidence from memory markers in the clinical continuum of Alzheimer's disease.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1037/neu0000891
Gonzalo Forno, Mario A Parra, Daniela Thumala, Roque Villagra, Mauricio Cerda, Pedro Zitko, Agustín Ibañez, Patricia Lillo, Andrea Slachevsky
{"title":"The \"when\" matters: Evidence from memory markers in the clinical continuum of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Gonzalo Forno, Mario A Parra, Daniela Thumala, Roque Villagra, Mauricio Cerda, Pedro Zitko, Agustín Ibañez, Patricia Lillo, Andrea Slachevsky","doi":"10.1037/neu0000891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive assessment able to detect impairments in the early neuropathological stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is urgently needed. The visual short-term memory binding task (VSTMBT) and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) have been recommended by the neurodegenerative disease working group as promising tests to aid in the early detection of AD. In this study, we investigated their complementary value across the clinical stages of the AD continuum.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and seventeen older adults with subjective cognitive complaint (SCC), 79 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31 patients with AD dementia (ADD), and 37 cognitively unimpaired (CU) subjects, underwent assessment with the VSTMBT and the picture version of the Spanish FCSRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for multiple comparisons, significant differences were found across groups. The VSTMBT was the only test that \"marginally\" differentiated between CU and SCC (<i>d</i> = 0.47, <i>p</i> = .052). Moreover, whereas the FCSRT showed a gradient (CU = SCC) > MCI > ADD, the VSTMBT gradient was CU > SCC > (MCI = ADD) suggesting that conjunctive binding deficits assessed by the latter may be sensitive to the very early stages of the disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the VSTMBT and the FCSRT are sensitive to the clinical continuum of AD. Whereas the former detects changes in the early prodromal stages, the latter is more sensitive to the advanced prodromal stages of AD. These novel tests can aid in the early detection, monitor disease progression and response to treatment, and thus support drug development programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"753-768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive assessment able to detect impairments in the early neuropathological stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is urgently needed. The visual short-term memory binding task (VSTMBT) and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) have been recommended by the neurodegenerative disease working group as promising tests to aid in the early detection of AD. In this study, we investigated their complementary value across the clinical stages of the AD continuum.

Method: One hundred and seventeen older adults with subjective cognitive complaint (SCC), 79 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31 patients with AD dementia (ADD), and 37 cognitively unimpaired (CU) subjects, underwent assessment with the VSTMBT and the picture version of the Spanish FCSRT.

Results: After controlling for multiple comparisons, significant differences were found across groups. The VSTMBT was the only test that "marginally" differentiated between CU and SCC (d = 0.47, p = .052). Moreover, whereas the FCSRT showed a gradient (CU = SCC) > MCI > ADD, the VSTMBT gradient was CU > SCC > (MCI = ADD) suggesting that conjunctive binding deficits assessed by the latter may be sensitive to the very early stages of the disease.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the VSTMBT and the FCSRT are sensitive to the clinical continuum of AD. Whereas the former detects changes in the early prodromal stages, the latter is more sensitive to the advanced prodromal stages of AD. These novel tests can aid in the early detection, monitor disease progression and response to treatment, and thus support drug development programs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

“何时”很重要:阿尔茨海默病临床连续体中记忆标记物的证据。
目的:迫切需要能够检测阿尔茨海默病(AD)早期神经病理学阶段损伤的认知评估。视觉短期记忆结合任务(VSTMBT)和自由提示选择性提醒测试(FCSRT)已被神经退行性疾病工作组推荐为有助于AD早期检测的有前景的测试。在本研究中,我们研究了它们在AD连续体临床阶段的互补价值。方法:采用VSTMBT和西班牙FCSRT图片版对117名有主观认知主诉(SCC)的老年人、79名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者、31名AD痴呆(ADD)患者和37名认知未受损(CU)受试者进行评估。VSTMBT是唯一“略微”区分CU和SCC的测试(d=0.47,p=0.052)。此外,尽管FCSRT显示出梯度(CU=SCC)>MCI>ADD,但VSTMBT的梯度为CU>SCC>(MCI=ADD),这表明后者评估的结膜结合缺陷可能对疾病的早期阶段敏感。结论:我们的研究结果表明,VSTMBT和FCSRT对AD的临床连续性敏感。前者检测AD早期前驱期的变化,后者对AD晚期前驱期更敏感。这些新的测试可以帮助早期检测,监测疾病进展和治疗反应,从而支持药物开发计划。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信