‘No-one knows how to care for LGBT community like LGBT do’†: LGBTQIA+ experiences of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and Brazil

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Billy Tusker Haworth, Luan Carpes Barros Cassal, Tiago de Paula Muniz
{"title":"‘No-one knows how to care for LGBT community like LGBT do’†: LGBTQIA+ experiences of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom and Brazil","authors":"Billy Tusker Haworth,&nbsp;Luan Carpes Barros Cassal,&nbsp;Tiago de Paula Muniz","doi":"10.1111/disa.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The coronavirus pandemic and responses to it have had uneven impacts on different segments of societies. This study analysed the experiences of LGBTQIA+<sup>2</sup> people during the COVID-19 emergency, based on interviews in the United Kingdom and Brazil in 2020. The two countries are instructive cases, given the different social, cultural, economic, and political contexts. Pre-existing marginalisation shaped COVID-19 experiences in both settings, influencing the challenges faced, such as isolation or disruption to transgender healthcare, and coping strategies, including the important role of LGBTQIA+ volunteer and mutual aid groups. This paper argues that despite commonalities, there is no single LGBTQIA+ experience, and that disaster strategies will be ineffective until they recognise intersectionality and support the diversity of LGBTQIA+ populations. It concludes with a call for more inclusive disaster research, policy, and practice, which requires scrutinising the dominant cisgender–heteronormative structures that produce and reproduce LGBTQIA+ marginalisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9874727/pdf/DISA-9999-.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic and responses to it have had uneven impacts on different segments of societies. This study analysed the experiences of LGBTQIA+2 people during the COVID-19 emergency, based on interviews in the United Kingdom and Brazil in 2020. The two countries are instructive cases, given the different social, cultural, economic, and political contexts. Pre-existing marginalisation shaped COVID-19 experiences in both settings, influencing the challenges faced, such as isolation or disruption to transgender healthcare, and coping strategies, including the important role of LGBTQIA+ volunteer and mutual aid groups. This paper argues that despite commonalities, there is no single LGBTQIA+ experience, and that disaster strategies will be ineffective until they recognise intersectionality and support the diversity of LGBTQIA+ populations. It concludes with a call for more inclusive disaster research, policy, and practice, which requires scrutinising the dominant cisgender–heteronormative structures that produce and reproduce LGBTQIA+ marginalisation.

“没有人知道如何像LGBT那样关心LGBT社区”†:LGBTQIA+在英国和巴西的COVID-19经历
冠状病毒大流行及其应对措施对不同社会阶层产生了不平衡的影响。本研究基于2020年在英国和巴西的采访,分析了LGBTQIA+2人群在COVID-19紧急情况下的经历。考虑到两国不同的社会、文化、经济和政治背景,这两个国家是具有指导意义的案例。先前存在的边缘化影响了这两种情况下的COVID-19经历,影响了所面临的挑战,例如跨性别医疗隔离或中断,以及应对策略,包括LGBTQIA+志愿者和互助团体的重要作用。本文认为,尽管存在共性,但并不存在单一的LGBTQIA+经验,除非他们认识到交叉性并支持LGBTQIA+人群的多样性,否则灾难策略将是无效的。报告最后呼吁开展更具包容性的灾难研究、政策和实践,这需要仔细审查产生和再现LGBTQIA+边缘化的主流顺性-异性恋规范结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信