Evaluation of Cairpol and Aeroqual Air Sensors in Biomass Burning Plumes.

Abstract

Cairpol and Aeroqual air quality sensors measuring CO, CO₂, NO₂, and other species were tested in fresh biomass burning plumes in field and laboratory environments. We evaluated sensors by comparing 1-minute sensor measurements to collocated reference instrument measurements. Sensors were evaluated based on the coefficient of determination (r ²) between the sensor and reference measurements, by the accuracy, collocated precision, root mean square error (RMSE), and other metrics. In general, CO and CO₂ sensors performed well (in terms of accuracy and r ² values) compared to NO₂ sensors. Cairpol CO and NO₂ sensors had better sensor-versus-sensor agreement (e.g., collocated precision) than Aeroqual CO and NO₂ sensors of the same species. Tests of other sensors (e.g., NH₃, H₂S, VOC, NMHC) provided more inconsistent results and need further study. Aeroqual NO₂ sensors had an apparent O₃ interference that was not observed in the Cairpol NO₂ sensors. Although the sensor accuracy lags that of reference-level monitors, with location-specific calibrations they have the potential to provide useful data about community air quality and personal exposure to smoke impacts.