[Emotional competence of patients with chronic pain : A self- and third-party assessment].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1007/s00482-023-00720-x
Anne Juliane Körner, Rainer Sabatowski, Lisa Burdic, Linn Beyer, Anne Gärtner, Benjamin Schönbach, Ulrike Kaiser
{"title":"[Emotional competence of patients with chronic pain : A self- and third-party assessment].","authors":"Anne Juliane Körner, Rainer Sabatowski, Lisa Burdic, Linn Beyer, Anne Gärtner, Benjamin Schönbach, Ulrike Kaiser","doi":"10.1007/s00482-023-00720-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>The aim of the study is to assess the status quo of emotional competence in people with chronic pain. How do patients experience themselves regarding to their ability to perceive, express, and regulate emotions? And does this assessment coincide with the assessment of emotional competence (EC) by mental health professionals?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study took place in the context of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy at an outpatient clinic in N = 184 adult German-speaking individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain. EC was assessed at the end of therapy using the self- and third-party assessment scales of the Emotional Competence Questionnaire. The external assessment was performed by the mental health team. Standard scores were created using the norm sample provided by questionnaires. These were analyzed descriptively and inferentially.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-perceived EC was average (M<sub>self</sub><sub>_</sub><sub>total</sub> = 99.31; SD = 7.78). The mental health professionals predominantly rated the emotional competence of the patients significantly lower (M<sub>external</sub><sub>_total</sub> = 94,70; SD = 7,81; F(1.179) = 35,73; p < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17). Emotional expressivity, as a component of EC, was externally rated as below average (M<sub>expressivity_external</sub> = 89.14, SD = 10.33).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with chronic pain rate themselves as unimpaired in terms of their daily emotional awareness, expression, and regulation abilities. At the same time, mental health professionals rate these same individuals as significantly less emotionally competent. The question remains open as to what extent the divergent assessments can be explained by assessment bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":"125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10959775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-023-00720-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question: The aim of the study is to assess the status quo of emotional competence in people with chronic pain. How do patients experience themselves regarding to their ability to perceive, express, and regulate emotions? And does this assessment coincide with the assessment of emotional competence (EC) by mental health professionals?

Methods: The study took place in the context of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy at an outpatient clinic in N = 184 adult German-speaking individuals with non-cancer-related chronic pain. EC was assessed at the end of therapy using the self- and third-party assessment scales of the Emotional Competence Questionnaire. The external assessment was performed by the mental health team. Standard scores were created using the norm sample provided by questionnaires. These were analyzed descriptively and inferentially.

Results: Self-perceived EC was average (Mself_total = 99.31; SD = 7.78). The mental health professionals predominantly rated the emotional competence of the patients significantly lower (Mexternal_total = 94,70; SD = 7,81; F(1.179) = 35,73; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.17). Emotional expressivity, as a component of EC, was externally rated as below average (Mexpressivity_external = 89.14, SD = 10.33).

Discussion: Patients with chronic pain rate themselves as unimpaired in terms of their daily emotional awareness, expression, and regulation abilities. At the same time, mental health professionals rate these same individuals as significantly less emotionally competent. The question remains open as to what extent the divergent assessments can be explained by assessment bias.

Abstract Image

[慢性疼痛患者的情感能力:自我和第三方评估]。
研究问题:本研究旨在评估慢性疼痛患者的情绪能力现状。患者在感知、表达和调节情绪的能力方面是如何自我体验的?这种评估是否与心理健康专业人员对情绪能力(EC)的评估相吻合?这项研究是在门诊跨学科多模式疼痛治疗的背景下进行的,研究对象为 184 名成年德语非癌症相关慢性疼痛患者。在治疗结束时,使用情绪能力问卷的自我和第三方评估量表对情绪能力进行评估。外部评估由心理健康小组进行。使用问卷提供的标准样本创建标准分数。对这些分数进行了描述性和推断性分析:结果:自我感知的心理健康指数为平均值(Mself_total = 99.31; SD = 7.78)。心理健康专业人员对患者情绪能力的评价明显较低(Mexternal_total = 94,70; SD = 7,81; F(1.179) = 35,73; p 2 = 0.17)。情感表达能力作为EC的一个组成部分,外部评价低于平均水平(Mexpressivity_external = 89.14,SD = 10.33):讨论:慢性疼痛患者认为自己的日常情绪意识、表达和调节能力没有受损。与此同时,心理健康专业人员却认为这些患者的情绪能力明显较弱。评估偏差在多大程度上可以解释这种不同的评估结果,这个问题仍然没有答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信