COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT CARBON DIOXIDE SOURCES IN COLLECTING MOSQUITO VECTOR SPECIES ON THE TEMPE CAMPUS OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY.

IF 0.9 4区农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2987/22-7094

Ndey Bassin Jobe, Silvie Huijben, James B Will, John Townsend, Krijn P Paaijmans

{"title":"COMPARING THE EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT CARBON DIOXIDE SOURCES IN COLLECTING MOSQUITO VECTOR SPECIES ON THE TEMPE CAMPUS OF ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY.","authors":"Ndey Bassin Jobe, Silvie Huijben, James B Will, John Townsend, Krijn P Paaijmans","doi":"10.2987/22-7094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the effectiveness of 4 different carbon dioxide (CO2) sources (sugar-fermented BG-CO2, sugar-fermented Fleischmann yeast, dry ice, and compressed gas cylinders) in attracting different mosquito species in 2 separate 4 × 4 Latin square trials. The CO2 generated by dry ice and the gas cylinders collected more Culex quinquefasciatus than the sugar-fermented BG-CO2 and Fleischmann yeasts during the 1st trial (16-h surveillance periods), but there was no significant difference in Aedes aegypti numbers. There were no significant differences between the different CO2 sources in collecting Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in the 2nd trial (24-h surveillance periods). Catches for Culiseta inornata and Cx. tarsalis were too low in both experiments for formal statistical analysis. Data can be used to inform local mosquito surveillance programs, but the selection of a CO2 source will also depend on financial and logistical constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":"39 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/22-7094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of 4 different carbon dioxide (CO2) sources (sugar-fermented BG-CO2, sugar-fermented Fleischmann yeast, dry ice, and compressed gas cylinders) in attracting different mosquito species in 2 separate 4 × 4 Latin square trials. The CO2 generated by dry ice and the gas cylinders collected more Culex quinquefasciatus than the sugar-fermented BG-CO2 and Fleischmann yeasts during the 1st trial (16-h surveillance periods), but there was no significant difference in Aedes aegypti numbers. There were no significant differences between the different CO2 sources in collecting Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in the 2nd trial (24-h surveillance periods). Catches for Culiseta inornata and Cx. tarsalis were too low in both experiments for formal statistical analysis. Data can be used to inform local mosquito surveillance programs, but the selection of a CO2 source will also depend on financial and logistical constraints.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较不同二氧化碳源对美国亚利桑那州立大学坦佩校区蚊媒采集效率。

在2个单独的4 × 4拉丁方试验中，我们比较了4种不同二氧化碳源(糖发酵BG-CO2、糖发酵弗莱施曼酵母、干冰和压缩气瓶)吸引不同蚊子种类的效果。在第1次试验(监测周期16 h)中，干冰和气瓶产生的CO2比糖发酵BG-CO2和Fleischmann酵母收集到的致倦库蚊更多，但埃及伊蚊的数量差异不显著。不同CO2源对Cx的收集无显著差异。致倦库蚊和伊蚊。第2期(24小时监测期)为埃及伊蚊。渔获量:在两个实验中，Tarsalis的含量太低，无法进行正式的统计分析。数据可以用来为当地的蚊子监测项目提供信息，但是二氧化碳源的选择也将取决于财政和后勤方面的限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 生物-昆虫学

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

10.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for publication as a supplement to the regular issue.