An 18-month follow-up of the Covid-19 psychology research consortium study panel: Survey design and fieldwork procedures for Wave 6

IF 2.4 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Pub Date : 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1002/mpr.1949

Orla McBride, Sarah Butter, Anton P. Martinez, Mark Shevlin, Jamie Murphy, Todd K. Hartman, Ryan McKay, Philip Hyland, Kate M. Bennett, Thomas V. A. Stocks, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita, Liam Mason, Richard P. Bentall

{"title":"An 18-month follow-up of the Covid-19 psychology research consortium study panel: Survey design and fieldwork procedures for Wave 6","authors":"Orla McBride, Sarah Butter, Anton P. Martinez, Mark Shevlin, Jamie Murphy, Todd K. Hartman, Ryan McKay, Philip Hyland, Kate M. Bennett, Thomas V. A. Stocks, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Liat Levita, Liam Mason, Richard P. Bentall","doi":"10.1002/mpr.1949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Established in March 2020, the C19PRC Study monitors the psychological and socio-economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 6 (August–September 2021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The survey assessed: COVID-19 related experiences; experiences of common mental health disorders; psychological characteristics; and social and political attitudes. Adult participants from any previous wave (<i>N</i> = 3170) were re-invited, and sample replenishment procedures helped manage attrition. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the on-going original panel (from baseline) was nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, amongst other factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>1643 adults were re-interviewed at Wave 6 (51.8% retention rate). Non-participation was higher younger adults, those born outside UK, and adults living in cities. Of the adults recruited at baseline, 54.3% (<i>N</i> = 1100) participated in Wave 6. New respondent (<i>N</i> = 415) entered the panel at this wave, resulting in cross-sectional sample for Wave 6 of 2058 adults. The raking procedure re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1.3% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This paper outlines the growing strength of the publicly available C19PRC Study data for COVID-19-related interdisciplinary research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.1949","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1949","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

Established in March 2020, the C19PRC Study monitors the psychological and socio-economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 6 (August–September 2021).

Methods

The survey assessed: COVID-19 related experiences; experiences of common mental health disorders; psychological characteristics; and social and political attitudes. Adult participants from any previous wave (N = 3170) were re-invited, and sample replenishment procedures helped manage attrition. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the on-going original panel (from baseline) was nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, amongst other factors.

Results

1643 adults were re-interviewed at Wave 6 (51.8% retention rate). Non-participation was higher younger adults, those born outside UK, and adults living in cities. Of the adults recruited at baseline, 54.3% (N = 1100) participated in Wave 6. New respondent (N = 415) entered the panel at this wave, resulting in cross-sectional sample for Wave 6 of 2058 adults. The raking procedure re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1.3% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics.

Conclusions

This paper outlines the growing strength of the publicly available C19PRC Study data for COVID-19-related interdisciplinary research.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

对Covid-19心理学研究联盟研究小组进行为期18个月的随访:第6波的调查设计和实地调查程序

C19PRC研究于2020年3月启动，监测疫情对英国和其他国家的心理和社会经济影响。本文描述了Wave 6(2021年8月至9月)的协议。方法调查评估:COVID-19相关经验;常见精神健康障碍的经验;心理特点;以及社会和政治态度。从之前的任何一波成年参与者(N = 3170)被重新邀请，样品补充程序有助于管理损耗。使用调查排序算法计算权重，以确保正在进行的原始小组(从基线开始)在性别、年龄、家庭收入等因素方面具有全国代表性。结果1643名成人在第6波重新接受了访谈，保留率为51.8%。不参与的年轻人、在英国以外出生的人和生活在城市的成年人比例更高。在基线时招募的成年人中，54.3% (N = 1100)参加了第6波。新的被调查者(N = 415)在这一波进入小组，产生了第6波2058名成年人的横断面样本。倾斜程序重新平衡了纵向面板，使其在选定社会人口特征的人口估计的1.3%以内。本文概述了在covid -19相关跨学科研究中，可公开获得的C19PRC研究数据日益强大。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.