Engaging Nursing Students in Mental Health Concepts Through Multiple Teaching Modalities.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Kayla Carr, Kathleen A Rhodes, Melissa M Klamm, Sharon McElwain
{"title":"Engaging Nursing Students in Mental Health Concepts Through Multiple Teaching Modalities.","authors":"Kayla Carr,&nbsp;Kathleen A Rhodes,&nbsp;Melissa M Klamm,&nbsp;Sharon McElwain","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230315-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing multiple active learning strategies may facilitate knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude regarding mental health concepts in nursing students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Faculty in an accelerated 12-month baccalaureate nursing program delivered mental health nursing concepts utilizing team-based learning (TBL), a video response assignment, faculty-led clinical in an inpatient psychiatric hospital, and a standardized patient simulation. Twenty-two nursing students (71%) voluntarily completed a faculty-derived instrument to evaluate the efficacy of each learning experience on knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students favored in-person clinical (73%-91%) and TBL (68%-77%) in terms of the perceived effectiveness to improve knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude toward the mentally ill. Standardized patient experiences (45%-64%) were not rated as favorably but did fare better than video-response assignments (32%-45%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research is needed to provide a formal evaluation of mental health teaching modalities. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(6):359-363.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"62 6","pages":"359-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230315-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Utilizing multiple active learning strategies may facilitate knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude regarding mental health concepts in nursing students.

Method: Faculty in an accelerated 12-month baccalaureate nursing program delivered mental health nursing concepts utilizing team-based learning (TBL), a video response assignment, faculty-led clinical in an inpatient psychiatric hospital, and a standardized patient simulation. Twenty-two nursing students (71%) voluntarily completed a faculty-derived instrument to evaluate the efficacy of each learning experience on knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude.

Results: Students favored in-person clinical (73%-91%) and TBL (68%-77%) in terms of the perceived effectiveness to improve knowledge, critical thinking, communication, and attitude toward the mentally ill. Standardized patient experiences (45%-64%) were not rated as favorably but did fare better than video-response assignments (32%-45%).

Conclusion: Research is needed to provide a formal evaluation of mental health teaching modalities. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(6):359-363.].

通过多种教学方式吸引护生学习心理健康概念。
背景:利用多种主动学习策略可以促进护生对心理健康概念的知识、批判性思维、沟通和态度。方法:在为期12个月的加速护理学士学位课程中,教师利用基于团队的学习(TBL)、视频响应作业、教师主导的住院精神病医院临床和标准化的患者模拟,传授心理健康护理概念。22名护理专业学生(71%)自愿完成了一份教师衍生的工具,以评估每次学习经历在知识、批判性思维、沟通和态度方面的效果。结果:在提高对精神病患者的知识、批判性思维、沟通和态度的感知有效性方面,学生更倾向于面对面临床(73% ~ 91%)和TBL(68% ~ 77%)。标准化的患者体验(45%-64%)不被认为是有利的,但比视频应答分配(32%-45%)要好。结论:对心理健康教学模式进行正式评价尚需进一步研究。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;31(6):359-363。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信