Risedronate use may blunt appendicular lean mass loss secondary to sleeve gastrectomy: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial

Laura E. Flores, Kristen M. Beavers, Daniel P. Beavers, Katelyn A. Greene, Diana A. Madrid, Ryan M. Miller, Jamy D. Ard, Laura D. Bilek, Ashley A. Weaver
{"title":"Risedronate use may blunt appendicular lean mass loss secondary to sleeve gastrectomy: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial","authors":"Laura E. Flores,&nbsp;Kristen M. Beavers,&nbsp;Daniel P. Beavers,&nbsp;Katelyn A. Greene,&nbsp;Diana A. Madrid,&nbsp;Ryan M. Miller,&nbsp;Jamy D. Ard,&nbsp;Laura D. Bilek,&nbsp;Ashley A. Weaver","doi":"10.1002/rco2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite robust weight loss and cardiometabolic benefit, lean mass loss following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) confers health risk. Bisphosphonates are a potential therapeutic agent for lean mass maintenance. Thus, our objective was to explore the effect of 6 months of risedronate (vs. placebo) on change in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)- and computed tomography (CT)-derived lean mass metrics in the year following SG.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four SG patients were randomized to 6 months of 150-mg oral risedronate or placebo capsules (NCT03411902). Body composition was assessed at baseline and 6 months with optional 12-month follow-up using whole-body DXA and CT at the lumbar spine and mid-thigh. Group treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated from a mixed model using contrast statements at 6 and 12 months, adjusted for baseline values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 24 participants enrolled [55.7 ± 6.7 years (mean ± SD), 79% Caucasian, 83% women, body mass index (BMI) 44.7 ± 6.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>], 21 returned for 6-month testing and 14 returned for 12-month testing. Six-month weight loss was −16.3 kg (−20.0, −12.5) and −20.9 kg (−23.7, −18.1) in the risedronate and placebo groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.057). Primary analysis at 6 months revealed a non-significant sparing of appendicular lean mass in the risedronate group compared with placebo [−1.2 kg (−2.3, −0.1) vs. −2.1 kg (−3.0, −1.2)]; <i>P</i> = 0.20. By 12 months, the risedronate group displayed no change in appendicular lean mass from baseline [−0.5 kg (−1.5, 0.6)]; however, the placebo group experienced significantly augmented loss [−2.9 kg (−3.6, −2.1)].</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pilot data indicate that risedronate treatment may mitigate appendicular lean mass loss following SG. Further study is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rco2.72","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite robust weight loss and cardiometabolic benefit, lean mass loss following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) confers health risk. Bisphosphonates are a potential therapeutic agent for lean mass maintenance. Thus, our objective was to explore the effect of 6 months of risedronate (vs. placebo) on change in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)- and computed tomography (CT)-derived lean mass metrics in the year following SG.

Methods

Twenty-four SG patients were randomized to 6 months of 150-mg oral risedronate or placebo capsules (NCT03411902). Body composition was assessed at baseline and 6 months with optional 12-month follow-up using whole-body DXA and CT at the lumbar spine and mid-thigh. Group treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated from a mixed model using contrast statements at 6 and 12 months, adjusted for baseline values.

Results

Of 24 participants enrolled [55.7 ± 6.7 years (mean ± SD), 79% Caucasian, 83% women, body mass index (BMI) 44.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2], 21 returned for 6-month testing and 14 returned for 12-month testing. Six-month weight loss was −16.3 kg (−20.0, −12.5) and −20.9 kg (−23.7, −18.1) in the risedronate and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.057). Primary analysis at 6 months revealed a non-significant sparing of appendicular lean mass in the risedronate group compared with placebo [−1.2 kg (−2.3, −0.1) vs. −2.1 kg (−3.0, −1.2)]; P = 0.20. By 12 months, the risedronate group displayed no change in appendicular lean mass from baseline [−0.5 kg (−1.5, 0.6)]; however, the placebo group experienced significantly augmented loss [−2.9 kg (−3.6, −2.1)].

Conclusions

Pilot data indicate that risedronate treatment may mitigate appendicular lean mass loss following SG. Further study is warranted.

Abstract Image

利塞膦酸钠的使用可能会减轻袖式胃切除术后阑尾瘦肿块的损失:一项随机对照试验的结果
背景:尽管有显著的体重减轻和心脏代谢益处,但袖式胃切除术(SG)后的瘦体重减少会带来健康风险。双膦酸盐是维持瘦肉质量的潜在治疗剂。因此,我们的目的是探讨6个月的利塞膦酸钠(与安慰剂相比)对SG后一年双能x射线吸收测定(DXA)和计算机断层扫描(CT)衍生的瘦质量指标变化的影响。方法24例SG患者随机接受150 mg口服利塞膦酸酯或安慰剂胶囊(NCT03411902)治疗6个月。在基线和6个月时评估身体组成,并可选择12个月的随访,使用腰椎和大腿中部的全身DXA和CT。组治疗效果和95%置信区间(ci)由混合模型生成,使用6个月和12个月时的对比陈述,并根据基线值进行调整。结果入选的24名参与者[55.7±6.7岁(平均±SD), 79%高加索人,83%女性,体重指数(BMI) 44.7±6.3 kg/m2], 21人返回进行6个月的检测,14人返回进行12个月的检测。利塞膦酸钠组和安慰剂组6个月的体重减轻分别为- 16.3 kg(- 20.0, - 12.5)和- 20.9 kg (- 23.7, - 18.1) (P = 0.057)。6个月时的初步分析显示,与安慰剂相比,利塞酮组阑尾瘦质量无显著减少[- 1.2 kg(- 2.3, - 0.1)对- 2.1 kg (- 3.0, - 1.2)];p = 0.20。12个月时,利塞膦酸钠组阑尾瘦质量与基线相比没有变化[- 0.5 kg (- 1.5, 0.6)];然而,安慰剂组的体重损失显著增加[- 2.9 kg(- 3.6, - 2.1)]。结论初步数据表明,利塞膦酸钠治疗可减轻SG后阑尾瘦质量损失。值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信