Allograft reconstruction of acetabular labrum has comparable outcomes to labral refixation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mohammad S Abdelaal, Ryan M Sutton, Cenk Atillasoy, Javad Parvizi
{"title":"Allograft reconstruction of acetabular labrum has comparable outcomes to labral refixation.","authors":"Mohammad S Abdelaal,&nbsp;Ryan M Sutton,&nbsp;Cenk Atillasoy,&nbsp;Javad Parvizi","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnac053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acetabular labrum plays an important role in hip stability, intra-articular fluid pressurization and force distribution. For irreparable labral pathology, labral reconstruction is an increasingly adopted technique shown to decrease hip pain and improve function. We evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of allograft labral reconstruction using the mini-open anterior surgical approach. Twelve patients who underwent labral reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon allograft (reconstruction group) were matched 1:3 based on age, gender, body mass index, year of surgery, preoperative Tönnis grade, previous hip surgery, residual hip pathology and extent of acetabular chondral lesion to a control group of 36 patients who underwent direct labral repair with anchors (refixation group). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, patient-reported outcomes, radiological findings and failure rates were compared. The average age was 31.3 years (±13.6) for reconstruction and 34.7 (±10.2) for refixation. Both groups had similar preoperative symptomatic periods (<i>P</i> = 0.3), prevalence of residual hip pathology (<i>P</i> = 1.0) and prevalence of prior hip surgeries (<i>P</i> = 1.0). both groups had a significant improvement of modified Harris Hip scores and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical scores. There was no statistically significant difference in conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty (25% versus 8.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.2); however, time to conversion was significantly longer in the reconstruction group (3.58 years ±1.04) compared to the refixation group (1.20 years± 0.93; <i>P</i> = 0.04). In conclusion, at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, mini-open labrum reconstruction for severe insufficiency of acetabular labrum demonstrated comparable improvements in functional outcomes and significantly longer survivorship compared to labral refixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"10 1","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234385/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The acetabular labrum plays an important role in hip stability, intra-articular fluid pressurization and force distribution. For irreparable labral pathology, labral reconstruction is an increasingly adopted technique shown to decrease hip pain and improve function. We evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of allograft labral reconstruction using the mini-open anterior surgical approach. Twelve patients who underwent labral reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon allograft (reconstruction group) were matched 1:3 based on age, gender, body mass index, year of surgery, preoperative Tönnis grade, previous hip surgery, residual hip pathology and extent of acetabular chondral lesion to a control group of 36 patients who underwent direct labral repair with anchors (refixation group). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, patient-reported outcomes, radiological findings and failure rates were compared. The average age was 31.3 years (±13.6) for reconstruction and 34.7 (±10.2) for refixation. Both groups had similar preoperative symptomatic periods (P = 0.3), prevalence of residual hip pathology (P = 1.0) and prevalence of prior hip surgeries (P = 1.0). both groups had a significant improvement of modified Harris Hip scores and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical scores. There was no statistically significant difference in conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty (25% versus 8.3%, P = 0.2); however, time to conversion was significantly longer in the reconstruction group (3.58 years ±1.04) compared to the refixation group (1.20 years± 0.93; P = 0.04). In conclusion, at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, mini-open labrum reconstruction for severe insufficiency of acetabular labrum demonstrated comparable improvements in functional outcomes and significantly longer survivorship compared to labral refixation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

同种异体移植重建髋臼唇与唇部再固定的效果相当。
髋臼唇在髋关节稳定、关节内液体加压和力分配方面起着重要作用。对于不可修复的唇部病理,唇部重建是越来越多采用的技术,显示减少髋关节疼痛和改善功能。我们评估了采用小切口前路手术重建同种异体唇瓣的存活率和临床结果。根据年龄、性别、体重指数、手术年份、术前Tönnis分级、既往髋关节手术、髋关节残余病理和髋臼软骨病变程度,将12例采用同种异体半腱肌腱进行唇部重建的患者(重建组)与36例直接使用锚钉进行唇部修复的对照组(再固定组)进行1:3匹配。在至少2年的随访中,比较患者报告的结果、放射学表现和失败率。重建组平均年龄为31.3岁(±13.6岁),再固定组平均年龄为34.7岁(±10.2岁)。两组术前症状期相似(P = 0.3),髋关节残留病理发生率相似(P = 1.0),既往髋关节手术发生率相似(P = 1.0)。两组的改良Harris髋关节评分和36项简短健康调查身体评分均有显著改善。全髋关节置换术的转换率无统计学差异(25% vs 8.3%, P = 0.2);重建组(3.58年±1.04年)比再固定组(1.20年±0.93年;p = 0.04)。总之,在至少2年的随访中,对于严重髋臼唇不全的小开口唇瓣重建术与唇瓣重建术相比,在功能结局上有相当的改善,生存期也明显延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信