Comfort levels in discussing tobacco smoking among hospital staff in a children's hospital.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2023-06-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/162438
Yannan Li, Cordelia Eliaho, Bian Liu, Karen Wilson
{"title":"Comfort levels in discussing tobacco smoking among hospital staff in a children's hospital.","authors":"Yannan Li, Cordelia Eliaho, Bian Liu, Karen Wilson","doi":"10.18332/tpc/162438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital staff discussing smoking with children and their families can impact tobacco control, which is crucial in reducing the harmful effects of tobacco smoke exposure. Our study aims to assess staff comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and coworkers, after the implementation of a hospital-wide tobacco control policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 2340 staff members who completed an anonymous online survey in a large urban children's hospital in 2019. The main outcomes of interest were the comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and co-workers. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify whether the comfort level varied by sex, age, job type, and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the respondents (83.8%) were female, 41.2% were aged 18-35 years, 57.6% worked as clinical staff, and 15.5% were ever smokers. Compared to males, females were less likely to feel very comfortable in asking patients or their families about their smoking tobacco (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.92) or talking to co-workers about the health risks associated with their smoking (AOR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.54-0.93). Staff who were non-smokers were less likely to feel very comfortable in talking to co-workers about the health risks associated with their smoking (AOR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.45-0.78). The odds of feeling very comfortable in discussing smoking were consistently lower among those aged 18-35 years than their older counterparts. Clinical staff were more likely than non-clinical staff to feel very comfortable in discussing with patients and their parents about smoking, but there was no difference when talking to co-workers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found differences in staff comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and coworkers, by sex, age, job type, and smoking status. These results can guide training and identify potential barriers and improve tailored tobacco control training programs and policies for hospital staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/162438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital staff discussing smoking with children and their families can impact tobacco control, which is crucial in reducing the harmful effects of tobacco smoke exposure. Our study aims to assess staff comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and coworkers, after the implementation of a hospital-wide tobacco control policy.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 2340 staff members who completed an anonymous online survey in a large urban children's hospital in 2019. The main outcomes of interest were the comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and co-workers. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify whether the comfort level varied by sex, age, job type, and smoking status.

Results: Most of the respondents (83.8%) were female, 41.2% were aged 18-35 years, 57.6% worked as clinical staff, and 15.5% were ever smokers. Compared to males, females were less likely to feel very comfortable in asking patients or their families about their smoking tobacco (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.56-0.92) or talking to co-workers about the health risks associated with their smoking (AOR=0.71; 95% CI: 0.54-0.93). Staff who were non-smokers were less likely to feel very comfortable in talking to co-workers about the health risks associated with their smoking (AOR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.45-0.78). The odds of feeling very comfortable in discussing smoking were consistently lower among those aged 18-35 years than their older counterparts. Clinical staff were more likely than non-clinical staff to feel very comfortable in discussing with patients and their parents about smoking, but there was no difference when talking to co-workers.

Conclusions: We found differences in staff comfort level in discussing smoking with patients or their families, and coworkers, by sex, age, job type, and smoking status. These results can guide training and identify potential barriers and improve tailored tobacco control training programs and policies for hospital staff.

儿童医院员工在讨论吸烟问题时的舒适度。
简介:医院员工与儿童及其家人讨论吸烟问题会影响烟草控制,而烟草控制对减少烟草烟雾暴露的有害影响至关重要。我们的研究旨在评估在全院范围内实施控烟政策后,员工在与患者或其家属及同事讨论吸烟问题时的舒适度:这项横断面研究包括 2019 年在一家大型城市儿童医院完成匿名在线调查的 2340 名员工。我们关注的主要结果是与患者或其家属以及同事讨论吸烟问题时的舒适度。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定舒适度是否因性别、年龄、工作类型和吸烟状况而异:大多数受访者(83.8%)为女性,41.2%的受访者年龄在 18-35 岁之间,57.6%的受访者为临床工作人员,15.5%的受访者曾经吸烟。与男性相比,女性不太愿意向患者或其家属询问自己吸烟的情况(调整后的几率比,AOR=0.72;95% CI:0.56-0.92),也不太愿意与同事谈论吸烟对健康的危害(AOR=0.71;95% CI:0.54-0.93)。不吸烟的员工不太愿意与同事谈论吸烟对健康的危害(AOR=0.60;95% CI:0.45-0.78)。年龄在18-35岁之间的人在讨论吸烟问题时感到非常自在的几率一直低于年龄较大的人。临床医务人员比非临床医务人员更有可能在与患者及其家长讨论吸烟问题时感到非常轻松自如,但在与同事讨论时则没有差异:我们发现,不同性别、年龄、工种和吸烟状况的医务人员在与患者或其家属以及同事讨论吸烟问题时的舒适度存在差异。这些结果可以为培训提供指导,并找出潜在的障碍,改进为医院员工量身定制的控烟培训计划和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信